Programs, features, games. How about crippled ShadowCopy.
But you didn't say "Shadow copy is broken," you were talking about third party software. Though I'll bite, how exactly is shadow copy broken in Windows 10?
And speaking of the ability to run ancient piece of software is gone too with the removing of Windows XP Virtual Mode.
Windows 10 comes with a slimmed down version of HyperV, a much more robust virtualization solution for all of your old app needs, you can run anything for any other OS, not *just* a watered down compatibility setting specific to Windows XP (that didn't always work and was barely configurable).
If you're running a *lot* of incompatible software, then that's a separate issue that maybe you need to take a different approach to addressing, or simply don't upgrade to Windows 10 yet. Windows 7 and 8.1 are both still supported operating systems, it's up to you to decide what to run that meets your needs, nobody's forcing you to upgrade on day 1.
The people that used Windows Media Center to record protected shows I won't even mention. Now why the hell do I need to use/install 3rd-party software all the time Microsoft decide to remove a useful feature/functionality?
A feature less than 1% of users took advantage of, it was a very niche feature for videophiles and HTPC users. It was a good product, but it makes complete sense they dropped support. That's life.
Microsoft has clearly ignored the needs of the desktop users, how many updates it has taken to make the start button half as usable, and we are still not there, customization wise. Pathetic. If I need "masturbation" with GUI, there is *nix ya know. Both are free*.
What? Microsoft took the outrage with the mess of a desktop experience that was Windows 8 to heart and actually made Windows 10 a desktop-focused experience. They did a pretty good job of it so far, and they keep making it better every update. Your outrage here is something I'm not understanding, unless you're just pining over the old Windows 7 start bar for some reason.
Nobody is denying under-the-hood improvements we have seen since Windows 7.
That's actually *exactly* what the guy I was replying to was doing
It's just these improvements aren't as important to the vast majority of PC desktop users, as the other things Microsoft did change with its OS. DirectX 12 apps are nowhere to be seen yet and likely will take time for this to really take off. Sure, it's great to see Windows becoming more efficient and faster running on the same hardware but these improvements aren't as crucial as they could have been, say in early Vista days, when people had significantly weaker computers, much less ram, slower hard drives than what we have today. Who cares, if it uses ~500mb less memory when newer systems come out with 8-32 gigs of RAM out of the gate.
I agree for home users, but Windows isn't just for home users. Managing system resources is a really, really important thing in the business world, which makes up the bulk of Microsoft's sales. Home users get that stuff as an added perk, so I don't see a negative here. Would a home user upgrade *just for this*? Of course not, but computing needs for home users vs businesses are two entirely different topics. And that's not to say that home users get no benefits, simple things like transferring files over a network were greatly improved since Windows 7.
And using Windows 10 on older systems doesn't make much sense either because, the biggest bottleneck today isn't Windows but 3rd-party programs that can bog down any system with ease. And 3rd party programs like modern web browsers along with the poorly optimized web content do require a fast CPU with plenty of ram, something that the older computers may not have to begin with. The progress has slowed down in all key areas, and Microsoft constantly juggling features around isn't helping at all. They change their "vision" every quarter seems like.
Third party software running like hot tar on ancient hardware is not microsoft's problem or responsibility though, and has little to do with the OS in question. But if anything this situation is where those optimizations you claim home users don't see or care about are the
most important. The OS using 500MB less RAM on a system that only has 3GB is
huge. The smaller resource footprint of Windows 8 over Windows 7 was one of the few things in the "win" column when it was released.
Personally, I don't mind discussing these things. This is a forum after all. Telemetry and privacy is just part of the problem, in my opinion. Windows 10 Home/Pro under-delivered in all areas except speed/efficiency and of course dumbing down. Luckily it isn't any slower than Windows 8.1 at least, yeah there is light at the end of the tunnel.
I don't mind discussing them either, but you have to admit lately there hasn't been a whole lot of discussion in these topics. A good bit of it is people going on rants about how Microsoft hates us for our freedoms or wants to give all our web search history to the NSA and whoever uses it is a blind sheep who should be evicted from the country and wants to take our rights away or god knows what other crazy conspiracy nonsense. Certainly not constructive criticisms or discussion, it's starting to feel like some apocalypse survivalist forum instead of a group of professionals and enthusiasts.