As we move towards more efficient chipsets, CPU's, and RAM chips, the trend for faster, more efficient, and cooler running technologies continues. We've seen TDP drop on CPU's considerably, DRAM package sizes shrink, and controllers become more efficient on a per cycle basis. With these reductions, there have been reductions in cooling and power requirements also.
I searched on the forums and found an article from back in 2010 on Heat Spreaders for RAM, but I wanted to pose the question in a 2015 world:
Are RAM Heat Spreaders in today's world nothing but snake oil? Are they a remnant of a time where they once made a difference, but now are only used for minor perception-based benefits at an extra cost to the consumer?
Please keep in mind: I don't overclock, nor plan to. My question comes from a non-overclockers perspective.
I also wonder how much difference heat spreaders actually make, if any? Sure they spread the heat out more, reducing RAM hotspots (if those even exist), but they also tend to reduce the amount of space between each RAM socket, potentially reducing air flow that would carry away heat.
What are your thoughts?
I searched on the forums and found an article from back in 2010 on Heat Spreaders for RAM, but I wanted to pose the question in a 2015 world:
Are RAM Heat Spreaders in today's world nothing but snake oil? Are they a remnant of a time where they once made a difference, but now are only used for minor perception-based benefits at an extra cost to the consumer?
Please keep in mind: I don't overclock, nor plan to. My question comes from a non-overclockers perspective.
I also wonder how much difference heat spreaders actually make, if any? Sure they spread the heat out more, reducing RAM hotspots (if those even exist), but they also tend to reduce the amount of space between each RAM socket, potentially reducing air flow that would carry away heat.
What are your thoughts?