The reason AMD sells its APUs for so cheaply is precisely because of their performance/power characteristics. Do you honestly think AMD is a charity that "likes" selling 200mm^2+ silicon dies for 37-40% gross margin? NO!
You're comparing two products at completely different price segments. May as well compare Iris Pro with Hawaii, it's about as relevant as your comparison is considering it is closer in price to Hawaii than it is to Kaveri. Making the assertion that Iris Pro's successor somehow makes Intel a graphics leader is a ridiculous assertion and you know it.
I remember you making a thread about fanboyism on this forum a while ago. When you write statements like below, it's really hard to take what you're saying seriously. How about taking a more measured tone rather than a passive aggressive one designed to stir up a flame war.
AMD's much vaunted graphics lead has now largely evaporated and with the 2014 Intel lineup, AMD will be a clear #2 in graphics.
Not unexpected, but it's nice to see evidence that what many of us have been predicting for quite some time finally playing out.
Last edited: