They ignored instruction 35 in part and 53 in whole. The wording they ignored was the same in both instructions and was as follows:
The foreman of the jury had this to say in a post trial interview regarding damages: "We wanted to make sure the message we sent was not just a slap on the wrist," and "We wanted to make sure it was sufficiently high to be painful, but not unreasonable."
This is another reason I think 22 hours is too short a time period. How exactly do you work out the effect of the infringement upon Apple and how do you come to a damages award that compensates Apple without punishing Samsung? It must be a nightmare to try and work out potential lost sales across all the devices found to have infringed. That is hard enough on its own let along working out validity as well. I think it should have been split. One trial to rule on validity and then another trial to work out infringement of those patents found valid in the first trial, this trial was too large in scope for any jury to come to a well informed decision.
Samsung made way more than $1B by infringing. If Samsung was charged per the directions it would have been at least +$2B fine.