Thank you, Mr. Gruber. If the polling company does this 'all the time,' for what purpose would they have to be told to select more persons of color and fewer old people in Florida in order to 'maximize what they get' out of their polling?
It seems like they're targeting groups that they expect to vote Democrat. Which doesn't make sense unless it's an attempt to measure their outreach efforts but that wouldn't be media polling would it?
So can you explain it to me or are insults your best effort?
https://conservativedailypost.com/b...inal-blow-on-hillary-after-fbi-case-reopened/
This is crazy and could be a huge game changer. They want to release them late enough so the Dems can't get someone to replace her. Crazy
You act as if getting a sample that isn't representative of the population is a new problem in statistics. It isn't. I still haven't advocated for altering the sample. So, you're still wrong and now I've told you that you're wrong an additional time. As you can see, despite my best effort you're making no progress.
I actually read quite a bit about this whilst arguing with Eskimospy about it. Turns out that correcting purely for registration based on your projected likely voter makeup is on the wane. Some still do it, but not nearly as many as did even back in 2008. Apparently, people lie to pollsters - if you are a registered Democrat and hate Hillary, you are likely to claim to be a registered Republican and vice versa. (You can generally tell those who do not attempt to correct for party registration; they no longer ask if you are a registered Republican or Democrat, they ask if you generally consider yourself or identify as a Republican or Democrat.) Serious pollsters now more often try to get more detailed demographic information on the idea that if they weight their responses to that information based on their likely voter model, they will generally get a more accurate weighting of Republican voters versus Democrat voters. Ironically, this is because past polls tended to overstate the Republican turnout.So they presented an unrepresentative sample as representative? Again I ask, why do this if the goal is accurate data?
It's weird, with people who I know in real life, it's almost exclusively lifelong Democrats supporting Trump rather than lifelong Republicans supporting Hillary, whereas seems to me that nationally it's the reverse. But I'm in ultra conservative Tennessee where I'm considered a wild-eyed foamy lefty, so YMMV.You've always been a known spewer of ignorance to be honest, you need to live with people calling you out on it if you continue to do so.
No Democrats are defecting to Trump in droves, other than in your mind.
It's weird, with people who I know in real life, it's almost exclusively lifelong Democrats supporting Trump rather than lifelong Republicans supporting Hillary, whereas seems to me that nationally it's the reverse. But I'm in ultra conservative Tennessee where I'm considered a wild-eyed foamy lefty, so YMMV.
https://conservativedailypost.com/b...inal-blow-on-hillary-after-fbi-case-reopened/
This is crazy and could be a huge game changer. They want to release them late enough so the Dems can't get someone to replace her. Crazy
the thing is, it doesn't make sense to say they have the deleted emails because if they have the deleted emails, they have all the emails. So they would have just said, we would release all the emails from her server not just the deleted ones.Where are those emails, retard?
the thing is, it doesn't make sense to say they have the deleted emails because if they have the deleted emails, they have all the emails. So they would have just said, we would release all the emails from her server not just the deleted ones.
the thing is, it doesn't make sense to say they have the deleted emails because if they have the deleted emails, they have all the emails. So they would have just said, we would release all the emails from her server not just the deleted ones.
https://conservativedailypost.com/b...inal-blow-on-hillary-after-fbi-case-reopened/
This is crazy and could be a huge game changer. They want to release them late enough so the Dems can't get someone to replace her. Crazy
but the OP isn't very intelligent and it's a lot of fun to call the OP a retard.
i'm reading them right now
10k of them are 'REMOVE ME FROM THIS LIST'
theres a 10k shitshow about people accusing each other of stealing food from the break room fridge
13k are exchanges about cats and cat videos
FTFYand sp33dy skulks back into his mom's basement...
Nope sp33dy starts a new thread about a new ridiculous theory and the cycle continues.and sp33dy skulks back into his basement...
MSNBC is the only, as far as I can tell, the only source reporting this.
That not only are 28% of republicans crossing over for Hillary, but that Trump has already in fact lost Florida.
And the minority vote is way up compared to 2012, with democrats holding solid behind Hillary.