Add iPhone 5 and 5s in the phonearena test and you'll see even then their methodology shows that battery life has improvedhttp://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Apple-iPhone-6-Review_id3796/page/4
its all over the place depending on the test methods
Add iPhone 5 and 5s in the phonearena test and you'll see even then their methodology shows that battery life has improved
Why?
You posted a slide from Intel showing how much the screen consumes, I guess we are seeing this here with a larger and higher resolution screen.Because it has a 3000mAh battery, 50% more or so than iPhone 6.
Because it has a 3000mAh battery, 50% more or so than iPhone 6.
Anyone notice how the Shield Tablet is like 6500 points lower than it should be?
Obviously we can see what happened.
Who says it should be higher?
^^^ Re: 6 plus gfx benchmark discussion about on-screen vs. off-screen
Considering how the A7 wowed everyone and the A8 has the benefit of a shrink, this is overall a pretty disappointing effort in my view.
What happened to all that ARM magic pixie dust that was supposed to leave Intel & x86 in its wake?
On the basis of the A8, I don't see ARM challenging x86 on the desktop, anytime soon.
Clearly Anandtech made a mistake in their 3DMark Unlimited Physics graph. The data point they listed as "NVIDIA Shield tablet" in the iPhone 6/6+ preview is actually the data for "NVIDIA Shield [portable]", while the actual Shield tablet Physics score is much higher in comparison.
A8 throttling: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2014/09/iphone-6-and-6-plus-in-deep-with-apples-thinnest-phones/3/
The reviewer also says that every day battery life on the 6 plus is better than what their review seems to show.
Indeed Anyway it's still better than A7.Apple sure have another definition of substained performance.
Why am I not surprised.