Another migrant caravan heading for the USA ...

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
I think 95% of the ones who actually reach the border will follow the same process that these asylum seekers have always followed. Those 5% or less who actually attempt to slip through the cracks should be rounded up and deported as usual.

I think the only real story here is how Trump thinks cutting off aid will somehow stem the tide of migrants. Why does he always come up with the wrong answer to everything?


I hope we build a catapult and fire them back across the border.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
obviously? explain your reasoning.

from where do you claim to know this?


They're wide out in the open and not in danger. They were able to gather and assemble thousands of people to march in open space through entire countries without danger. They need to make their countries great, not invade other countries.
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
18,491
11,139
136
They're wide out in the open and not in danger. They were able to gather and assemble thousands of people to march in open space through entire countries without danger. They need to make their countries great, not invade other countries.

Yep, they should settle in the veritable paradise that is Mexico, which doesn't at all have a reputation for its people wanting to move to the US, or drug wars, or anything like that.

wikipedia said:
Guatemala is the largest economy in Central America, with a GDP (PPP) per capita of US$5,200. However, Guatemala faces many social problems and is one of the poorest countries in Latin America. The income distribution is highly unequal with more than half of the population below the national poverty line and just over 400,000 (3.2%) unemployed. The CIA World Fact Book considers 54.0% of the population of Guatemala to be living in poverty in 2009.[167][168]

Another great candidate for settlement.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Remember his Muslim ban?

There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. There was a ban on seven predominantly muslim countries.


Republican Jesus approves this message.

Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Jesus must have been talking to the Democrats. Dance, puppet.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,678
8,055
136
There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. There was a ban on seven predominantly muslim countries.




Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Jesus must have been talking to the Democrats. Dance, puppet.
Christian persecutor, Saul, the Pharisee, never met Jesus. Ephesians was written by Saul.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. There was a ban on seven predominantly muslim countries.

You mean, Trump lied?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...l-muslims-entering-us-san-bernardino-shooting




Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Jesus must have been talking to the Democrats. Dance, puppet.

First, advocate throwing people to their deaths with a catapult. Next, quote the Bible as duh-version. Have you no self awareness at all? No sense of shame whatsoever?

Here's a verse that's actually on-point- Leviticus 19:34-

The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt; I am the LORD your God.
 

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,253
3,824
136
what would happen inf 5k us citizens tried walking through mexico south without going through immigration?

What do you think is going to happen after the first US soldier puts a bullet through the head of a woman or child?
 

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,253
3,824
136
There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. .

I'll bet you deny the Holocaust happened as well. The 6 million Jews are all hiding on another planet right? The camps were really vacation resorts right?
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,610
4,668
136
What do you think is going to happen after the first US soldier puts a bullet through the head of a woman or child?

Do you really think that is what they are there for?
Really? If so you are dumber than I thought.
 

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,253
3,824
136
Do you really think that is what they are there for?
Really? If so you are dumber than I thought.

Shit happens.

In this instance, shit can be prevented from happening by not placing trained killers around women and children.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,610
4,668
136
Shit happens.

In this instance, shit can be prevented from happening by not placing trained killers around women and children.

IF you would take 5 minutes or so and read you would know that they are performing a support function only.
 

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,253
3,824
136
IF you would take 5 minutes or so and read you would know that they are performing a support function only.

You're not really trying to imply that United States soldiers will be deploying anywhere without weapons are you?

Just askin'.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,610
4,668
136
You're not really trying to imply that United States soldiers will be deploying anywhere without weapons are you?

Just askin'.

You are not really trying to imply that the United States soldiers are being sent to the border to shoot women and children, are you?


They deploy all the time without weapons.

April 3, 2018 Article:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-military-border-limited-role/story?id=54208209

That's because the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the U.S. military from conducting law enforcement duties in the United States. The only way that can be allowed is by a special congressional authorization.

Trump's suggestion of U.S. military troops along the border with Mexico echoes actions by President George W. Bush in 2006 and by President Barack Obama in 2010 that sent thousands of National Guard troops to assist with border operations.

But the troops participating in Operation Jump Start and Operation Phalanx respectively were only allowed to serve in a support role for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel.

In line with Posse Comitatus, they were not allowed to detain people crossing the border illegally from Mexico.

Instead, the thousands of National Guardsmen who participated in the earlier operations were used in mostly administrative and surveillance roles.

Guardsmen monitored video surveillance feeds from drones and stationary cameras along the border and manned watch towers located near the border from which they could notify border agents about illegal crossings.

Their presence was intended to free up CBP personnel that could be used in greater numbers along the border.


October 25, 2018 Article:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pen...s-border-logistical-support/story?id=58741906

The initial estimate is that 800 to 1,000 service members could deploy in logistical support of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), such as setting up tents for border authorities, the official said. They could also help construct fencing that is separate from the border wall.

These active duty forces will not act in a law enforcement capacity; instead, they will strictly provide logistical and technical support to CBP. The assignment means the deployment would not violate the Posse Comitatus Act which prohibits the use of active duty forces in a law enforcement capacity.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Mexico has several offers but those "refugees" outright reject them. So much for "just want to get away from bad situations" lies and bull crap.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/migrant-caravan-members-reject-offer-040211669.html

From your link-

Migrants countered that the middle of a highway was no place to negotiate and said they wanted to at least arrive safely to Mexico City to discuss the topic with authorities and Mexican lawmakers.

Doesn't seem like outright rejection to me... It's still 1000km from Mexico City to Matamoros, as well.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
From your link-



Doesn't seem like outright rejection to me... It's still 1000km from Mexico City to Matamoros, as well.

From my link-
Hundreds of Mexican federal officers carrying plastic shields blocked a Central American caravan from advancing toward the United States on Saturday, after a group of several thousand migrants turned down the chance to apply for refugee status and obtain a Mexican offer of benefits.

Here is another link from AP -

https://www.yahoo.com/news/migrant-caravan-members-reject-offer-040211669.html

The bulk of the migrants were boisterous Friday evening in their refusal to accept anything less than safe passage to the U.S. border.

"Thank you!" they yelled as they voted to reject the offer in a show of hands. They then added: "No, we're heading north!"

You were saying? Keep digging deeper for those "refugees", eh?
 
Last edited:

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
So they'll proceed to Mexico City to talk it over with the people who have the power to give them more than applications. The last caravan went to Tijuana instead of Matamoros & only ~200 made it to the border.

Your chicken little routine is kinda cute, anyway.

I posted links from well know sources to back up my statements, and you have what? Just more lame excuses and pathetic spins.

Remember this. LEGALS = si. ILLEGALS = no. Comprende?

But hey, follow the current immigration rules and laws are for chumps, right? Just sneak in, lay low for a few years, pop out a few babies = good enough for you and your ilk. Why even bother to do things the right way. So much for "fairness", "equality", "for the working class". LOL.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |