He has a point but I do agree it’s possible to concentrate on more than one thing at a time
It's acceptable to concentrate on the ....problem of haircuts?
Defending this defends the notion that people of means shouldn't care about those without, and shouldn't spend their time doing such work, regardless of their means and regardless of their integrity or results.
The entire premise of this thread is abject garbage. Conservatives have replaced their Hilary hate, based on decades of gaslit false events with AOC hate, concocted from the same sort of fallacies disguised as a false hypocrisy that they ascribe to their "enemies."
Conceding the value of such an argument is the exact same as the tolerance paradox: the more you concede the validity of false, dishonest arguments, only such arguments will remain. People that support this fallacy have no desire for honest debate or engaging in actual problems. Giving them any ground simply validates their playground strategy of shitting on the chess board and declaring victory.
Notice that not one conservative has a legitimate complaint about AOC in terms of active policy. It is all about this brain worm that they nourish of her couple of months working as a bartender, simply to help support her mom, absolutely defines who she is "a bartender"
Such people are inherently dishonest, incurious about educating themselves, and will forever refuse to engage in adult conversation. Such people should be dismissed outright until they display any interest in climbing out of this trap of self-biasing argumentative fallacies that they have constructed as a protective shield against the many uncomfortable truths that define their inherent weakness, and immorality.