Only in your echo chamber it did.
Only in your echo chamber it did.
Convicted in the Senate or not, an impeached President running for election is still an impeached President running for election.Well, they're in recess right at the moment, just for starters. It needs to be understood that impeachment by the House will likely not result in removal from office by the GOP Senate. I'm all in favor of making them own it but I'm not prepared to predict what kind of backlash could be conjured up from a failed attempt.
So you're saying it's undemocratic to not like who won? Did you think about that first?Nobody is arguing that. You just don't like who won.
Yes, they did. For 8 long years. With the current President at the forefront of those attacks every step of the way. Just because your memory sucks doesn't mean the rest of us have the same problem.Nobody did that either.
Convicted in the Senate or not, an impeached President running for election is still an impeached President running for election.
However, I am inclined to agree with the logic that getting the public off the Distracting Orange Clown and on to the issues that the People genuinely care about. But keep in mind, if the Dems take that route, Trump's campaign will make that a front and center campaign issue, with legions of trolls playing the 'The Democrat Congress didn't do anything about Trump" game. It will be the "Hillary cheated Bernie" of the 2020 campaign to keep swing voters disenchanted and at home.
Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.You mean reality? Is your bubble so fortified that you honestly aren't aware of trump being the birther in chief?
Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.
The trolls are trying to rewrite history.
Keep the faith.
Nobody is arguing that. You just don't like who won.
If the Mueller investigation led to discovery of a crime, then Trump would be prosecuted for that crime in addition to obstructing the investigation of it. Since there is no evidence of an underlying crime, the obstruction charge is tenuous.Tell me. Is it your opinion that if the Mueller investigation led to the discovery of a crime against Trump, then he would be guilty of obstruction?
Apology acceptedI've already supported my argument you dumb bitch and yet you haven't bothered providing anything to back up your claim.
At this point you are just another piece of shit troll.
ya, I'm thinking the whole of the GOP should be tested for AlzheimersYes, they did. For 8 long years. With the current President at the forefront of those attacks every step of the way. Just because your memory sucks doesn't mean the rest of us have the same problem.
there is a standing policy in the DOJ that they wont indict a sitting president so no, if they found a crime in all likelihood he would not be charged until he is out of office, no and ifs or buts.If the Mueller investigation led to discovery of a crime, then Trump would be prosecuted for that crime in addition to obstructing the investigation of it. Since there is no evidence of an underlying crime, the obstruction charge is tenuous.
This does not mean obstruction did not happen. It means obstruction becomes more difficult to prove. As I said earlier, Mueller also acknowledged that the President does have the authority and discretion to defend himself using the powers of his office. Prosecuting intent absent an underlying crime is an exercise in futility.
Mueller said as much. Does not exonerate but provides rationale for why he didn’t bury Trump or his sons on obstruction.
Oh because the Republicans pushed a new conspiracy theory and the candidate just "happened" to be black is just a big fat wet sloppy coincidence??Nobody did that either.
He doesn’t have to say ‘let’s obstruct justice’ for it to be a crime.
Yes, they did. For 8 long years. With the current President at the forefront of those attacks every step of the way. Just because your memory sucks doesn't mean the rest of us have the same problem.
True, but the nature of these charges are a bit unprecedented. Regardless, it doen’t change the fact that Mueller did clear Trump of collusion, and engaged the appropriate authorities to prosecute the members of Trump’s inner circle accused of financial and campaign law crimes uncovered by his investigation.there is a standing policy in the DOJ that they wont indict a sitting president so no, if they found a crime in all likelihood he would not be charged until he is out of office, no and ifs or buts.
we still don't know what in the sealed indictments and obstruction doesn't need the collusion/conspiracy charge to be valid.True, but the nature of these charges are a bit unprecedented. Regardless, it doen’t change the fact that Mueller did clear Trump of collusion, and engaged the appropriate authorities to prosecute the members of Trump’s inner circle accused of financial and campaign law crimes uncovered by his investigation.
Trump will most definitely face charges once he leaves office.
No it does not, which is why Mueller should testify before Congress, as his report did not provide a knockout blow.we still don't know what in the sealed indictments and obstruction doesn't need the collusion/conspiracy charge to be valid.
If the Mueller investigation led to discovery of a crime, then Trump would be prosecuted for that crime in addition to obstructing the investigation of it. Since there is no evidence of an underlying crime, the obstruction charge is tenuous.
This does not mean obstruction did not happen. It means obstruction becomes more difficult to prove. As I said earlier, Mueller also acknowledged that the President does have the authority and discretion to defend himself using the powers of his office. Prosecuting intent absent an underlying crime is an exercise in futility.
Mueller said as much. Does not exonerate but provides rationale for why he didn’t bury Trump or his sons on obstruction.
I believe he will and it will likely be damning to trumpNo it does not, which is why Mueller should testify before Congress, as his report did not provide a knockout blow.