I have an MSI GF4 Ti4600.
The AA feature was pushed as one of the reasons to get the card.
I tried it a little last night on NOLF and Q3A - I did not like it at all.
I did not notice it that much on Q3A (except the lower FPS) but on NOLF, there was a lot of artifacting and it really made the frame rate erattic. Also - the effect was fairly noticeable at times and on the 2D screens there was some really bad artifacts.
I then remembered when I had my V5 5500, I never used AA - I played Tribes 1 mostly, and it did pretty much the same thing.
Personally, I find that running 12x10 or 16x12 resolution looks better than the AA effect
ph - I was using 4X and some Quincuxn whatever types.
Anyone else think AA is just a big yawn?
DR
The AA feature was pushed as one of the reasons to get the card.
I tried it a little last night on NOLF and Q3A - I did not like it at all.
I did not notice it that much on Q3A (except the lower FPS) but on NOLF, there was a lot of artifacting and it really made the frame rate erattic. Also - the effect was fairly noticeable at times and on the 2D screens there was some really bad artifacts.
I then remembered when I had my V5 5500, I never used AA - I played Tribes 1 mostly, and it did pretty much the same thing.
Personally, I find that running 12x10 or 16x12 resolution looks better than the AA effect
ph - I was using 4X and some Quincuxn whatever types.
Anyone else think AA is just a big yawn?
DR