I think its pretty clear violence is the answer. Violence is how all the bigly people do things.
The fight for women's suffrage includes violence and protest
How a Riot Helped to Ratify the 19th amendment
https://blog.education.nationalgeog...w-a-riot-helped-to-ratify-the-19th-amendment/
I beg to differ on the differences being immaterial or ridiculous to fight for. There's a big difference between our current system and the universal safety net this country requires. Small tweaks to the status quo won't draw in the hope for change voters. It won't help them enough to provide economic security, leaving them vulnerable to Trumpsters.
- Foreign Policy: Pro War VS Anti War.
- Trade: Pro TPP VS Anti TPP.
- Healthcare: ACA VS Medicare for All.
- Wall Street: Friendly VS Adversarial.
- Thematic Message: Identity VS Economic.
When trickle down ends the GOP, those differences will be the gap between the next Conservative Party and Progressives.
Anyways, as you ask "Are Democrats better?" We might want to know which Democrats you're asking for. Blue Dogs? Progressives? The Wall Street backed leadership? My point was that there is a variety and breadth to to term Democrat. And of course someone on the "Left" is going to say Democrats are better. But the answer is without nuance, as is the question you posed.
/Hands you your personalized antifa kit: Molotov cocktail maker, pepper spray, rocks, soda cans filled with cement, baseball bat.
Go get 'em, tiger! Beat the sh*t out of anyone that dares to disagree with you then pat yourself on the back for your moral superiority.
NOTE: I'll be adding the following to my sig -
'If we adopt the ways of the Nazis, doesn't that make us as bad as the Nazis?' - Star Trek, TOS: episode "Patterns of Force"
I think its pretty clear violence is the answer. Violence is how all the bigly people do things.
I beg to differ on the differences being immaterial or ridiculous to fight for. There's a big difference between our current system and the universal safety net this country requires. Small tweaks to the status quo won't draw in the hope for change voters. It won't help them enough to provide economic security, leaving them vulnerable to Trumpsters.
- Foreign Policy: Pro War VS Anti War.
- Trade: Pro TPP VS Anti TPP.
- Healthcare: ACA VS Medicare for All.
- Wall Street: Friendly VS Adversarial.
- Thematic Message: Identity VS Economic.
When trickle down ends the GOP, those differences will be the gap between the next Conservative Party and Progressives.
Anyways, as you ask "Are Democrats better?" We might want to know which Democrats you're asking for. Blue Dogs? Progressives? The Wall Street backed leadership? My point was that there is a variety and breadth to to term Democrat. And of course someone on the "Left" is going to say Democrats are better. But the answer is without nuance, as is the question you posed.
I think its pretty clear violence is the answer. Violence is how all the bigly people do things.
These are pretty good instances of clever conservative political strategy previously mentioned:
Sewing discord within D party ranks by hyping up the candidate behind in the primaries.
Or what nazis & friends preach before they strike.
You are correct. Nazis and friends advocate for violence, so you better kill them before they kill you right?
They advocate violence, hate, destroying entire races and religions.Are you truly confused about why they must be stopped?You are correct. Nazis and friends advocate for violence, so you better kill them before they kill you right?
Seems obvious whether the world would've been far better off had something been done about the nazis prior to their ascension. Also obvious which side of that argument nazis & friends are on.
They advocate violence, hate, destroying entire races or religions.Are you truly confused about why they must be stopped?
Did you just advocate for non-violence? Wow, that is a new trick for you.
I think a key difference between democrats and conservatives is that many of the former will understand this while nearly all of the latter will forever play too dumb to.
Look at my post history of you believe I advocate violence. I do not... Hence the reason I said "stopped", not beaten or killed.Its sad that you think the only way to stop them is with their methods. Hopefully not everyone is as far gone.
Look at my post history of you believe I advocate violence. I do not... Hence the reason I said "stopped", not beaten or killed.
But I'm sorry you're sad.
LOL, what an unfortunate condition....... disease?Just a heads up that conservatives are prone to channeling buckshot.
I beg to differ on the differences being immaterial or ridiculous to fight for. There's a big difference between our current system and the universal safety net this country requires. Small tweaks to the status quo won't draw in the hope for change voters. It won't help them enough to provide economic security, leaving them vulnerable to Trumpsters.
- Foreign Policy: Pro War VS Anti War.
- Trade: Pro TPP VS Anti TPP.
- Healthcare: ACA VS Medicare for All.
- Wall Street: Friendly VS Adversarial.
- Thematic Message: Identity VS Economic.
When trickle down ends the GOP, those differences will be the gap between the next Conservative Party and Progressives.
Anyways, as you ask "Are Democrats better?" We might want to know which Democrats you're asking for. Blue Dogs? Progressives? The Wall Street backed leadership? My point was that there is a variety and breadth to to term Democrat. And of course someone on the "Left" is going to say Democrats are better. But the answer is without nuance, as is the question you posed.
These are pretty good instances of clever conservative political strategy previously mentioned:
Sewing discord within D party ranks by hyping up the candidate behind in the primaries.
Look at my post history of you believe I advocate violence. I do not... Hence the reason I said "stopped", not beaten or killed.
But I'm sorry you're sad.
Because the distinct difference between the two sides is that the hate groups advocate a whole hell of a lot more than just simply violence...So then tell me, if I said violence it's not the answer, and you think violence is not the only option, then why did you question if I wanted to stop them? Strange question to ask me on context.
Every liberal author promoting the idea that Bernie was better than Hillary after Hillary won the primary is squarely in the dumbshit category and every bit as much to blame for Trump as any other degenerate pulling the lever for him.Salon.com, conservative bastion sewing discord within D party ranks?
Maybe you have a point to ask if Democrats are better, given the vitriol surrounding identity politics. When the term "chasing the great white male" is tossed around, that sort of racist division has no place among the enlightened - as you'd say, yet there it is. Those are the regressive tendencies I pointed to in my first post. There are dangerous consequences when involved in identity politics, in division as opposed to providing a positive and uplifting message. Of providing unity through hope and change.
President Obama showed the way forward, but that incredible message from 2008 has been discarded for something repugnant.
Democrats are better, but they also need to hope again, and push forward with open arms for all who will follow us unto the breach.
We don't need more of this.
Obviously if I think it's a waste of time to try honest discussion with degenerates that means I want to personally go around hurting people and destroying property. /degenerate logic/Hands you your personalized antifa kit: Molotov cocktail maker, pepper spray, rocks, soda cans filled with cement, baseball bat.
Go get 'em, tiger! Beat the sh*t out of anyone that dares to disagree with you then pat yourself on the back for your moral superiority.
NOTE: I'll be adding the following to my sig -
'If we adopt the ways of the Nazis, doesn't that make us as bad as the Nazis?' - Star Trek, TOS: episode "Patterns of Force"
When I post something stupid or make mistakes I admit my error, apologize and work to avoid repeating the same mistake again like a decent human being. Degenerates like jmagg will never admit their error because their ego is more important than being right or decent.Hi Pot, how've you been?
Every liberal author promoting the idea that Bernie was better than Hillary after Hillary won the primary is squarely in the dumbshit category and every bit as much to blame for Trump as any other degenerate pulling the lever for him.
Obviously if I think it's a waste of time to try honest discussion with degenerates that means I want to personally go around hurting people and destroying property. /degenerate logic