The only thing that is really open to interpretation is why Congress isn't upholding its Constitutional duties.I read the Atlantic article, and WAPO commentary as well. The full release of the Mueller report does not substantially change what we learned from the more favorable Barr summary. Can we agree that there was no collusion knock out blow, and that obstruction is open to interpretation.
Russians chose to destabilize the US so that they can continue their illegal conquests in Georgia and Ukraine without strong opposition.So did the Russians, it would seem.
You resort to personal attacks when you can no longer support your argument. It’s quite predictable and tiresome.There is no arguing with a "both sides" bitch, bubble dweller. He'll only dig in his heels or mysteriously stop posting until he thinks people forget his ridiculous claims.
Agreed. The Mueller report is quite clear that Trump lied and also gave unlawful orders. There is adequate grounds for impeachment, and yet the Democrats have been quite assertive in dodging that path.The only thing that is really open to interpretation is why Congress isn't upholding its Constitutional duties.
No, but you are welcome to go help @ivwshane with those goal posts. He doesn’t have much lower body strength and is probably going to suffer a hernia from all the mental gymnastics.Are you Barr's like water boy or something?
That is pretty funny considering how the left has acted the past decade.If given a choice between conservatism and democracy the conservatives will always choose conservatism.
I suspect they're worried about the constant death threats they're getting from Trump's loyal propaganda-crazed mob.Agreed. The Mueller report is quite clear that Trump lied and also gave unlawful orders. There is adequate grounds for impeachment, and yet the Democrats have been quite assertive in dodging that path.
Which is what?That is pretty funny considering how the left has acted the past decade.
The fact they can't accept a democratic election where they don't win.Which is what?
Just ask Glen Simpson, Hillary Clinton, Christopher Steele, Bruce Ohr, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, and others.
I think both parties are a bunch of pinkocommienaziwannabe eurotrashpanderingwarmongeringwheedlinglyingwhiningsorelosers .
You may apologize now.
I know the left has a lot to answer for.It's funny that the only the supporters of the party of racists, fascists, and assholes, are the only people that argue that both parties are the same.
It's simply true. without question.
Those that claim to be "party to none" and still argue the same, are worse than illiterate. These people are simply willful morons. They are to be laughed at and kicked in the street until unconscious.
He could certainly try, but Mueller also acknowledges that without underlying proof of collusion, the obstruction charge is tenuous, and Mueller also acknowledges the purview of the executive branch to directs its own resources in defense of itself.
You can set the goal post down over there and then fetch me a cup of water.
The only thing that is really open to interpretation is why Congress isn't upholding its Constitutional duties.
Criticizing the President because you disagree with his policies or methods is not undemocratic. Working within the Constitutional and legal systems to check a President's abuses of power (whether real or perceived) is also not undemocratic.The fact they can't accept a democratic election where they don't win.
Keep the faith.Well, they're in recess right at the moment, just for starters. It needs to be understood that impeachment by the House will likely not result in removal from office by the GOP Senate. I'm all in favor of making them own it but I'm not prepared to predict what kind of backlash could be conjured up from a failed attempt.
You resort to personal attacks when you can no longer support your argument. It’s quite predictable and tiresome.
Nobody is arguing that. You just don't like who won.Criticizing the President because you disagree with his policies or methods is not undemocratic. Working within the Constitutional and legal systems to check a President's abuses of power (whether real or perceived) is also not undemocratic.
Trying to suppress criticism of a President is undemocratic.
Yeah, if only they'd stop accusing the President of not being an American citizen because of skin color.I know the left has a lot to answer for.
Nobody did that either.Yeah, if only they'd stop accusing the President of not being an American citizen because of skin color.