brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 26,716
- 25,051
- 136
FTFYThe fantasy of AOC being taken down by an elitist haircut is such whimsy.
FTFYThe fantasy of AOC being taken down by an elitist haircut is such whimsy.
So you deny that AOC is going to face a primary attack from centrists and a concerted well funded GOP attack, with both framing her as out of touch.
Funniest thing I've read all day. Someone should put that in the dictionary under the definition of "hypocrisy"Ill help out with the #DRUMPF_DEFELECTION talking points.
Here
Project Veritas’ alleged CNN whistleblower claims network is ‘pumping out propaganda'
Undercover recordings made by an alleged “whistleblower” capture CNN employees casually confirming the network's anti-Trump bias and show company president Jeff Zucker telling top news executives to focus solely on impeachment even at the expense of other important news, according to the...www.foxnews.com
This is Fox ... accusing CNN of bias. By quoting project veritass.
I feel very confident that regardless of who she faces, her opponents will be getting $300 haircuts too.
let’s see. These are the republican challengers I could find. BTW, I do believe female candidates should disclose how much they pay for hairdos and nails. You know, full disclosure and all that.
Nope.
Maybe.
Maybe but I don’t think she has highlights.
You are correct. Not all claims are legitimate. That is why I’ve defended AOC in the numerous threads in which she comes up. However, her social media presence increasingly veers into influencer and celebrity mode, while her political activities arguably lost valuable jobs for her district.Do I deny that? No why would I? What I deny is that just because a political opponent brings something up that that makes it a legitimate issue. Thinking it is legit concern only legitimizes nonsense like birtherism, swift boat veterans, and the many other dubious claims political opponents make to sway those not capable of thinking for themselves. Are you one of those people?
I defend her when it deserves defending. Ever since Republicans tried to scandalize her with dancing and taking pictures of her ass. You guys are pathetic.You are correct. Not all claims are legitimate. That is why I’ve defended AOC in the numerous threads in which she comes up. However, her social media presence increasingly veers into influencer and celebrity mode, while her political activities arguably lost valuable jobs for her district.
I see nothing wrong with a political opponent challenging in this manner. After all, that is how AOC won her seat in the first place.
What I have noticed is that any time AOC comes up, there is a wave of posters who rally to her defense like the group of irrational fanboys they are. Are you one of those people?
I defend her when it deserves defending. Ever since Republicans tried to scandalize her with dancing and taking pictures of her ass. You guys are pathetic.
This one gets labeled on the ash heap of ridiculous so called GOP labeled "scandals". Let's not talk about their real scandals.
Go find my posts over dancegate. You’re welcome to dismiss this one.I defend her when it deserves defending. Ever since Republicans tried to scandalize her with dancing and taking pictures of her ass. You guys are pathetic.
This one gets labeled on the ash heap of ridiculous so called GOP labeled "scandals". Let's not talk about their real scandals.
To summarize this thread of so much concern:
AOCs hair is too damn expensive
AOC should be donating all her money to either taxes or low paid working people
AOCs social media accounts are too celebrity and need to be monitored
AOC shouldn’t be a Representative because she didn’t earn enough while working
AOC shouldn’t be a Representative now because the salary is too much, we would prefer working people be Representatives
AOC has political opponents
...and we're STILL fucking talking about this.
Did I miss anything?
So you deny that AOC is going to face a primary attack from centrists and a concerted well funded GOP attack, with both framing her as out of touch.
ROFL, really? Her opponents will attack her for being a bartender. For being poor. For not being the elite rich snob class.
This topic is the opposite of reality, trying to pan her off as living the good life as some rich fat cat. "self-indulging-in-elite-capitalism" my ass.
You are correct. Not all claims are legitimate. That is why I’ve defended AOC in the numerous threads in which she comes up. However, her social media presence increasingly veers into influencer and celebrity mode, while her political activities arguably lost valuable jobs for her district.
I see nothing wrong with a political opponent challenging in this manner. After all, that is how AOC won her seat in the first place.
What I have noticed is that any time AOC comes up, there is a wave of posters who rally to her defense like the group of irrational fanboys they are. Are you one of those people?
To summarize this thread of so much concern:
AOCs hair is too damn expensive
AOC should be donating all her money to either taxes or low paid working people
AOCs social media accounts are too celebrity and need to be monitored
AOC shouldn’t be a Representative because she didn’t earn enough while working
AOC shouldn’t be a Representative now because the salary is too much, we would prefer working people be Representatives
AOC has political opponents
Did I miss anything?
Incels in particular do seem to have an obsession with her.That every comment was by a man? Men I can only assume that are of the incel persuasion.
Your glass house is absolutely gorgeousI call bull shit when I see it. If you notice my posts more then that might be related to what you post.
Incels in particular do seem to have an obsession with her.
I know I've mentioned it before, but she's the worst/best case for them (or most anyone on the GOP spectrum)
Female
Person of Color
Educated
Now is a position of power/popularity
And she's attractive (I realize this is subjective, but by most measures, she not "ugly")
They're confused with how to deal with her and how to feel about her. Fox news tells them to hate/fear her. but the tingling in their pants confuses them.
On the scale of Dijon Mustard to Tan Suit, Mustard = Satanic, and Tan Suit = commie-fascist America-hating, where does Haircut sit?
we really need an honest scale that measures conservative outrage properly.