Someone must put the Pentium and the i3 Haswell and Skylake to confirm that... Is really badly made for AMD APU's... To make it worse, seems that they (Iris Pro) are ALREADY BETTER compared to some low tier dGPU up to GTX 750 or R7 260.
I hate how their bar lengths seem arbitrary. Why is 22 fps on the 4770K given a longer bar than 27 fps on the 7870k?
You have to realize that core load is not actual threads running,it's core load OVER TIME,task manager juggles all available threads around on all available cores so as to not overheat/wear down the first core.I fell that Celerons, Pentium and even i3 and i5 U tier and i3 HW desktop chips will have a really awful time in this game.
ahahah, I love how you refer to the poster as IT! ahahha :thumbsup:wouldnt be surprised if he has some kind of relationship with the mods here. Alot of other people have had many infractions yet it doesnt get any.
Something is clearly quite weak. What is it in your opinion?
The memory config is simply listed as "8Gb" is that 2x4 or 1x8, because that makes a big difference. And with that strange chart stacking min+avg, that's a new one.
Dual channel and single channel do not have any big differences in performance for the vast majority of users, if that's what you meant.
Dual channel and single channel do not have any big differences in performance for the vast majority of users, if that's what you meant.
You generally need synthetics/benches to tell any difference.
wouldnt be surprised if he has some kind of relationship with the mods here. Alot of other people have had many infractions yet it doesnt get any.
why do they bench at Res 1280x720?
Here dragon Dogma arisen at 1920x1080 With low setting:
Thanks so much, this will make the forums enjoyable again.
Increasing the demand on anything will not yield in better performance. If it's a CPU bottleneck and you increase settings, you are not reducing CPU load, you're merely putting an additional load on the GPU the CPU load will be there all the same. The best you can hope to do if you have GPU power to spare, is achieve better visuals without losing any additional performance, but you will not gain performance.
EDIT: Also, as it relates to integrated graphics, increasing any settings, be it a GPU loading or CPU loading one, will most certainly reduce performance because both the CPU and GPU have a shared resource, that being memory bandwidth. edram equipped IGP's go a long way to alleviate this, so it would likely be even more advantageous for Intel over AMD.
Thanks so much, this will make the forums enjoyable again.
Interesting results in this game. game.gpu results
Iris pro destroys fastest AMD apu, while even HD530 is faster, especially minumums. Have a feeling the AMD apus are being held back by the cpu.
Of course, overall it just shows how inadequate APUs really are for any kind of serious gaming. Even at 720p only iris pro is able to average 30FPS.
What? APU integrated graphics framerates basically double with dual channel mem. That's the crazy part, so many single stick benchmarks on the web, almost like it's intentional.
Are that many people gaming with an IGP?
Interesting. Are there any benchmarks to show this framerate doubling merely from going to dual channel mode on the mobo?
Number of people who are using IGP for light gaming is definitely much higher than decade ago.Are that many people gaming with an IGP?
Interesting. Are there any benchmarks to show this framerate doubling merely from going to dual channel mode on the mobo?
Id say most igps aren't playing titles like this but Dota, lol, world of tanks, etc.I have no information to prove it, but my feeling is that most of those intel IGPs are laptops.