Obviously he used his eyes and that is all that counts, what he can see. Why would he care about a test when it's what his eyes show him that counts.
Did you use your eyes...or did you actually measure it?
You know...like this:
http://techreport.com/articles.x/21516
Did you use your eyes...or did you actually measure it?
You know...like this:
http://techreport.com/articles.x/21516
Obviously he used his eyes and that is all that counts, what he can see. Why would he care about a test when it's what his eyes show him that counts.
In regard to what? The limiter or 50+fps? For the limiter, I measured the frametimes and generally I trust my eyes. I'm very very picky about stuttering.
So it is your subjetive perception, gotcha.
But microstutter is still there.
A shame more sites don't use techport's method to measuring microstutter...microstutter is a killer for me and excludes multi-GPU.
Not in all cases. Vsync lessens the load on the GPUs but if you fall below 40 or so due to demanding settings, microstutter can an will still occur. Microstutter happens, when the GPUs stress is high.
What do you want from me? The stutter is clearly there, I can make some benchmarks later if you don't believe me.
It's really simple.
Different pepole perceive microstutter differently.
some people apparently not perceive it at all, whyle others perceive it loud and clear.
So I need to know if he used his subjective eyes...or the objetive frame times.
As the microstutter dosn't need to be gone, just because he dosn't perceive it any longer.
I'm with you. I can not stand microstutter. I'm baffled how some people can't pick up on it. I find it to be very distracting. It has been proved time and time again by reputable reviewers and users across the board to exist and be detrimental to the gaming experience.
Well there is an important caveat to that, it's been proven to exist, no one is arguing that.
But the way it affects one user to the next is completely subjective and cannot be quantified and trying to tell someone what the experience is like or will be like for them is pointless for the aforementioned reason.
I only notice it in a couple games out of the many I own and I mean exactly two when I say a couple. For you it's obviously a different experience. So there is nothing consistent about how it will affect different people at all. The best advice would be try multi-gpu and see if you find anything about it to be off.
That is why I need graphs...because I pick it up right away.
The same way I dislike the I.Q. of LDC's...my visual acuity is not 20/20 but 20/15 (US term) or 150% (EU term)
Well there is an important caveat to that, it's been proven to exist, no one is arguing that.
But the way it affects one user to the next is completely subjective and cannot be quantified and trying to tell someone what the experience is like or will be like for them is pointless for the aforementioned reason.
I only notice it in a couple games out of the many I own and I mean exactly two when I say a couple. For you it's obviously a different experience. So there is nothing consistent about how it will affect different people at all. The best advice would be try multi-gpu and see if you find anything about it to be off.
I understand your stance.
Knowledge of the issue is all I'm trying to convey.
Some people blindly recommend and argue that 460 sli is a much better buy than a lone 580 because they usually produce a similar/slightly higher frame rate not to mention memory differences.
7970s are live at newegg. 549.99.
7970s are live at newegg. 549.99.
599$ for a factory overclocked 7970 from XFX @ 1ghz core. Looks like more non-reference designs won't take long.