- Feb 3, 2003
- 2,696
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
same with the Gulf War Syndrome.
The goverment is already funding research on it.
As for the bush part I find that most amusing. So what if he went AWOL? How many other people did? He is afraid of horses? So? Looks like a little bit of bush bashing to me.
Originally posted by: Tabb
I disagree with the first part. Bad food, dude your in a fscking forgien contrey suck it up bitch. No water? Your in the military pussy. The second part I entirely agree with, why the budget cuts? Not to mention most in the military get paid absolute sh1t. Yes, you do have housing, food paid for but wheres the rest of the money? If I am going to serve my contrey and poteinally get killed I deserve something. The uranium part is false same with the Gulf War Syndrome. The goverment is already funding research on it. As for the bush part I find that most amusing. So what if he went AWOL? How many other people did? He is afraid of horses? So? Looks like a little bit of bush bashing to me.[\Q]
To address the food part, I was reading an article yesterday saying that while out troops were still eating MRE's the italians were eating much more substantial food, and our troops were trading as much as possible for it, I dunno what they would trade tho, I doubt it was the MRE's heh. I don't see any reason to make them suffer, it is already one of the longest tours of duty in recent history, if the Italians can get real food over there, why can't we?
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
So are you saying no depleted Uranium was used?
Depleted Uranium is everywhere? It is? No it isnt.
same with the Gulf War Syndrome.
...and there's no such thing as Gulf War Syndrome?
What is false?
I dont see how the goverment can be denying it if they are funding research for it
The goverment is already funding research on it.
Huh? Which one? Why would they do that if they're false?
Our goverment
As for the bush part I find that most amusing. So what if he went AWOL? How many other people did? He is afraid of horses? So? Looks like a little bit of bush bashing to me.
Going AWOL and being afraid of horses seemed to be mentioned as points related to the image displayed above the text from a news site which showed Bush as he encouraged attackers to "bring it on".
So whats your point? He encourged attackers to bring it on?
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
Depleted Uranium is everywhere? No it isnt.
same with the Gulf War Syndrome.
I dont see how the goverment can be denying it if they are funding research for it
As for the bush part I find that most amusing. So what if he went AWOL? How many other people did? He is afraid of horses? So? Looks like a little bit of bush bashing to me.
Going AWOL and being afraid of horses seemed to be mentioned as points related to the image displayed above the text from a news site which showed Bush as he encouraged attackers to "bring it on".
So whats your point? He encourged attackers to bring it on?
about the second link, the UK gov said they would start cleaning it up in south Iraq right after the war, was a program about this on bbc world serviceOriginally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
Depleted Uranium is everywhere? No it isnt.
same with the Gulf War Syndrome.
I dont see how the goverment can be denying it if they are funding research for it
Remains of toxic bullets litter Iraq.
Government denial
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
So are you saying no depleted Uranium was used?
Depleted Uranium is everywhere? It is? No it isnt.
As the citizens of Iraq try to rebuild their war-ravaged country, there's another potential problem looming. Depleted uranium from munitions used during the war by Coalition troops is scattered around the nation and the Coalition has no plans to clean it up.
Significantly, one of the biggest critics of the American policy on depleted uranium is a former US Army scientist who was in charge of cleaning up radioactive waste after the first Gulf War. Doug Rokke served as a physicist with the Third US Army Medical Command, and he spoke to Edmond Roy.
DOUG ROKKE: Well in the whole areas we know that the health effects not only on the US forces that participated in Gulf War I, the US Department of Veteran Affairs, in a report that was issued in last September of 2002, confirmed that over 221,000 of America's sons and daughters that participated in Gulf War I are now suffering serious adverse health effects, to the point where they're on permanent disability and well over 10,000 is dead.
But we're seeing those same proportions in all the Coalition forces, but in the areas where the uranium munitions were used and all the contamination was left, and all the other contamination was left from the total destruction of an infrastructure, we're seeing absolutely devastating health effects on those populations, both the military but more important the non-combatants, the women and children of the region.
Originally posted by: Tabb
I disagree with the first part. Bad food, dude your in a fscking forgien contrey suck it up bitch. No water? Your in the military pussy. The second part I entirely agree with, why the budget cuts? Not to mention most in the military get paid absolute sh1t. Yes, you do have housing, food paid for but wheres the rest of the money? If I am going to serve my contrey and poteinally get killed I deserve something. The uranium part is false same with the Gulf War Syndrome. The goverment is already funding research on it. As for the bush part I find that most amusing. So what if he went AWOL? How many other people did? He is afraid of horses? So? Looks like a little bit of bush bashing to me.
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
So are you saying no depleted Uranium was used?
Depleted Uranium is everywhere? It is? No it isnt.
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2003/s882745.htm
As the citizens of Iraq try to rebuild their war-ravaged country, there's another potential problem looming. Depleted uranium from munitions used during the war by Coalition troops is scattered around the nation and the Coalition has no plans to clean it up.
Significantly, one of the biggest critics of the American policy on depleted uranium is a former US Army scientist who was in charge of cleaning up radioactive waste after the first Gulf War. Doug Rokke served as a physicist with the Third US Army Medical Command, and he spoke to Edmond Roy.
DOUG ROKKE: Well in the whole areas we know that the health effects not only on the US forces that participated in Gulf War I, the US Department of Veteran Affairs, in a report that was issued in last September of 2002, confirmed that over 221,000 of America's sons and daughters that participated in Gulf War I are now suffering serious adverse health effects, to the point where they're on permanent disability and well over 10,000 is dead.
But we're seeing those same proportions in all the Coalition forces, but in the areas where the uranium munitions were used and all the contamination was left, and all the other contamination was left from the total destruction of an infrastructure, we're seeing absolutely devastating health effects on those populations, both the military but more important the non-combatants, the women and children of the region.
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
The uranium part is false
Depleted Uranium is everywhere? No it isnt.
same with the Gulf War Syndrome.
I dont see how the goverment can be denying it if they are funding research for it
Remains of toxic bullets litter Iraq.
Government denial
As for the bush part I find that most amusing. So what if he went AWOL? How many other people did? He is afraid of horses? So? Looks like a little bit of bush bashing to me.
Going AWOL and being afraid of horses seemed to be mentioned as points related to the image displayed above the text from a news site which showed Bush as he encouraged attackers to "bring it on".
So whats your point? He encourged attackers to bring it on?
Are you really having this much trouble with this one? It's not really so complicated.
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
Originally posted by: Tabb
Yes my simple is..
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
And who started those fires?
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
Yes my simple is..
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
And who started those fires?
Your simple is that your pretty sure Gulf War Syndrome is caused by oil well fires? Can you tell me what led you to this conclusion?
Originally posted by: etech
What is this "afraid of horses" thing that is being spewed?
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
Yes my simple is..
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
And who started those fires?
Your simple is that your pretty sure Gulf War Syndrome is caused by oil well fires? Can you tell me what led you to this conclusion?
Well, my conclusion is that there isnt any proof either way, so people should stop jumping to conclusions, unless you want to take as gospel a report generated by Saddam's government, which also refused when WHO volunteered to investigate. If you want to do that, I've got a couple of bridges to sell you
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
Yes my simple is..
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
And who started those fires?
Your simple is that you're pretty sure Gulf War Syndrome is caused by oil well fires? Can you tell me what led you to this conclusion?
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
Yes my simple is..
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
And who started those fires?
Your simple is that your pretty sure Gulf War Syndrome is caused by oil well fires? Can you tell me what led you to this conclusion?
Well, my conclusion is that there isnt any proof either way, so people should stop jumping to conclusions, unless you want to take as gospel a report generated by Saddam's government, which also refused when WHO volunteered to investigate. If you want to do that, I've got a couple of bridges to sell you
And until there is a mountain of evidence that manages to convince you otherwise, everyone should assume that depleted uranium is a healthy snack right?
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: Tabb
Yes my simple is..
And of course this has nothing to do with the fact that these people had to breathe in the smoke from all those oil well fires... nothing at all...
And who started those fires?
Your simple is that you're pretty sure Gulf War Syndrome is caused by oil well fires? Can you tell me what led you to this conclusion?
Uh since when did I say oil fires have anything to do with Gulf War Sydrome?