You really do think that statement is intelligent don't you?
What false equivalence would you be referring to? The President shouldn't lead? Continue to be programmed.
OK.
So, in this current climate which you freely admit to: where neither side is willing to compromise, where it is fully known by all with the capability of reading that the
only goal of the last 2 sessions of Teabagger controlled congress is to oppose anything that Obama does, regardless of merit, regardless of need, regardless of soundness--to the obvious and great detriment of our country, "Obama be damned"--what does "leading" mean for Obama?
Does it mean stepping out, bitch-slipping these yahoos into submission and cramming every thing he wants down their throats, since it's plainly obvious that it is the only way to pass anything?
That's his only option, really. So, when he leads in this climate, how then do you label him?