Joseph Combs
Member
- Jul 27, 2018
- 74
- 15
- 81
The Foundation for Trouble-making sounds like something the Chinese government spokespeople would come up with.
Well, if it is your name, then I'll drop it.Its my name, what does that say about my character?
Which opinion?Your opinion. And you probably got that from CNN or MSNBC.
IF you're responding to the quote I made regarding Gaetz's tweet, it came from a conservative site.Your opinion. And you probably got that from CNN or MSNBC.
IF you're responding to the quote I made regarding Gaetz's tweet, it came from a conservative site.
Link: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/s...ly-showing-people-paid-join-honduran-caravan/
The article provides a quote from the organizer of the caravan: “What Trump says doesn’t interest us. These people are fleeing. These people are not tourists.” Does this not sound like an entitlement statement? Whether you love/hate Trump, the country has immigration laws and the entry of a person into the country without a valid Visa is illegal. What's your take ... and are you prepared for another influx?
He abandoned the thread right after starting it.Sure about that?
https://www.htlweb.com/blog/2017/07...en-unlawful-presence-and-improper-entry.shtml
The difference between unlawful presence and improper entry
On behalf of Taylor Lee & Associates LLC posted in US Immigration Law on Friday, July 21, 2017.
In the United States, in the eyes of immigration officials, while illegal immigration is unlawful, an immigrant's unlawful presence is not. There is a clear delineation between the two categories and depending on which one you fall into, potential benefits and consequences associated with each.
As for improper entry, it perhaps the most common type of immigration crime. It is also considered to be a misdemeanor under United States law.
There are one of three conditions that must be met in order to charge someone with this crime. An individual who tries to enter the country at a place or time other than one previously designated by an immigration official is said to have violated federal law. Similarly, any individual who somehow is successful in avoiding inspection or questioning by immigration might also be seen as having violated this law.
In another instance, any person who either makes an attempt to physically enter the country or perhaps be smuggled into it may also be deemed to have violated this law. Finally, any individual who voluntarily falsifies, conceals or otherwise misrepresents facts used to make immigration decisions might be held on improper entry charges as well.
Those who violate improper entry laws can face as much as six months in jail and up to $250 in fines per attempted entry.
When it comes to the concept of unlawful presence, an individual does not have to necessarily enter the country improperly in order to be here unlawfully. Instead, an individual may have entered the country legally, yet overstayed the expiration date on his or her visa.
While an individual's unlawful presence is not considered a criminal offense in this country, it is a violation of the terms you agreed to when you applied and received your visa. You may be required to pay civil penalties or fines for having overstayed it.
You also might be subject to detention and deportation from the country as well. If you overstay your visa, you might also face difficulties in renewing your visa or getting a new one issued to you in the future.
If you have either illegally entered the country or have overstayed your visa and you're facing incarceration, deportation or substantial fines, then a Norcross, Georgia, immigration attorney might be able to help.
Funny how the fine for DUI is considerably higher huh?
How do you expect your "common sense" to be enforced?No, just use common sense instead of acting like idiots. But, I guess common sense isn't so common these days.
People with children have other family members. I just want to avoid the fiascos of the past. You know how this is gonna play out.
Mexican immigration officials say activist Irineo Mujica, who has dual U.S. and Mexican citizenship, is accused of property damage and resisting arrest.
A statement from the officials says that Mujica attacked immigration agents, as well as local and federal police, after he was asked for his identification as he gathered foreigners for a protest.
Edgar Corzo, a representative of Mexico's National Human Rights Commission, who is in Ciudad Hidalgo, says police are accusing Mujica of slashing the tires on an immigration agency vehicle.
Peaceful you say?
Rules and laws are for suckers, eh?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-trump-threatens-close-border-over-caravan-131654202.html
Its my name, what does that say about my character?
He abandoned the thread right after starting it.
That bastard ...
Actually, the real reason I started this thread was to learn all I could about immigration law because I knew that I could learn more much faster by posting here and allowing the internet lawyers to interject ... than paying eleventy billion dollars (and untold number of years) to go to Harvard Law.
Conservatives don't really think straight about immigration in general.
So, uhh, just trolling, right?
No, actually. According to Gallup, immigration/illegal aliens is the #2 issue mid-term election issue (non-economic). I thought that members might find it interesting that an organized group of thousands of people are moving north toward our southern border with the intent of entering the country. I also thought, perhaps foolishly, that they might want to talk about it.
I am a centrist and find it disturbing how conservative AND liberal Americans classify one another. Your post just reinforces the fact that many people cannot accept the fact that others might not agree with them. In that case we must insult them and classify them as morons. "Conservatives don't really think straight about immigration in general." Really? I've heard similar descriptions about Jews, blacks, etc. throughout history.
Really?
This made me laugh out loud. For real.Real refugees .... not ones paid for by George Soros and the Democratic Party.
Hey OP, are you ignorant of legal asylum?
Reality is in the eye of the beholder .....