There have been 2 Prince of Persia games since the The Two Thrones
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Persia_(2008_video_game)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Persia:_The_Forgotten_Sands
I'm also waiting for another Splinter Cell game.
Has Ubisoft given up on "The Prince of Persia"? I've been waiting for one since "The Two Thrones".
There have been 2 Prince of Persia games since the The Two Thrones
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Persia_(2008_video_game)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Persia:_The_Forgotten_Sands
I'm also waiting for another Splinter Cell game.
People complaining about Ubisoft sequels gets old
There was 1 year between Doom (1993) and Doom II (1994) and the game is basically exactly the same gameplay and graphics
There is less innovation between Doom and Doom II than there was between AC: Brotherhood and AC: Revelations which is the most complained about part of the series, yet when Doom II came out everybody was all over it
Why does Ubisoft get shat on repeatedly where other companies get a pass?
Well, FC3 was fun and since FC4 is more of the same, it is also fun. This thread pushed me to start FC4 since it's been sitting in my library for a very long time and it's a blast. I don't really like how the paths are pretty black and white and I'm sure it will give you a similar choice as you had in FC3, but the world is big enough that I'm finding plenty to do and the outposts are actually fun to do this time around.
My only gripe with the game is how easy it is to unlock pretty much everything right out of the gates. Almost all the craftables are available right from the start, but most guns are locked for way too long. As in, you get both bows right off the bat, but I'm 60% through the main game and still haven't unlocked the crossbow yet... doesn't make much sense. And the requirement of getting Rank 10 in the arena is a bit silly since it's just non-stop grinding. It would be different if the arena battles changed, but they don't. They should have taken a page from Borderland 2's book about arena fights. I think I'm rank 6 and I really don't want to continue just for that signature.
All in all, I still don't understand why people have to try to be critics about everything. Video games are meant to be fun, not judged based on how realistic the facial expressions are or if the game reuses animations from previous games. If it's fun, then play it. If you don't find it fun, move on to something else.
Yea, I'm with you. I probably won't buy it for awhile because I haven't beat Pong yet. Not sure why anyone would need another game when I'm pretty sure NO one has beat pong yet.
Honestly, this one interests me more than 2,3,4 or Primal. The others were pretty generic in terms of their story, except for 1.
Boycott? Did you meant to say you simply won't purchase the game? Pretty sure not buying a game and making one post about it here isn't protesting anything.
Am the only one who likes all the extra "padding" in Ubisoft open worlds?
Gives me something to do after finishing the main story, their maps are some of the most detailed and i have a lot of fun exploring them
You mean, am I ready for a Far Cry 4 mod that changes the setting from Nepal to Montana?
No, I will never be ready for that.
Pretty sure 99% of all games on the market consists of some assholes talking about complete fantasy.and listen to assholes in games talk complete fantasy.