Anwr Issue

Delta52

Member
Jan 21, 2005
77
0
0
http://www.doi.gov/news/030312.htm
http://www.anwr.org/backgrnd/potent.html
http://www.anwr.org/topten.htm

Why shouldn't we drill in ANWR? I see no reason to. The caribou population, which people were worried about with "the Alaska pipeline" earlier has been multiplied by ten since the pipeline was built. Also, only about 8% of it needs to be explored. The remaining 17.5 million acres is currently not planned to be explored. ANWR is a huge deal in insulating us from supply problems overseas. And it means a trillion dollars of outsourced dollars stay home. This snowballs into well over a trillion dollars of GDP when all is said and done. Additionally, that northern coastal plain area of ANWR was set aside for oil exploration by the 1980 Democratic Congress and Jimmy Carter, not Republicans. "The geologic indicators are very favorable for the presence of significant oil and gas resources in ANWR, but the limited data means that there is a high level of uncertainty about how much oil and gas may be present. Consequently, current estimates represent the best scientific guesses. However, most geologists agree that the potential is on the order of billions of barrels of recoverable oil and trillions of cubic feet of recoverable gas and that these resources may rival or exceed the initial reserves at Prudhoe Bay. The validity of these estimates can be proved only by drilling exploratory wells. Authorization for exploration must be given by Congress and the President.

In 1996 the North Slope oil fields produced about 1.5 million barrels of oil per day, or approximately 25 percent of the U.S. domestic production. However, Prudhoe Bay, which accounts for over half of North Slope production, began its decline in 1988, and no new fields have yet been discovered with the potential to compensate for that decline." (http://www.anwr.org/backgrnd/potent.html)



 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
I thought the oil in ANWR wasn't amenable to be refined for gasoline use here in the States and that most of it would be sold to overseas customers.

Even if it were able to be refined for gasoline here in the States, it would provide, what, a month or two of our daily usage?

The money being spent to drill in ANWR would be best put to use to setup nationwide infrastructure of alternative sources of energy like Ethanol or for increasing safety of nuclear power plants so we can build more.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
48,077
37,268
136
Originally posted by: conjur
I thought the oil in ANWR wasn't amenable to be refined for gasoline use here in the States and that most of it would be sold to overseas customers.

Even if it were able to be refined for gasoline here in the States, it would provide, what, a month or two of our daily usage?

The money being spent to drill in ANWR would be best put to use to setup nationwide infrastructure of alternative sources of energy like Ethanol or for increasing safety of nuclear power plants so we can build more.

Ethanol is a dead end as an alternative fuel until someone can figure out a way to make it more efficiently.

Our existing nuclear plants are safe and the 3rd & 4th Gen plants are even safer. The problem is economic and political. Most Americans just do not want nuclear plants near them after Chernobyl (which can?t even happen to a commercial nuclear plant in the US) and Three Mile Island (successful containment of accident).
 
Jan 18, 2001
14,465
1
0
I would be much more inclined to support drilling up there if 2 conditions were met:

1) the oil produced would have a significant and long lasting effect on US gasoline prices
AND
2) there was a concerted effort to reduce fossil fuel consumption (e.g., consider imposing tougher minimum MPG requirements, lowering maximum speed limits to 60, etc...)

It seems to me, and I may be wrong, but drilling in Anwr would only really benefit those who do the drilling, lay the pipelines, and do the refining.

 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
We should drill in ANWR. Seems like a no brainer. Alaskans who live there are for it from what I understand. And if there ever was a place I could care less about the ecology of, it's ANWR. I don't plan to go there, I don't eat Caribou meat, I don't drinkwater from there. From my point of view it's like drilling on the moon or in Antarctica.
But the federal government should not be subsidizing the pipelines. If it makes financial sense to drill there, the government shouldn't have to pay for pipelines.
 

Delta52

Member
Jan 21, 2005
77
0
0
Some quick facts for those too lazy to click....

"only the 1.5 million acre or 8% on the northern coast of ANWR is being considered for development. The remaining 17.5 million acres or 92% of ANWR will remain permanently closed to any kind of development. If oil is discovered, less than 2000 acres of the over 1.5 million acres of the Coastal Plain would be affected. That¹s less than half of one percent of ANWR that would be affected by production activity."
"Federal revenues would be enhanced by billions of dollars from bonus bids, lease rentals, royalties and taxes. Estimates on bonus bids for ANWR by the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Interior for the first 5 years after Congressional approval are 4.2 billion dollars."
"Between 250,000 and 735,000 ANWR jobs are estimated to be created by development of the Coastal Plain."
"The Coastal Plain of ANWR is America's best possibility for the discovery of another giant "Prudhoe Bay-sized" oil and gas discovery in North America. U.S. Department of Interior estimates range from 9 to 16 billion barrels of recoverable oil."
"Oil and gas development and wildlife are successfully coexisting in Alaska 's arctic. For example, the Central Arctic Caribou Herd (CACH) which migrates through Prudhoe Bay has grown from 3000 animals to its current level of 32,000 animals. The arctic oil fields have very healthy brown bear, fox and bird populations equal to their surrounding areas"
"Advanced technology has greatly reduced the 'footprint" of arctic oil development. If Prudhoe Bay were built today, the footprint would be 1,526 acres, 64% smaller."
"More than 75% of Alaskans favor exploration and production in ANWR. The Inupiat Eskimos who live in and near ANWR support onshore oil development on the Coastal Plain."


http://www.anwr.org/topten.htm



 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |