- Nov 18, 2009
- 698
- 2
- 81
I don't own one, but I always assumed it was a MPG vs. purchase price type trade off. I would also guess that a hybrid might be more expensive to repair, but not necessarily given the numbers of them on the road these days.
Cons, you pay more for the car upfront and need to drive a lot to make it up. Most people won't make up the difference between just getting a normal car with great gas mileage. Some people think driving 10k miles a year is a lot. You'd definitely have to drive a lot to make up the difference but when we have normal gas cars that can get around 40mpg now, I wouldn't get a hybrid. Plus it has more things that would eventually need replacing.
Show me one that gets anywhere near that in city driving.
City driving is where the hybrid shines.
People driving in a city normally don't drive 20k+ a year.
I've been looking at them, but as others have pointed out, the "break even point" requires quite a few more miles than normal.
We rarely drive even 10,000 miles per year, (some years, not even 7500) so for us, the added cost of a hybrid over a comparably equipped car just doesn't make sense. Yes, I'd LOVE to have a car that gets ~50 MPG in/around town...but financially, it just doesn't add up. (BTW, many of the hybrids don't get anywhere near their advertised EPA mileage. Ford has been getting hammered over their Fusion and C-Max hybrids averaging 10 MPG less than advertised...or worse)
brainhulk, I tried to get into one of the PriusC cars...couldn't get through the door comfortably...and when I did finally get in...I hit my head on the roof. NOT for me. The standard Prius hatchback was fine though.
I don't think you need to break even to justify the cost of a hybrid. There is something to be said for supporting the technology.
I was thinking about an Escape Hybrid for a bit but then they decided to stop making it. Fuckers
BTW, many of the hybrids don't get anywhere near their advertised EPA mileage. Ford has been getting hammered over their Fusion and C-Max hybrids averaging 10 MPG or ess than advertised...or worse
Take a look at the C-Max. It's the "replacement" for the Escape hybrid.
Too bad I couldn't get the fuel economy beyond 35 mpg in a nice relaxed no traffic highway drive from san Diego to LA... I don't see how it is possible to obtain the rated 40+mpg at all. This is one the only hybrid I have driven (Lexus 400h, prius) that falls so short of rated mpg :/
I was thinking about an Escape Hybrid for a bit but then they decided to stop making it. Fuckers
I thought Ford got caught misrepresenting their hybrid MPGs.