You guys keep dancing around Harvey and fail to address any single point in his comments....so who is the dullard really?
The guy with facts, points, and links or the ones making character assassinations?
how can you not know whether it's your own wang? and isn't that an implicit admission that he has been sending pics of his gentleman's sausage across teh intartubes?
The dullard is the one that continues to cut and paste incessantly, while changing nobody's mind. And "character assassinations"? The drama runs deep in you, as does your love for the old bitter Harvster, or you'd see that that's his MO.
That said, what does any of this have to do with a Congressman sending somebody pictures of his wang? And why would Harv, being the esteemed leader that he is, cause the topic to run so off-course with his c&p wall of "proof"?
You're a bit premature in calling him a perv, cheat and a liar. So far, there's no admission and no proof that that he wasn't hacked, as he claims.
Hey Harvey, any updates on the trial of our "ex-Traitor In Chief and his criminal cabal"? :biggrin:
If you want me to hijack this thread with pages of posts proving it, I'll be glad to do so. It's easy. I have them all formatted as macros.
If that's not what you want, please enjoy a healthy dose of STFU.
Go for it, your rapidly increasing dementia is always good for a laugh. :biggrin:
This. At some point in Bush Derangement Syndrome, cognitive functions have declined to the point that any perceived hit to the Bush opposition, even one as amusing and non-threatening* as this, must be met with wall o'idiocy about Bush. I especially like the self-important touting of how he is establishing his "veracity" through Google hits. I'm reminded of poor souls in tinfoil hats mailing themselves letters so they can "prove" they knew about our government's evil collusion with the aliens abducting our cattle by the postmarks.The dullard is the one that continues to cut and paste incessantly, while changing nobody's mind. And "character assassinations"? The drama runs deep in you, as does your love for the old bitter Harvster, or you'd see that that's his MO.
That said, what does any of this have to do with a Congressman sending somebody pictures of his wang? And why would Harv, being the esteemed leader that he is, cause the topic to run so off-course with his c&p wall of "proof"?
At some point in Bush Derangement Syndrome...
You guys keep dancing around Harvey and fail to address any single point in his comments....so who is the dullard really?
The guy with facts, points, and links or the ones making character assassinations?
You guys keep dancing around Harvey and fail to address any single point in his comments....so who is the dullard really?
The guy with facts, points, and links or the ones making character assassinations?
Probably because this isn't a Bush thread, it's a Weiner thread that he is trying to hijack. If he wants to rehash old far left talking points he should make a new thread.
I know. I replied to your post on the topic. dali71 is the one who raised the subject of the Bushwhackos. Take it up with him and his wingnut buddies. I would have dropped it long ago if they hadn't continued posting replies calling me names and challenging the facts I posted.
And thanks for the bump.
Ok, ok... lets just have every politician drop their pants and show their junk and get this all over with.
Maybe in some government published magizine called THE JUNK OF CONGRESS photo book. Then we can move on. Or maybe a pin-up calendar? Your congressman of the month? Or better yet... make congress clothing optional (except for Barney Frank...).
So when is Harvey going to post some proof? I keep asking for it yet see nothing.
I've posted exactly what you asked for many times, including in this thread.
Didn't your mother ever warn you, if you didn't stop that, you'd go blind? If so, you must not have listened.
Either that, or you're still the same lying right wingnut you've always been.
But thanks for the bump.
So if it's all true why hasn't the current administration pushed for prosecution?
I must subscribe to Pacific Telephone & Telepath because I already answered that. I don't know. I'm sure it's some kind of political calculation. I'm not happy about it, and I've written Obama at whitehouse.gov and to Attorney General, Eric Holder to express my disgust about it.
That said, your question doesn't alter the irrefutable facts proving that they committed the crimes. Neither does all the name calling by those who wish they could disagree, and they've already shown that they're utterly incabable of disproving any of what I posted.
Of course, that won't stop most of them from denying those facts, lying and calling me more names.
Quit playing the victim dude. You and the rest of us know that if all that was true heads would be rolling.
And as for us proving you wrong, the current administration has already does that for you by ignoring you and others like you.
Every now and then in life we are wrong, this is one of those times for you and you can thank Obama, Holder and the lot for proving that for us.
Republicans step down when there's a scandal, democrats don't. That's a fact.
:biggrin:
BULLSHIT! Personally, I think it's a political calculation that prosecuting them, at least now, would raise such a stink that it would distract them from pursuing other important parts of their agenda. But that's just MHO.
BULLSHIT! I gave you facts and links. Open, stationary targets, and you and the rest of the lamers taking shots at me can't... I'll repeat ... CAN'T prove otherwise.
Every now and then, we are all wrong. This is YOUR time, not mine. If you don't think so, freaking prove it, or STFU. If you can't, you're just jacking off and wasting everyone's time.
But thanks for the bump.