- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,274
- 9,358
- 146
The underlying flaw in each and every of your questions is buying into the concept called "God" as a distinct and active actor, a Joe God, if you will. This is because you (and most all religions in their popularly promoted form) base their cosmological explanations for the masses of their followers on a Dog and Pony show starring Joe God. As was stated elsewhere, man wasn't made in the image of God, man made God in his (corporeal, male, authoritarian) image.Well, I'll share the Qs:
- Why do the concepts of sin & atonement even exist? You're God, just make everything whole
- Why does God let hell exist.. to be suffering for eternity? That's a little hard no?
- Why does God even care about your deeds in this world? I mean, I'm a crappy guy and even I would graciously let EVERYONE go to heaven. Why the fack not?
- etc...
While none of know anything for sure, I happen to believe in the divine. That is to say, I stand with the Zen Buddhists in my belief that we are ALL part of one indivisible and divine whole, that division and separateness are illusory, i.e. maya, and that everyone and everything has an intrinsic, inherent worth (divine). So, what you do to anything or anyone else, you do to yourself. Act accordingly, with kindness, compassion and reverence.
Now, there are undoubtedly a whole host of virile, manly, self-described "no-nonsense realists" here who would point and laugh at the airy-fairy aspects of my beliefs . . . as if their view of what is and what isn't is the one true objectivity. Facts on the ground! Only what is solid and tangible to our five simian senses is real!
And yet, if there's one thing quantum mechanics and string theory shed a strong and irrefutable light on, it is that no one of us monkey descended bipeds has a firm handle on the fucking basic nature of the universe whatsoever! Our very earth-bound, five senses bound language and "common sense" is woefully inadequate to describe, yet comprehend, WHAT ACTUALLY IS.
Now, there have been, and will be, right in this thread, easy potshots taken at the all too lame, Joe God and Jeebus dog and pony show crapola promoted by most mainstream religions . . . once meant as metaphorical teachings, now hardened into easily laughed at cartoons.
That is not my ineffable and provisional understanding of the divine. Just please don't reject my somewhat inchoate, often tenuous and always open to change belief in what I call "the divine", mister clear-eyed, manly man, mister self-described "rationalist."
Whatever is or isn't, not one of us knows for sure. But the following remains true:
You limit the scope of your inquiry, you limit your findings.