I've owned 6970s previously and I was able to get the max, 950 fairly easily. However, the cayman doesn't scale very well with oc'ing, unfortunately. It may not be worth the hassle.
If I didn't own 1000+ stocks I would say that buying 3 is quite stupid. Since I own lots of stock, Are you sure you only want 3?
UPDATE: Just tried. Erm... unless I'm supposed to reboot my system, AB only allowed up to 840/1325 as well, with no voltage control.
Disabled OverDrive, still the same.
I tried Trixx and it allows further OCing and voltage control. Well, seems AB wasn't for me, but Trixx'll do great. How far 'should' it go?
Cutting into profit margins is a horrible mistake no matter how you look at it. Yeah its great for people who don't want to spend the money for a 6970 but not for amd
Sorry, but you assume a lot of things you have no facts to back. Those who bought a 6950 instead of a 6970 would have likely bought one anyway. Just like the 5850 before it, O/C'ing the 6950 brought it close enough to the 6970 that most enthusiasts knowledgeable enough to unlock their cards would have bought 6950's anyway. By them being unlockable helped keep their price higher. They probably would have been a $200 card a while ago if they didn't unlock.
Shoot for 1Ghz core
Nope. Gonna wait for nVidia to drop their 600 series.
I voted yes but i'm waiting for MSI lightning or ASUS dc2. I want a fancy VRM and aftermarket cooling.
blackened23 is right in my view. I just tried 900/1350 and I only got about 2FPS more than I did versus 840/1325. From 800/1250 to 840/1325, I got around 7 [perhaps 8] FPS more. I don't know why...
In The Witcher 2 that is. [I played the same scene of course].
I should have asked. What processor are you running?
Come on 3D. Your going to actually say that people didn't rush out in droves to get a 6950 once they heard it unlocked? Amd lost a lot of sales because of that unlocking fiasco.
Over at Overclock. Let me find the link
http://www.overclock.net/t/1192539/fud-amd-hd-7950-wont-show-up-on-january-9th
Speculation is that amd doesn't want to make the same mistake it did with the 6950
Originally Posted by G woodlogger
Either the yield are bad or TMSC/AMD makes a lot more money on them than 69xx, I just see it as a consumer. The die are smaller and therefore cheaper to make. It is as simple as that.
May be they need it for future development, i don't know.
Just one random guy's speculation.
That forum has some interesting people....
Someone hire this guy, he has a clearer grasp of the economics of semiconductor processing than anyone else I've seen.
Clearly 14 of you are insane. INSANE I say! 7970 is horrible performance/$! Outrageous! No one is going to buy this card. ()
Abstaining from voting as I am waiting for the MSI Lightning 7970, unless it comes out on Monday too :thumbsup:
nope, getting second 6950 as soon as those that bought this card sell there old video card
That's not going to happen, because they're going to call it the 700 series to keep up with AMD. Good look hoping Nvidia can counter, AMD can do a massive OC'd card and possibly a respin by the time Nvidia gets out the door.
^^^ It's a brand new process. There could well be a lot of start up expenses that need to be considered. As a process matures it gets cheaper. 40nm and larger are mature processes. We don't know that early 28nm chips are cheaper to produce.