Another Newbie Trying to Build a Gaming PC

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hubb1e

Senior member
Aug 25, 2011
396
0
71
The problem is that some of the parts in his build are out of stock, and there's no telling when they'll be available again.

What iI meant is that his general parts list is a good build. The CPU, the Z77 chipset, the amount of RAM, the video card performance level. Those parts will make a balanced machine with longevity and upgradability. The other parts can generally be swapped out for equivalent parts with no ill effect. But I saw in some other posts people saying you could go with a non-k processor and other stuff to that effect and I'd stay more or less within his framework. Motherboards, RAM, cases, and PSUs can be changed for similar parts based on availability and cost at the time.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
^ Maybe. They're priced OK. What really makes the Radeons tempting is that they're effectively $40/game cheaper, for any one game they come with that you actually play, and performance is similar.

CPU+MB: http://promotions.newegg.com/intel/13-2602/index.html
The MSI one is back in stock. At $80 off, even though you don't need any overclocking capability, it ends up about the same price as trying to work combos for a decent H-series board. That was what made choosing parts for around $1000 really annoying...knowing that was || close, but not purchasable. Without wanting specific looks or features, many parts are pretty much interchangeable, so it comes down to a bang/buck comparison.

RAM: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...&SID=u00000687
The promo code that makes it $45 ends in 2 days.

PSU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817139026
$20 AMIR, and worth it during the rare times when it's not on sale...can't beat it, for stock speed operation.

Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...&SID=u00000687
The Challenger is a fine case for the money. I'm one of those people that wish all blue LEDs on electronics would disappear, so I'll never go out of my way to recommend one . The Cooler Master is expensive mostly for its looks. It and a few Antecs that have been around awhile are highly overrated, IMO.

Then, the rest from here, SSD optional, and Windows 7 or 8 Home 64-bit OEM.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
^ Maybe. They're priced OK. What really makes the Radeons tempting is that they're effectively $40/game cheaper, for any one game they come with that you actually play, and performance is similar.

CPU+MB: http://promotions.newegg.com/intel/13-2602/index.html
The MSI one is back in stock. At $80 off, even though you don't need any overclocking capability, it ends up about the same price as trying to work combos for a decent H-series board. That was what made choosing parts for around $1000 really annoying...knowing that was || close, but not purchasable. Without wanting specific looks or features, many parts are pretty much interchangeable, so it comes down to a bang/buck comparison.

RAM: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...&SID=u00000687
The promo code that makes it $45 ends in 2 days.

PSU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817139026
$20 AMIR, and worth it during the rare times when it's not on sale...can't beat it, for stock speed operation.

Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...&SID=u00000687
The Challenger is a fine case for the money. I'm one of those people that wish all blue LEDs on electronics would disappear, so I'll never go out of my way to recommend one . The Cooler Master is expensive mostly for its looks. It and a few Antecs that have been around awhile are highly overrated, IMO.

Then, the rest from here, SSD optional, and Windows 7 or 8 Home 64-bit OEM.

Which of those two processors did you mean for me to consider?

Also, I'm still getting hung up on the goddamn case! I keep scouring through page after page of them on Newegg trying to find one for a decent price that has a good amount of fans, preferably larger in size, but won't sound like an air conditioner at the same time. I just don't want things overheating!

I was looking at the Rosewill Blackhawk, the Cooler Master Storm Sniper, and a couple other ones. I've tried, but I just can't shake this obsession with having larger fans (200mm), and more of them. The Storm Sniper case looks great, and it's got a discount of about $28... Ugh. I don't know which to pick!
 
Last edited:

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Also, I'm still getting hung up on the goddamn case! I keep scouring through page after page of them on Newegg trying to find one for a decent price that has a good amount of fans, preferably larger in size, but won't sound like an air conditioner at the same time. I just don't want things overheating!

I was looking at the Rosewill Blackhawk, the Cooler Master Storm Sniper, and a couple other ones. I've tried, but I just can't shake this obsession with having larger fans (200mm), and more of them. The Storm Sniper case looks great, and it's got a discount of about $28... Ugh. I don't know which to pick!

You're getting too hung up on fans and cooling. You're not going to overheat at all with the components you're looking at, unless you're running them outdoors in a Phoenix summer. Just got a simple Rosewill case, with at least 1 intake fan and exhaust fan, 80mm for each. That should be perfectly fine. It'll also let you save some money that could be used to get a faster CPU or video card.

Yeesh, that's pushing it.

Seconded. The wattage is way too low, and its actually lower than the recommended wattages for most higher end video cards. It doesn't take much more money to get a much better PSU.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Yeesh, that's pushing it.
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/2050/11/

Yeah, looks like you're right, there. Especially with different other reviews coming to substantially different results, with the boost versions. I was thinking it was a bit lower, for some reason.

How's about a CX600, with $12 off promo and a $20 MIR (basically $40 net)?

Also, I'm still getting hung up on the goddamn case! I keep scouring through page after page of them on Newegg trying to find one for a decent price that has a good amount of fans, preferably larger in size, but won't sound like an air conditioner at the same time. I just don't want things overheating!
Worrying too much. You can get crap cases, but if you get a case with a good rep, it will not be a problem. Really. The Challenger will be fine, as will any number of Corsair or Fractal Design or NZXT or Bitfenix or...you get the idea. Without multi-GPU, heavy overclocking, water cooling (needed due to pushing thermal limits from overclocking), etc., you won't get anything worth noting with most of the more expensive cases, outside of aesthetics. You could spend a bit more on a Fractal Design R4 or Silverstone Kubai, to get things a little quieter, but the Challenger will be fine, if you're not crazy about making it really quiet (among other cases).
 
Last edited:

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
Alright. I called Best Buy and talked to a member of the Geek Squad, and he was heavily involved in PC Gaming. Actually, they must not have been busy, because I could hear a couple other Geek Squad Gamers talking with him, helping me answer some questions that I had. He even hopped onto Newegg and looked at some products with me.

We talked a lot about Graphics Cards, and now I just want to see what you guys think of what he suggested before he had to let me go and get back to work.

He recommended the EVGA GeForce GTX 760 4GB 256-Bit after we looked around at some various cards and talked about things like Core Clock Speeds and CUDA Cores and how more on-board memory is always a good thing. He said that this card could potentially perform just as well as this card because it can be overclocked to match the speed, and the couple hundred CUDA Core difference wouldn't cause noticeable performance differences.

Is that true? Is the first card (the GTX 760 4GB for $279) a good card to get?
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Oh, absolutely, if you want to go nVidia. It's a little expensive, but not by much, and except for a couple models, the GTX 670 was generally overpriced, compared to its Radeon competition,

The GTX 760, while just released, clearly trades blows with the Radeon HD 7950, possibly being a touch faster, on average. Not counting any included games, they look like they're priced right.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
Oh, absolutely, if you want to go nVidia. It's a little expensive, but not by much, and except for a couple models, the GTX 670 was generally overpriced, compared to its Radeon competition,

The GTX 760, while just released, clearly trades blows with the Radeon HD 7950, possibly being a touch faster, on average. Not counting any included games, they look like they're priced right.

$280 seems like a nice price for a card of that level. It's got 4GB of on-board memory, can be overclocked to reach over 1000MHz, and has 1152 CUDA cores. The more expensive but incredibly similar cards may have more CUDA cores and a higher clock speed without the use of overclocking, but as the Geek Squad Gamers all agreed on the phone (we kinda had a little conference call that lasted just a few seconds shy of 50 minutes), 192 more CUDA cores won't make a noticeable difference.

Now I just have to learn how to overclock, should it be necessary. They all said that if I get that card, it might do everything that I need and want it to without needing to be overclocked. Well, that, and I have to pick out the rest of my build, lol.
 
Last edited:

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
With a CPU, there's a fair bit to it. With the video card, you install Afterburner, move a couple sliders, and run stability tests (partly because the settings allowing you to fry a card are not available for you to change)...and you're probably going to want Afterburner anyway, if just for the easy monitoring capability.

Normally, getting lots of VRAM is spending a lot of money needlessly, but it doesn't look like the RAM is slower, and it's only $20 more, so just make sure the mod the crap out of Skyrim to make it use some of that extra VRAM, in this case . It's more than you'll need for quite some time, but it's not enough extra money v. the 2GB cards for me to try too hard to talk you out of it.
 
Last edited:

DSF

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2007
4,902
0
71
I wouldn't buy that EVGA. It's got an old-fashioned blower-style cooler which is going to be louder than a comparable multi-fan card. I would personally be looking at a card with 2-3 fans because they're actually quieter, believe it or not. With multiple fans they can all be run at lower RPM, making the whole unit less noisy.

There are several such offerings from EVGA, Gigabyte and MSI if you look around Newegg, and they're less expensive than the one you linked anyway.

I would at least strongly consider an HD7950. They're strong at stock speeds, highly overclockable and come with big game bundles right now.

As far as Bateleur's post, I agree with all of it except the 80mm fan bit. Buy a case that has 120mm or 140mm fan bays. They're quieter at a given air flow and should pretty much be standard these days. 80mm fans are old tech.

Side note, I wouldn't read too much into the fact that the guy is a Geek Squad member. Some of them are very knowledgeable, many are not.

Edit: I see now that the $280 one is the only one with 4GB VRAM. Yet another reason to look at the 7950 in my opinion. You can get 3GB VRAM which is plenty, plus the 4 game deal for as little as $250 after rebate.
 
Last edited:

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
and come with big game bundles right now.
As already mentioned a few times ITT, this is a kind of big thing.

Thinking about Far Cry 3? The Radeon is that much cheaper.
Thinking about the new Tomb Raider? The Radeon is that much cheaper.
Thinking about Bioshock Infinite? The Radeon is that much cheaper.
Thinking about Crysis 3? Well...

If you're definitely going to get a Geforce no matter what, the 760 is good as of release, here, but consider the added value of some games on Steam.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
I've read that the drivers for AMD are worse or less updated than NVIDIA, though. True?

Looking at the AMD 7000 series, should I look at a 7950, and a 7970?

This, this, or this?

Theoretically, the same concepts from my conversation with the Geek Squad Gamers applies; I can overclock to faster speeds, and a couple of hundred stream processors shouldn't make a noticeable difference.
 
Last edited:

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
I've read that the drivers for AMD are worse or less updated than NVIDIA, though. True?
No. ATI's drivers sucked, years ago, and the idea still has inertia. nVidia's drivers aren't as good as they used to be, and AMD's drivers are solid. They're both quite reliable, but with annoying bugs cropping up sometimes.

Looking at the AMD 7000 series, should I look at a 7950, and a 7970?
The 7950 is a bit cheaper (look at the Sapphire linked in this thread and mfenn's thread for a good deal from a good maker), the 7970 a little faster, and more expensive. If you think you'd be interested in the included games, there's a good bit of extra value, and gateway drugs to Steam (also, check out GoG).

Thing is, while faster/slower, you're not going to come across any game that will have playable performance on a HD 7970, that won't be just as playable on a HD 7950 or GTX 760, at any resolution around 1080P. If you want to stay closer to your target budget, the 7950 or 760 will allow that, while still offering great performance. Shooters can run a little smoother with a GTX 770 or HD 7970, and you can turn up the detail and/or add more eye candy mods to slower-paced games like RPGs, but it's not going to be a major difference, without a high-res monitor (such as 2560x1440).

IoW: one's faster, and you get what you pay for; one's slower, and you can do something else with the money you save. But, going much lower in price, you can start to lose performance/$ just as much as with raising it, and the $250-350 cards from both companies currently seem to offer the most bang/buck, right now. Even substantially cheaper cards can play any game out there or coming out soon just fine, the faster ones can just do it faster and/or with more eye candy enabled.

Since nVidia locked the GPU voltage a few driver versions back, overclocking potential has been pretty similar between AMD and nV, and both get about the same for a given % overclock, so that's going to be fairly even, between them.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
No. ATI's drivers sucked, years ago, and the idea still has inertia. nVidia's drivers aren't as good as they used to be, and AMD's drivers are solid. They're both quite reliable, but with annoying bugs cropping up sometimes.

The 7950 is a bit cheaper (look at the Sapphire linked in this thread and mfenn's thread for a good deal from a good maker), the 7970 a little faster, and more expensive. If you think you'd be interested in the included games, there's a good bit of extra value, and gateway drugs to Steam (also, check out GoG).

Thing is, while faster/slower, you're not going to come across any game that will have playable performance on a HD 7970, that won't be just as playable on a HD 7950 or GTX 760, at any resolution around 1080P. If you want to stay closer to your target budget, the 7950 or 760 will allow that, while still offering great performance. Shooters can run a little smoother with a GTX 770 or HD 7970, and you can turn up the detail and/or add more eye candy mods to slower-paced games like RPGs, but it's not going to be a major difference, without a high-res monitor (such as 2560x1440).

IoW: one's faster, and you get what you pay for; one's slower, and you can do something else with the money you save. But, going much lower in price, you can start to lose performance/$ just as much as with raising it, and the $250-350 cards from both companies currently seem to offer the most bang/buck, right now. Even substantially cheaper cards can play any game out there or coming out soon just fine, the faster ones can just do it faster and/or with more eye candy enabled.

Since nVidia locked the GPU voltage a few driver versions back, overclocking potential has been pretty similar between AMD and nV, and both get about the same for a given % overclock, so that's going to be fairly even, between them.

The Vapor-X isn't too much more expensive than any of the others, and it's what was recommended by MFENN, so it's probably a good choice.
 

mfenn

Elite Member
Jan 17, 2010
22,400
5
71
www.mfenn.com
No. ATI's drivers sucked, years ago, and the idea still has inertia. nVidia's drivers aren't as good as they used to be, and AMD's drivers are solid. They're both quite reliable, but with annoying bugs cropping up sometimes.

The 7950 is a bit cheaper (look at the Sapphire linked in this thread and mfenn's thread for a good deal from a good maker), the 7970 a little faster, and more expensive. If you think you'd be interested in the included games, there's a good bit of extra value, and gateway drugs to Steam (also, check out GoG).

Thing is, while faster/slower, you're not going to come across any game that will have playable performance on a HD 7970, that won't be just as playable on a HD 7950 or GTX 760, at any resolution around 1080P. If you want to stay closer to your target budget, the 7950 or 760 will allow that, while still offering great performance. Shooters can run a little smoother with a GTX 770 or HD 7970, and you can turn up the detail and/or add more eye candy mods to slower-paced games like RPGs, but it's not going to be a major difference, without a high-res monitor (such as 2560x1440).

IoW: one's faster, and you get what you pay for; one's slower, and you can do something else with the money you save. But, going much lower in price, you can start to lose performance/$ just as much as with raising it, and the $250-350 cards from both companies currently seem to offer the most bang/buck, right now. Even substantially cheaper cards can play any game out there or coming out soon just fine, the faster ones can just do it faster and/or with more eye candy enabled.

Since nVidia locked the GPU voltage a few driver versions back, overclocking potential has been pretty similar between AMD and nV, and both get about the same for a given % overclock, so that's going to be fairly even, between them.

:thumbsup: Great way of putting it.

I would personally go for the 7970 Ghz for $350 (which is why I put the build together that way!), because IMHO the GPU is the #1 determiner of GPU performance. Cerb is absolutely right that the incremental difference between the 7950 (or GTX 760) and the 7970 GHz won't make a difference between playable and unplayable at 1080p. I just like getting the most GPU I can for the money.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
:thumbsup: Great way of putting it.

I would personally go for the 7970 Ghz for $350 (which is why I put the build together that way!), because IMHO the GPU is the #1 determiner of GPU performance. Cerb is absolutely right that the incremental difference between the 7950 (or GTX 760) and the 7970 GHz won't make a difference between playable and unplayable at 1080p. I just like getting the most GPU I can for the money.

Thanks for the input!

I'll likely be going with that model, the Sapphire Tech 7970 GHz.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
Here's what I've got put together. Let me know what you guys think, please!

1) Cooler Master HAF 922 Case
Retail: $119.99 > $20 Instant > $10 Rebate > $20 Promo = $69.99
2) Intel Core i5-4670K Processor & MSI Z87-G45 Motherboard Combo Pack
Retail: $399.98 > $10 Instant > $80 Combo = $319.98 + $10 Newegg Gift Card & Intel Limited Edition Skull T-shirt
3) Team Vulcan 8GB RAM (2x4GB)
Retail: $59.99 > $15 Promo = $44.99
4) Seagate Barracuda 2TB HDD
Retail: $99.99 > $20 Promo = $79.99
5) Sapphire Tech Vapor-X Radeon HD 7970 GHz Graphics Card
Retail: $459.99 > $90 Instant > $20 Rebate = $349.99 + 4 Free Games ($169.98)
6) Corsair 600W Power Supply
Retail: $79.99 > $10 Instant > $20 Rebate > $12 Promo = $37
7) Cooler Master 200mm Case Fan
Retail: $23.99 > $7 Instant > $8 Rebate = $8.99
8) ASUS 24" LCD Monitor
Retail: $229.99 > $40 Instant > $20 Rebate = $169.99
9) Logitech MK120 USB Wired Desktop Set
Retail: $24.99 > $5 Instant > $5 Promo = $14.99
10) Cooler Master CM Storm Gaming Mouse
Retail: $44.99 > $10 Instant > $5.25 Promo = $29.74
11) Samsung 840-Series 120GB SSD
Retail: $129.99 > $20 Instant > $11 Promo = $98.99

Shipping: $9.99
Grand Total: $1,313.62
 
Last edited:

Major Orange

Member
May 22, 2013
70
0
0
Hullo! Just popping in here as I'd been checking this too, I myself sort of need a mouse for my build too and thought 'Oi that looks nice'. Just to let you know that your math is off by ten, it comes in at 29,74. it's 44,99 - 15,25 or 34,99 - 5,25.
 

Sleepingforest

Platinum Member
Nov 18, 2012
2,375
0
76
All I can say is that you probably don't need an extra case fan, and you can probably get a better monitor (one with less input lag), like the Dell U2312HM. Try to submit your order in 2 groups so you can use the Newegg giftcard that comes with the CPU right away.

Finally, if you're getting a gaming mouse, it should at least come with extra buttons at the side--you shouldn't pay $30 for a higher polling rate and DPI (the latter of which is almost entirely marketing anyway). Look at the Logitech G400.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
7) Cooler Master 200mm Case Fan
Retail: $23.99 > $7 Instant > $8 Rebate = $8.99
Total waste. The case comes with all you'll need, already installed. If you wanted to change it around a little and give slightly lower temps to your video card, you could move the top fan to the side, as an intake (which would also make it significantly positive pressure). It's not just the $24/$9, but that with a single GPU, the single front 200m as a lone intake is probably enough to cool everything sufficiently, already (if the drive cage makes it not quite enough, it'll still be awfully close). A 4th fan in the mix is just going to make it collect dust quicker.
 

ADD1CTED GAM3R

Junior Member
Jun 24, 2013
23
0
0
Hullo! Just popping in here as I'd been checking this too, I myself sort of need a mouse for my build too and thought 'Oi that looks nice'. Just to let you know that your math is off by ten, it comes in at 29,74. it's 44,99 - 15,25 or 34,99 - 5,25.

Whoops! I must have hit the 1 instead of the 2. Thanks, lol.

All I can say is that you probably don't need an extra case fan, and you can probably get a better monitor (one with less input lag), like the Dell U2312HM. Try to submit your order in 2 groups so you can use the Newegg giftcard that comes with the CPU right away.

Finally, if you're getting a gaming mouse, it should at least come with extra buttons at the side--you shouldn't pay $30 for a higher polling rate and DPI (the latter of which is almost entirely marketing anyway). Look at the Logitech G400.

The extra fan is for the side of the case, to blow on the GPU.

What's wrong with the monitor that I picked out?

The gift card that comes with the CPU isn't electronically delivered; it will take some time to get here, and I'd much rather get everything all at once, and find something to use the gift card on afterwards. I can probably even sell it to one of my tech-friends.

The majority of my games, I'll be playing with an Xbox 360 controller, because I'm downright awful with the mouse and keyboard for gaming, so I didn't see the need to spend a lot on a mouse.

Total waste. The case comes with all you'll need, already installed. If you wanted to change it around a little and give slightly lower temps to your video card, you could move the top fan to the side, as an intake (which would also make it significantly positive pressure). It's not just the $24/$9, but that with a single GPU, the single front 200m as a lone intake is probably enough to cool everything sufficiently, already (if the drive cage makes it not quite enough, it'll still be awfully close). A 4th fan in the mix is just going to make it collect dust quicker.

Well, I have yet to place the order, so I can always leave that fan out.

I might leave out the SSD as well, because I really just don't know if it's actually all that worth it or not. I've never had experience with them before.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |