Originally posted by: 1966
If this if that if ....
It does have it & it uses it so get over it,If AMD could do it they would but Intel has it & is faster,so stop your whining.
Originally posted by: BD231
.90nm AMD chip for me, can't wait .
Originally posted by: DragonFire
Originally posted by: 1966
If this if that if ....
It does have it & it uses it so get over it,If AMD could do it they would but Intel has it & is faster,so stop your whining.
What I was trying to get at is Intel has to have speical help in order to beat AMD, kinda like having a Intel V8 engine but it will only run as a V6 unless you add a speical addtive.
And I'm not whining, just giving my 2 cents.
Originally posted by: Jeff7181I plan to get an Athlon-64 when the .90 nm process is perfected, and motherboards are more overclocker friendly.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: DragonFire
Originally posted by: 1966
If this if that if ....
It does have it & it uses it so get over it,If AMD could do it they would but Intel has it & is faster,so stop your whining.
What I was trying to get at is Intel has to have speical help in order to beat AMD, kinda like having a Intel V8 engine but it will only run as a V6 unless you add a speical addtive.
And I'm not whining, just giving my 2 cents.
Depending on how one looks at it, they both need "special" help. Each processor has strengths and weaknesses, just because one requires something the other doesn't, it doesn't make one better than the other. In the end, all that matters is Realworld performance.
Originally posted by: ragazzo
Originally posted by: BD231
.90nm AMD chip for me, can't wait .
Amid a new and bold plan to build a 300-mm wafer fab, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. disclosed that it has delayed the volume deployment of its 90-nm process technology by two to three months. AMD originally hoped to ramp up its 90-nm process in the first half of 2004, with volume production due in the latter part of the second quarter of next year, said Hector Ruiz, AMD's president and CEO.