Originally posted by: Ornery
It's not extortion, it's their trademark. That's what you pay for, to get a trademark appropriated. What's the point, if somebody else can come along and use it without any regard for your rights? They settled before because they were wrong, and will settle or lose this time, because they are wrong.
This is also similar to the debacle between Microsoft and Lindows, except Michael Robertson is crazy (stupid?) and rich (stupid?) enough to take the bull by the horns. And while he has lost in Europe, federal judges are still wrangling over whether you can trademark a generic term like "Windows" or "Apple."
If you honestly believe that the Apple Computer mark and/or products is confusingly similar to the Applecorps mark and/or products, than I don't really have any beef with you. There are no records or CDs anywhere with the Apple Computer logo on them. Just iTunes, a service that allows a user to download files.
But I have never confused the two and I can't imagine how a reasonable person would. My assertion is that
Apple Computer did NOT use
Applecorp's trademark any more than
Appleby Systems has. Yet I haven't heard Applecorps suing Appleby.
My assertion is that Apple Computer is not in the wrong. They did not settle out because they were in the wrong, they settled out because they could not afford to litigate. They may well have won in court, but been bankrupted in the process.
They will settle out again, for financial reasons, although this time because more content available on iTunes means more songs to download - a win-win situation both for Apple and Applecorps.
But I believe that Applecorps is hardly interested in defending their trademark.