One other thought. The size of the ark, the length of the storm and the depth of the water are all from the bible. Are you suggesting that the bible is wrong or is basic multiplication wrong?
Straw man much?
I'm suggesting that you're wrong.One other thought. The size of the ark, the length of the storm and the depth of the water are all from the bible. Are you suggesting that the bible is wrong or is basic multiplication wrong?
Yes, that would be absolutely ridiculous levels of rain fall. Too bad that isn't what anybody thinks happened.
Measuring the ratios of samples is pretty straight forward.
I'm suggesting that you're wrong.
Read the account yourself. You can figure it out.About what specifically is he wrong about? Be specific.
Do you realize how stupid this sounds? Is natural gas less dense than the rock above it?Oh.... the fountains of the deep....... because less dense material like water can defy gravity and rest beneath more dense material like FUCKING granite. Yea we have ample evidence of that....... Once again uniformity broken by creationists....
Persistent, huh? I believe the ratios can be accurately measured.:sneaky:That is not what I asked. Do you believe carbon dating is real? Not that the theory exists or that you understand it, but that you believe it works.
Wouldn't rain rates that high atomize pretty much everything? Would that be like a fireman's hose (500 gpm) or even worse?
How did you calculate volume needed? Have you read the account or are you just assuming you know what it says?In gallons per minute it's equal to:
170,000,000 GPM......
I'd have to think about it atomizing everything. I think it might depend on whether there was so much water that it was like a fire hose or if there was still enough air mixed in that the water falls like normal rain drops. I'm leaning towards atomized.
Persistent, huh? I believe the ratios can be accurately measured.:sneaky:
In gallons per minute it's equal to:
170,000,000 GPM......
I'd have to think about it atomizing everything. I think it might depend on whether there was so much water that it was like a fire hose or if there was still enough air mixed in that the water falls like normal rain drops. I'm leaning towards atomized.
How did you calculate volume needed? Have you read the account or are you just assuming you know what it says?
I hope you don't use natural gas to heat your house because it totally doesn't exist if gravity is what keeps it in the earth.Good fucking god! ROFLMAO! Hundreds of thousands of times more powerful than a fire hydrant.
It must be those fountains of the deep then.... because gravity didn't work on water before the flood...
You haven't read the account. My calculations wouldn't make sense to you.I'd be curious to see your math on the same question (amount of rain fall needed over 40 days to flood the Earth.) You said you are very proficient in mathematics earlier in the thread. You seem to believe in the Noah's Ark story, so surely you'd want to use your mathematic ability to further understand the conditions in which Noah found himself, correct? A curious mind like yourself would want to know that.
You haven't read the account. My calculations wouldn't make sense to you.
Read the account. Your last sentence tells me that you don't know what you're talking about. Educate yourself.Humor me then. I may not understand them, but I'd love to read through them. Maybe someone else in this thread could help me understand your calculations, we don't know until you post them.
Remember, we are talking about the amount of rain fall needed over a 40 day interval to flood the earth.
Read the account. Your last sentence tells me that you don't know what you're talking about. Educate yourself.
Read the account. Your last sentence tells me that you don't know what you're talking about. Educate yourself.
I think I won't. He can find the account quite easily and realize where his error is.Just answer the question.
I think I won't. He can find the account quite easily and realize where his error is.
Find it yourself and read it and come back and tell me what you found. Then tell me if Paratus' calculations represent what the account says. Any further requests will be ignored, educate yourself.Please explain and post a link, thanks.
Find it yourself and read it and come back and tell me what you found. Then tell me if Paratus' calculations represent what the account says. Any further requests will be ignored, educate yourself.