That's a map of VA treatment facilities, not the location of defense industry plants.
Mere fact.
What you need to understand about US politics is that way too many people believe in & promulgate inflammatory crap accusations for which they have no proof whatsoever. Agent's claim of white welfare is just that, utter crapola.
You can figure it out for yourself rather easily. Start here-
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-...erica-2016-5/#1-lockheed-martin-corporation-1
Then go to their respective websites, establish the location of their facilities. Lockheed Martin is a great example. Metro Atlanta isn't exactly White, and neither are Metro Denver or Baltimore.
Agent is just playing his divisive "racist degens!" routine for all it's worth.
In no way does that support your assertion that defense spending is white welfare. Well, other than you doubling down on assertions you fail to prove.
While I generally agree that our defense spending does not address the needs of the people the assertion that contracting is racist by design doesn't pass the sniff test no matter how many times you repeat it.
Beyond that, all states other than DC & Hawaii are majority White with Mississippi, Georgia & Maryland being the least White.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_the_United_States#Race_and_ethnicity
Shee-it, Sherlock. Part of the reason low income whites are as poor as they are is because they're too proud to accept gubmint help when it would be to their benefit. They hate the idea of ending up on welfare. They'd see themselves as failures.
That's a map of VA treatment facilities, not the location of defense industry plants.
Mere fact.
I don't think you're too dumb to see the ethnic difference between military spending recipients and means based welfare ones. In fact, you rather tacitly tried to excuse that difference by theorizing that white people are somehow too proud to take brown welfare:
I supposed that's good a reason as any to give them far superior make-work handouts.
I also don't think you're too dumb to figure that VA facilities correlate to where soldiers tend to reside, in contrast to where means-based welfare recipients do. If anything, actual defense/mil facilities are even less prone to be in poor parts of cities.
You go on like a right winger, never admitting to have been mistaken. About anything. Veterans' hospitals are mostly for veterans, not active duty-
https://www.va.gov/HEALTHBENEFITS/access/active_duty.asp
Their location is independent of military basing or defense contractor facilities. Here in Metro Denver there's a small reserve airbase east of town & Ft Carson 60 miles to the south with the Fitzsimmons regional VA hospital campus in Aurora, right on the light rail line & a major bus route.
Your original claim that Defense contractor facilities are a form of white welfare remains unsupported.
No, you literally go on like buckshot, playing too dumb to understand the simplest things and nitpick at the most trite trivialities if need be. Keep pretending defense facilities are urban to protect your precious conservatives. All those military bases and factories in the inner city, lol.
Your desperation to avoid proving your claims isn't trivial- it's obvious. You couldn't prove your claim that defense spending is racist white welfare if your life depended upon it.
No, just like buckshot you'll forever play too dumb to ever understand why the selfish and racially resentful would choose to fund a type of welfare which disproportionately benefit white rural areas far more than welfare that actually goes to poor (brown) people.
Now you can empathize with buckshot and understand why he did what he did; defending the master race against all comers isn't easy.
Linky-linky.
I'm not looking to "educate" buckshot types in a futile exercise over the next 100 pages. You know exactly why the "defense" white welfare budget far surpasses that of brown welfare.
You're already engaged in a futile exercise of accusation w/o evidence.
I'm inclined to believe the experts, the ones who have all the information. That's a judgement call, and the reason Congress supports Mueller's investigation to put together more evidence. This isn't a partisan thing. It's an issue of national security simply because we can't have a President who's compromised by any foreign govt, let alone the Russian Oligarchy. They're what La Cosa Nostra always wanted to be.
So far as the actual topic is concerned, Dems are obviously better than Repubs simply because we didn't elect Donald Trump. I figure the delicious taste of liberal tears is already turning bitter...
You aren't smart enough to either craft such a message let alone understand what she was saying.
Oh, I know what she was saying. She was moving her lips to get more votes, she just screwed up on her calculation of the backlash. For someone who rehearses so well, she slipped up, and it cost her. She just doesn't have the charisma and slickness of Ol Billy, and she doesn't have the Bummer BS Aura. Gotta stay on script Billary...
The experts...lol... Doesn't really surprise me a bit though, the Rep party has at least as much to lose, if not more, by allowing Trump to follow his agenda. Containment by diminished support works very well and provides a great cover. Rep and Dem parties can unofficially cooperate on this, just like their traitor level handling of immigration - when they both want something, man, it happens!
LOL, I doubt it'll ever turn as bitter as watching Billary get annointed.