zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,116
- 30,065
- 146
they obviously do not need asylum.
obviously? explain your reasoning.
from where do you claim to know this?
they obviously do not need asylum.
I think 95% of the ones who actually reach the border will follow the same process that these asylum seekers have always followed. Those 5% or less who actually attempt to slip through the cracks should be rounded up and deported as usual.
I think the only real story here is how Trump thinks cutting off aid will somehow stem the tide of migrants. Why does he always come up with the wrong answer to everything?
obviously? explain your reasoning.
from where do you claim to know this?
I hope we build a catapult and fire them back across the border.
I hope we build a catapult and fire them back across the border.
It's interesting how he talks about 'liberal hatred' in one post, and then gleefully expresses the desire to see refugees cruelly murdered in another.Well at least we've graduated from tossing grenades.
It's interesting how he talks about 'liberal hatred' in one post, and then gleefully expresses the desire to see refugees cruelly murdered in another.
They're wide out in the open and not in danger. They were able to gather and assemble thousands of people to march in open space through entire countries without danger. They need to make their countries great, not invade other countries.
wikipedia said:Guatemala is the largest economy in Central America, with a GDP (PPP) per capita of US$5,200. However, Guatemala faces many social problems and is one of the poorest countries in Latin America. The income distribution is highly unequal with more than half of the population below the national poverty line and just over 400,000 (3.2%) unemployed. The CIA World Fact Book considers 54.0% of the population of Guatemala to be living in poverty in 2009.[167][168]
Remember his Muslim ban?
Republican Jesus approves this message.
Christian persecutor, Saul, the Pharisee, never met Jesus. Ephesians was written by Saul.There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. There was a ban on seven predominantly muslim countries.
Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Jesus must have been talking to the Democrats. Dance, puppet.
There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. There was a ban on seven predominantly muslim countries.
Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Jesus must have been talking to the Democrats. Dance, puppet.
The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt; I am the LORD your God.
I hope we build a catapult and fire them back across the border.
what would happen inf 5k us citizens tried walking through mexico south without going through immigration?
There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. .
What do you think is going to happen after the first US soldier puts a bullet through the head of a woman or child?
Do you really think that is what they are there for?
Really? If so you are dumber than I thought.
Shit happens.
In this instance, shit can be prevented from happening by not placing trained killers around women and children.
IF you would take 5 minutes or so and read you would know that they are performing a support function only.
You're not really trying to imply that United States soldiers will be deploying anywhere without weapons are you?
Just askin'.
Mexico has several offers but those "refugees" outright reject them. So much for "just want to get away from bad situations" lies and bull crap.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/migrant-caravan-members-reject-offer-040211669.html
Migrants countered that the middle of a highway was no place to negotiate and said they wanted to at least arrive safely to Mexico City to discuss the topic with authorities and Mexican lawmakers.
From your link-
Doesn't seem like outright rejection to me... It's still 1000km from Mexico City to Matamoros, as well.
Hundreds of Mexican federal officers carrying plastic shields blocked a Central American caravan from advancing toward the United States on Saturday, after a group of several thousand migrants turned down the chance to apply for refugee status and obtain a Mexican offer of benefits.
The bulk of the migrants were boisterous Friday evening in their refusal to accept anything less than safe passage to the U.S. border.
"Thank you!" they yelled as they voted to reject the offer in a show of hands. They then added: "No, we're heading north!"
From my link-
Here is another link from AP -
https://www.yahoo.com/news/migrant-caravan-members-reject-offer-040211669.html
You were saying? Keep digging deeper for those "refugees", eh?
So they'll proceed to Mexico City to talk it over with the people who have the power to give them more than applications. The last caravan went to Tijuana instead of Matamoros & only ~200 made it to the border.
Your chicken little routine is kinda cute, anyway.