Apparently, God was not watching the Game last night...

ImTyping

Banned
Aug 6, 2001
777
0
0
It is well-known in the sports world that the so-called "god squad" of the NFL was the group of religious souls that reside on the St. Louis Rams. Amazing that these so-called "Christians" could not act like good sports. In interviews directly after the game and detailed in reports like THIS ONE, Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk could not give props where props were due--they got their ashes kicked, and would not admit it...all they would admit to is playing poorly.

Funny how they credit "god" when they win, but only blame themselves when they lose.

Face it, "god squad"--you got beat by a better team on sunday. The Patriots hit harder, pursued better, and had a game plan that you could just not solved. You were out played and out-coached. Too bad the the members of the "god squad" are not man enough to admit that they tried their best and got beat by better men.

Better men, by the way, who did not mention god at all during the speeches after the game...

God must have been at church instead of watching the game on sunday.
 

rubix

Golden Member
Oct 16, 1999
1,302
2
0
people do that all the time. they say god saved them from death in september 11th attacks, guess he forgot a few 1000 others. he was probably too busy helping musicians write pop songs so they can win some awards.
 

NetworkDad

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2001
3,435
1
0


<< .... Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk could not give props where props were due--they got their ashes kicked, and would not admit it...all they would admit to is playing poorly.

Funny how they credit "god" when they win, but only blame themselves when they lose.

Face it, "god squad"--you got beat by a better team on sunday. The Patriots hit harder, pursued better, and had a game plan that you could just not solved. You were out played and out-coached. Too bad the the members of the "god squad" are not man enough to admit that they tried their best and got beat by better men.
God must have been at church instead of watching the game on sunday.
>>

\

Um, so they admitted they played poorly per your statement. Then in your next paragraph, "not man enought to admit they tried their best and got beat by better men."

WTF? Isn't that the same sh1t, different pile? What more do you want? I don't recall them complaining of any bad calls during the game, or anything else. They admitted it was their fault.
 

y2kc

Platinum Member
Sep 2, 2000
2,547
0
76


<< They admitted it was their fault >>



That's the whole point. The rams aren't giving the Patriots any credit for beating them, the win apparently had nothing to do with how well the Patriots played, but how poorly they (rams) did...it's sour grapes.
 

ImTyping

Banned
Aug 6, 2001
777
0
0
Link is fixed. Speaches was fixed. Sorry.

dc: bite me.

Ncc: is was NOT their fault that they lost...they lost because they played their best, and the other team played better. When one loses, it is classy to give props to the person that beat you. Apparently, the "god squad" has no class.
 

y2kc

Platinum Member
Sep 2, 2000
2,547
0
76


<< Apparently, the "god squad" has no class >>



Not a drop. All of that "dynasty" talk went to their heads. They obviously forgot the golden rule of football, "On any given Sunday......."
 

dc

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 1999
9,998
2
0
instead of creating just a thread to bring up the issue of poor sportsmanship, it's obvious you created this thread to antagonize christians. so therefore you = troll.

just calling it how i see it.
 

Cooltech2k

Banned
Feb 9, 2001
2,001
1
0


<< Dude, God is gonna kick yer ass. >>


People Have Been Telling me that for years.........

I Agree theat they Should Have admitted that they Got Beat By a Better Team, Ralther than making excuses for themselves...
 

ImTyping

Banned
Aug 6, 2001
777
0
0


<< instead of creating just a thread to bring up the issue of poor sportsmanship, it's obvious you created this thread to antagonize christians. >>



The fact that there seems to be a very real connection between poor sportsmanship and the religious affiliation of the LOSERS here makes the issue here not just poor sportsmanship, but poor sportsmanship of those who feel they need to set a "higher" example. Therefor, you==blind apologist.
 

dc

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 1999
9,998
2
0
haha, so you're saying there's a connection between christianity and poor sportsmanship in this situation. just because a few christians were poor sports must automatically mean all christians are poor sports, lol. talk about making weird assumptions and beating logic upside her head. and i'm the blind one...
 

ImTyping

Banned
Aug 6, 2001
777
0
0
No, I said that a particular group of theists are poor sports. Not that all theists are poor sports. YOU are the one who made that illogical leap. I call you blind because you are blindly supporting them just because they are theists. If I said that ALL theists are poor sports, you might have basis for an argument. But I did not. So you don't.
 

Dedpuhl

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
10,371
0
76


<<

<< Apparently, the "god squad" has no class >>



Not a drop. All of that "dynasty" talk went to their heads. They obviously forgot the golden rule of football, "On any given Sunday......."
>>




Exactly.
 

dc

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 1999
9,998
2
0
and when did i say i support them? i called them poor sports myself.

i didn't post to defend their bad behavior, but to point out your excessive theist bashing.
 

dc

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 1999
9,998
2
0
<<Too bad the the members of the "god squad" are not man enough to admit that they tried their best and got beat by better men.

Better men, by the way, who did not mention god at all during the speeches after the game...

God must have been at church instead of watching the game on sunday.
>>


and the way you presented your original post shows an attempt of "theist vs. atheist" comparison.
don't try to play innocent, intentionally or not, you choose words meant to antagonize theists.
 

Hanpan

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2000
4,812
0
0
They did play poorly but not that poorly.

300+ passing yards is quite impressive.

besides loosing by a field goal is hardly getting your ass kicked.
 

macka

Senior member
Apr 30, 2001
262
0
0


<< 0 besides loosing by a field goal is hardly getting your ass kicked. >>



i beg to differ.. pats dominated the game.. and hit much much harder.. and also considering that the rams were favored by 14.. they did get their asses kicked!

~macka
 

breezeman

Junior Member
Dec 8, 2001
11
0
0


<< is was NOT their fault that they lost...they lost because they played their best, and the other team played better. When one loses, it is classy to give props to the person that beat you. Apparently, the "god squad" has no class. >>



Couldn't agree more. If New England lost the game, I am sure they would have given credit to the better team. Why am i sure?, because they have been a class act all season. It goes to show how badly St. Louis was embarrassed by the loss. I don't think they underestimated New England going in, but they got shocked, not to mention beat up.

 

xirtam

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2001
4,693
0
0


<< Funny how the same Christian whiners here have no problem bashing Islam. >>



Where the heck did that come from?

And where in the world did the whole "god squad" thing come from? So you don't believe that God helps them win. So what? Do you think He's any more responsible for their losses? And what is this about them making excuses... when you're making excuses, you don't just "blame yourself." I thought the purpose of making excuses was to shun personal responsibility -- am I wrong?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |