Arma's horrible performance has forever been tied to the way it interacts with the server. Better servers = higher fps. Bad server = low fps. Seems like great engine design to me.
And?
His E-peen is cleary hurt.
It's the same whine as back when Crysis came out.
People whined over it shattered their E-peen rigs.
Crutek dumbed down the I.Q. in Crysis Warhead as an result.
That made people whine over the lower I.Q.
There is NO other game out there doing what ARMA3 does...it's scale is massive.
Whining over a game because you don't understand the engine is bad, mkay.
I think what Lonbtroll doesn't understand about Arma 3 is that the game loads both GPUs in the 30-40% area and the CPU in the 20-30% area.
Of course it's Alpha, so we'll see how the full game evolves.
You know how the engine works right?
I hope you do, after speaking out about the performance.
Not doing so would be...hillarious.
So you are joking right?
Not really serious...I hope?
You know how the engine works right?
I hope you do, after speaking out about the performance.
Not doing so would be...hillarious.
So you are joking right?
Not really serious...I hope?
the Great, He Who Knows All, do educate us lowly peons about the technical inner workings of the engine. I'm curious. School us.
Oh Lonbjerg the Great, He Who Knows All, do educate us lowly peons about the technical inner workings of the engine. I'm curious. School us.
Let try this:
What part of the render should be improved and how?
If you cannot answer that question...you don't have the relevant information to make any jugdements...
Still awaiting your enlightenment on the Arma engine, not smart ass sarcasm. Thanks!
People whining over CPU load (people dosn't get how the beast called multitrehding works) because their rig cannot offer WTFPWND 100% load, should start reading up...before posting crap and blaming others:
http://www.bistudio.com/index.php/company/developers-blog/91-real-virtuality-going-multicore
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl's_law
http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?t=100519
http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?100519-exThreads&p=1797139#post1797139
People expecting +50% CPU load on all cores really don't get multithreadning...but still insist on whining.
ARMA2 could use 31 threads.
That dosn't mean every thread had the same workload, the real World result were this:
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,687620/ArmA-2-tested-Benchmarks-with-18-CPUs/Reviews/
It is for running ARMA3 aplpha at 60 FPS...are you callning him a liar?
The is hilarious.
Someone makes a game that runs a +150 FPS, people whine over stagnation of games.
Someone makes a game that unpossible to run at 60 FPS, people whine over it's "unoptimized", "sloopy code".
:whiste:
And?
His E-peen is cleary hurt.
It's the same whine as back when Crysis came out.
People whined over it shattered their E-peen rigs.
Crutek dumbed down the I.Q. in Crysis Warhead as an result.
That made people whine over the lower I.Q.
There is NO other game out there doing what ARMA3 does...it's scale is massive.
Whining over a game because you don't understand the engine is bad, mkay.
I'd like to try it, if I may.
Lite version is SP-only, yes?
That's where the series really loses me. Your character should be an extension of your body, and you should not have to think so hard about getting it to do the simplest things.
I have two alpha codes if anyone wants to check it out. PM steam name. First come first serve.
Thanks for that, I saved myself some money. It's more of the clunky mess that Arma 2 was.
I love the stance adjustment system in the game, but it's still so clunky. You're supposed to be a highly trained soldier, so it shouldn't be a case of reinventing the wheel to use cover properly. Take far cry 3 for example. You go in cover and your guy automatically adjusts his stance to shoot over cover. If bohemia did that the game would be great, but instead you have to use 3 button combinations to do what should be a mindless task for a trained soldier.
It's a simulation, so they should simulate how easy it is for me to control my own body. Not this crap where it's like a toddler learning to walk every time you want to do something in the game.
Ahh...the CoD-syndrome surfaces...
Ahh...the CoD-syndrome surfaces...
Cover in arma 3 is very situational. Unlike in far cry or gears of war the place from which thou are attacked changes dramatically. What was cover and minimal exposure pretty soon becomes no cover at all. With such a wide avenue of possibilities you have to be in charge of your stance with a high degree of accuracy. The system as it stands is IMO excellent, it solves a big problem with the previous game and moves at a semi realistic pace, which is after what we want. The animation is fluid, but it takes longer than doing things in other games, not because its not smooth but because its based in reality on how quickly you can change your stance.