Surely terror convicts should not be welcomed by retired US diplomats to head political outfits, right?That’s awful. Clearly allowing a religious majority to attack a religious minority is bad. Wouldn’t you agree?
Rahman is currently living in the United Kingdom under forced exile. Notable, he is the prime convict and mastermind of the 21st August 2004 terrorist grenade attack on Awami League’s political rally. Military-grade Arges grenade was used in the attack to target the entire top leadership of Awami League including Hasina. 24 leaders and workers including Ivy Rahman, President of Women Awami League and wife of late President Zillur Rahman were killed in the attack. Several hundred attendees of the rally were injured and many of them became permanently handicapped. On 10th October 2018, Rahman was sentenced to life in prison for the grenade attack.
On 11th September 2008, Rahman fled to London, United Kingdom claiming he needed medical treatment. It was said that he gave a written bond that he would not indulge in politics in the future after which he was allowed to go to London. Khalida Zia claimed that her son would actively participate in politics once he returned to Bangladesh. She also claimed that the Bangladeshi government was trying to harass her son to delay his return to the country.
allowing a religious majority to attack a religious minority is bad right?Surely terror convicts should not be welcomed by retired US diplomats to head political outfits, right?
https://www.opindia.com/2024/08/ret...np-tarique-rahman-bangladesh-deep-state-coup/
Retired US Diplomat calls for return of Islamist BNP’s Tarique Rahman to Bangladesh: How support for 2004 terror attack convict fuel speculations of deep state coup further
The fact that he reads shit like that does explain a lot. @Braznor is just another rube happily eating up news that makes him feel validated. He doesn't care what's true because his feelings are what's true.
Ask Modi.I don't recall India asking US to fix all its problems. All we ask is that US doesn't make it worse. Is that too much to ask? To be a decent government?
I sure hope they don't pass a law where Hindus aren't welcome based on their religion. That would be bad, right?
Are you agreeing with Yunus or disagreeing with him? Not sure what your position is.
Are you agreeing with Yunus or disagreeing with him? Not sure what your position is.
Does your media criticism extend to the misinformation site you linked earlier?The MSM providing excuses for why Hindus are being killed in Bangladesh ------Read their excuses.
Straight from the horses mouth? Thats good enough for you? Oh wait.....Does your media criticism extend to the misinformation site you linked earlier?
Allow him to return home, deal with his legal issues, see his mother, run for office if he wishes doesn't imply recommending him for office... The lie is that part. The best lies always contain some truth.Straight from the horses mouth? Thats good enough for you? Oh wait.....
So what exactly was the misinformation here from Opindia? Oh wait, you didn't like it? Too fucking bad! Deal with it.
Just go read the wiki article about it, it’s a hub of misinformation. Let me guess though, Wikipedia is biased against it. Lol.Straight from the horses mouth? Thats good enough for you? Oh wait.....
So what exactly was the misinformation here from Opindia? Oh wait, you didn't like it? Too fucking bad! Deal with it.
Allow him to return home, dela with his legal issues, see his mother, run for office if he wishes doesn't imply recommending him for office... The lie is that part. The best lies always contain some truth.
I mean "His future role should be determined by his party and the voters, no more, no less" doesn't say recommendation does it?
We all know which side of Wikipedia is buttered. So serve that bullshit to yourself.Just go read the wiki article about it, it’s a hub of misinformation. Let me guess though, Wikipedia is biased against it. Lol.
Look, you are an easy mark for right wing propaganda because they know you don’t think critically about information. They think you are stupid and will swallow whatever they say so long as it tells you what you want to hear. Looks like you proved them right.
You missed the part about deal with legal issues.Asking to give a terror convict a chance to enter back into politics. I don't know which planet you are from. Sure sounds like a recommendation to me or at least a reference in the CV of the convicted terrorist.
Hahaha - I called it!We all know which side of Wikipedia is buttered. So serve that bullshit to yourself.
I might understand asking to let him out of jail or something. But wanting a terror convict to become potential PM?You missed the part about deal with legal issues.
Yay! Now do your usual celebratory jig and shove that head of yours right back into your rectum.Hahaha - I called it!
Like I said, the site you quoted and ones like it think you are stupid. Trust me, no liberal has more contempt for your intelligence than conservative media sites do, and you keep proving them right.
Doesn’t it bother you that they think so poorly of your intellect?
Did you not understand the twit? The diplomat just said let him back, have his day in court. Should he choose to run, it's the decision of his party and the people to allow or disallow...I might understand asking to let him out of jail or something. But wanting a terror convict to become potential PM?
Are you sure you are not missing a screw somewhere in your head? Oh wait, you are deliberately playing it obtuse.
Like I predicted when you shared an obviously non-credible source because you’re too stupid to vet sources and this was pointed out to you instead of apologizing you decided that the real problem wasn’t you, but everyone else.Yay! Now do your usual celebratory jig and shove that head of yours right back into your rectum.
First you denied the report was true. Then I quoted straight from the guy's mouth. Then one of the usual acolytes chime in to say its not a recommendation. Now you are pretending that the MSM and Wikipedia doesn't have bias. There is a good reason why Wiki is not allowed as a source for legitimate purposes. Pretending otherwise just shows the extent of your insincerity towards the conversation.
.
Yea, yea. Now buzz off. we already had a thread over it.Like I predicted when you shared an obviously non-credible source because you’re too stupid to vet sources and this was pointed out to you instead of apologizing you decided that the real problem wasn’t you, but everyone else.
I think you got it backward. He believes these things, he just goes to these rag sites to support his beliefs.Like I predicted when you shared an obviously non-credible source because you’re too stupid to vet sources and this was pointed out to you instead of apologizing you decided that the real problem wasn’t you, but everyone else.