Asking Ryan Smith of AT if a special examination could be done?

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Lepton87

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2009
2,544
9
81
yup, then he sold it to me =) If you guys could get over the disclaimer in his sig you would probably like the guy. Jealousy has that effect on some people I guess.

Keys I'm still waiting on my initiation into the NFG. I think I would be good at facilitating the evaluation of nVidia products. kidding, or am I? :whiste:

To be fair, at 5870 release it was really hard even for NV fanboys to tout GTX285 as the superior card. Of course they still tried, Psyx being their mostly used weapon. 5870 was just in an another league performance-wise. Right now they would say that it stutters and its 70fps is worse than 285's 40 fps in terms of smoothness. Those numbers really are in the ballpark of how much faster 5870 was and still is. Even new games are playable on such an ancient card as 5870 and its tessellation performance was the argument that it won't be viable in a very short time. Right now tessellation in most games incurs a tremendous performance hit for a very slight gain in IQ. I usually leave it turned off because I mostly don't even notice it during game-play.
 

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
I could list all the posts where those accusations were aimed at me personally, and a number that were directed at other AMD users who dared to state they had no problems with stutters with AMD GPUs any more than Nvidia (single GPUs).

My stance has always been that my experience with AMD and Nvidia is identical in smoothness, though the HD 7970 is generally faster. This is based on having used both GTX 680 and HD 7970 in single GPU configurations.

If AMD cards gave the stutters as suggested by the OP then I would most certainly NOT be defending AMD. I would be up in arms demanding they fix the problem. If you read this thread you can see many posts that refute the TR findings and even bring into question the validity of the results. Yet we still have Nvidia users asking "can we have an investigation". Do you really think every single one of the AMD owners in this thread are part of a big conspiracy to hide the fact that their cards stutter and run like crap? We just refuse to accept that our poor eyes are deceiving us according to this guy.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=34341731&postcount=147

FUD.

Why do we go to sites and read review, with actual DATA?

Because...then human eye cannot tell the whole story.

And nothing in my post resembles the lies you posted...find another post to attach your lies too...
 

Mistwalker

Senior member
Feb 9, 2007
343
0
71
Like you said, he's not a moderator anymore so you can put him on ignore. I don't think attacking him does you or your position much good. Does he have an agenda? Yes. Why shouldn't he? Everyone else on here does. Everyone had their favorite company and their own bias. At least he's open and honest about being a paid shill/enthusiast/whatever your own bias says he is.

There has been a long track record of all these video card companies playing games to get a head of each other in the IQ department, the FPS department etc.

If Nvidia is providing a better experience out of the box and AMD is requiring 3rd party tools to correct their out of box experience that is valuable information for the consumer. Not only that but widespread discourse on such issues has in the past propelled these companies to make changes. Maybe due to this kind of investigating AMD starts including RadeonPro in their packaging or even their drivers.

There's nothing wrong with asking Ryan in the public forum to look into this and generating community interest over it. Anandtech isn't going to waste resources, time and money on doing something that only a few people want to see done. They will however look into something if there is a large community desire for it. That's what these threads serve.
Quoting this in its entirety because it's exactly what I was going to post.

People need to stop focusing on the motives behind a request like this one. It doesn't matter if Keys or anyone hopes one architecture or another ends up looking better. The ONLY thing that matters is that such a test be done in an even-handed manner, with objective results. If there's any site I'd request such a test and trust in it being handled well, it would be here.
 

VulgarDisplay

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2009
6,193
2
76
FUD.

Why do we go to sites and read review, with actual DATA?

Because...then human eye cannot tell the whole story.

And nothing in my post resembles the lies you posted...find another post to attach your lies too...

What about when one of the reviews that sparked this whole flame war was based on what 1 reviewer's eyes saw?
 

ICDP

Senior member
Nov 15, 2012
707
0
0
What about when one of the reviews that sparked this whole flame war was based on what 1 reviewer's eyes saw?

It wasn't just his eye at TR, but the data presented did contradict all the other data the same site and dozens of reviews from other sites show.

This of course brings up the core issue, what is the cause of the contradicting data. I feel it is the Windows 8 OS AMD drivers causing the problem. Many (but not all) NV fans want the stutter alegations to be true so they can claim a victory. The AMD fans and those of us who have who claimed there are no discernable differences just keep getting told our opinions are subjective, as if the reviewers opinions are somehow objective.

And it goes round and round
 

BrightCandle

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2007
4,762
0
76
Its not just TR. HardOCP say the same thing without the frame time data and having owned 680s and 7970s I concur with them, the AMD cards stutter.

The industry just needs to work out how to measure it reliably and then it will finally be fixed.
 

Will Robinson

Golden Member
Dec 19, 2009
1,408
0
0
Hmm,there's been a lot of anecdotal evidence regarding GTX670s having poorly made,flimsy PCBs.
I think it would be a good idea for all tech sites on the Net to have a major investigation into that.
After all,if a few users have reported it,that means it's probably true right?
Only a full investigation will do,any NVDA owners who don't think its necessary may have ulterior motives...
 

BrightCandle

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2007
4,762
0
76
Hmm,there's been a lot of anecdotal evidence regarding GTX670s having poorly made,flimsy PCBs.
I think it would be a good idea for all tech sites on the Net to have a major investigation into that.
After all,if a few users have reported it,that means it's probably true right?
Only a full investigation will do,any NVDA owners who don't think its necessary may have ulterior motives...

100% support such an investigation. If NVidia or its partners are producing easier to damage cards when installed then customers should know about it. Its especially important to the water coolers who replace the default cooler with water blocks that potentially put pressure in a slightly different way. I can attest to the fact that the MSI 680 boards does not have weak PCB, they are slightly better than the Sapphire 7970's I had.

Its important to understand there is enough evidence to need these sorts of tests in all reviews. Microstutter has been a big topic on this forum all year.
 

ICDP

Senior member
Nov 15, 2012
707
0
0
Its not just TR. HardOCP say the same thing without the frame time data and having owned 680s and 7970s I concur with them, the AMD cards stutter.

The industry just needs to work out how to measure it reliably and then it will finally be fixed.

I concur, I tried 7970s in CF and there was a lot of microstutter. It was fixable to a large degree but for me it was too much hassle and I opted for single GPU config. I run at 2560x1600 and a single 7970 at 1200/1600 can run even demanding games at very playable FPS.

At 2560x1600 I find my HD 7970 is 15% or faster on average in games at 1200 core than my GTX 680 at 1300 core. That is enough to make the difference between playable and unplayable at that res. Dep[ending on the game sometimes the 680 is = or marginally faster but that is the exception rather than the rule.

Both are great cards, but at 2560x1600 the 7970 starts to show its superiority.
 
Last edited:

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
100% support such an investigation. If NVidia or its partners are producing easier to damage cards when installed then customers should know about it. Its especially important to the water coolers who replace the default cooler with water blocks that potentially put pressure in a slightly different way. I can attest to the fact that the MSI 680 boards does not have weak PCB, they are slightly better than the Sapphire 7970's I had.

Its important to understand there is enough evidence to need these sorts of tests in all reviews. Microstutter has been a big topic on this forum all year.

So would I! :thumbsup:
 

bononos

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2011
3,894
162
106
Which post? None at all. It's perfectly normal to oppose the pursuit of knowledge in any which way you possibly can.
See, you're worse than I am in my assumptions. You dismiss things while I'm open to investigation. Why aren't you? Or am I
mistaken and you are all for it? Clue me in.

Oppose pursuit of knowledge? Hardly. My 1st (or 2nd) post on this thread called for more investigation in what is a better way to measure real world performance, whereas your slant is about an expose of a crooked fps vs frame latency advantage. As I have said reading the articles from [H] / TR / Ryan's post make it quite clear at this point that the stuttering problem
affects both Radeon/Nvidia similarly and is not a bigger issue for one or the other. Single card stuttering was not brought up or very inconclusive. The H or TR article did not mention worse stuttering with 12.11. Your posts however say that AMD has a framerate latency issue in single card and xfire configs which was amplified by the 12.11 drivers.

On top of your far fetched conspiracy claim (and above) in this thread, you recently (1/2 month ago?) made a busy thread arguing that AMD had undercover employees seeding the forums.

......
Notice anything special about the wording? Also, do you see anything that says I represent Nvidia? No, I don't think you can.
......
So, from this point on, anyone going after me personally for being in the Nvidia focus group gets reported. All I'm saying.

You might not represent Nvidia officially but you can certainly be suspected of talking up the company's products. Its highly disingenuous to imply that focus group members are solely disinterested reviewers. Sticking a disclaimer sig should do nothing to persuade others from thinking so, it is a necessary warning.

Its wrong to believe that if 'focus group members'(not just talking about NVG here) are not paid employees (and even if they are not given any freebies) then they can't possibly be accused of extra bias. They may be so emotionally invested as fans of a certain club/brand/political thought/celeb that it becomes obsessive. Additionally some enjoy being regarded as gurus in a certain subject matter, being given mod privileges to oversee and guide discussions etc, running their own websites/forums

A big advantage of having a focus group is the capability of plausible deniability to make make various claims even if they don't pan out for whatever reason. Whether its higher ipc for example or h.264 functionality (didn't pan out for 68xx in the past)... Recently there was one poster (M&S, no sig disclaimer) who claimed he had access to various ssd firmware versions and he experienced 'great improvements' moving up thru the versions as a beta tester.
 

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
Hmm,there's been a lot of anecdotal evidence regarding GTX670s having poorly made,flimsy PCBs.
I think it would be a good idea for all tech sites on the Net to have a major investigation into that.
After all,if a few users have reported it,that means it's probably true right?
Only a full investigation will do,any NVDA owners who don't think its necessary may have ulterior motives...

I suggest you make a thread...if true, I'm all for a investigation?
 

KCfromNC

Senior member
Mar 17, 2007
208
0
76
It wasn't just his eye at TR, but the data presented did contradict all the other data the same site and dozens of reviews from other sites show.

Was it anyone's eyes at all in the TR review? I looked but couldn't find anything which said something like "these measurements backed up our impressions that card X gave choppy performance". I thought they were going by the raw numbers without trying to correlate them to any observed effects on the actual display.
 

Whitestar127

Senior member
Dec 2, 2011
397
24
81
FUD.
Why do we go to sites and read review, with actual DATA?
Because...then human eye cannot tell the whole story.

If he perceives no stutter, then there is no stutter. Simple as that. I have had microstuttering with my 5970 in a game or two that I can remember, but I will believe someone if they say they have no stuttering.

IMO a test like this is only interesting if there are measurable differences that can actually be perceived. That's why I would like a visual blind test as well.
 

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
If he perceives no stutter, then there is no stutter. Simple as that. I have had microstuttering with my 5970 in a game or two that I can remember, but I will believe someone if they say they have no stuttering.

IMO a test like this is only interesting if there are measurable differences that can actually be perceived. That's why I would like a visual blind test as well.

False, it might just be his fysiology, while anotehr person CAN detect tit.

Hence we use numbers...they are objective....unlike people.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Hmm,there's been a lot of anecdotal evidence regarding GTX670s having poorly made,flimsy PCBs.
I think it would be a good idea for all tech sites on the Net to have a major investigation into that.
After all,if a few users have reported it,that means it's probably true right?
Only a full investigation will do,any NVDA owners who don't think its necessary may have ulterior motives...

Would welcome such investigations.
 

ICDP

Senior member
Nov 15, 2012
707
0
0
If he perceives no stutter, then there is no stutter. Simple as that. I have had microstuttering with my 5970 in a game or two that I can remember, but I will believe someone if they say they have no stuttering.

IMO a test like this is only interesting if there are measurable differences that can actually be perceived. That's why I would like a visual blind test as well.

False, it might just be his fysiology, while anotehr person CAN detect tit.

Hence we use numbers...they are objective....unlike people.

Lol, read his post again, it might help if you look up the meaning of the word perceives. If you use an GPU to play a game and see no stutter, does that mean your perception is wrong if someone shows a chart showing differently?

You constantly posting how a chart would be more valid than an individuals perception is getting tiresome. No amount of charts willmake someone who is having stutter free gamins suddenly yell "eureka", my game is running crap.
 
Last edited:

KingFatty

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2010
3,034
1
81
Looks like Brent has a few things to say about Radeon Pro.

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1732720&page=2

Posts 24 & 25.

You also might see a few familiar posters there.

He said the following line, can anyone elaborate:
"I found no way to maintain the full performance of crossfire and at the same time smooth the stuttering out, which SLI does natively."

SLI uses frame metering, right? Isn't frame metering, by definition, reducing performance (e.g., holding back frames) to smooth out stuttering?

I don't understand how SLI could be different? Isn't is a forced compromise, you either get smoothness with a lower average FPS, or you get full blast max FPS with some stutter?
 

KingFatty

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2010
3,034
1
81
If he perceives no stutter, then there is no stutter. Simple as that. I have had microstuttering with my 5970 in a game or two that I can remember, but I will believe someone if they say they have no stuttering.

IMO a test like this is only interesting if there are measurable differences that can actually be perceived. That's why I would like a visual blind test as well.

Agreed - I wonder if you presented a "mystery" computer to an evaluator, and asked if there was microstutter or not, could they identify it in such a blind test?
It may be possible to reliably spot the microstutter, but the surprise plot twist would be to ask the person whether they thought the mystery computer had a GPU from AMD or NVidia.

Why not try that, like coke vs pepsi blind taste test? Would really help with prestige to see the review sites who could reliably identify both the microstutter and the brand of card in a blind test (double-blind preferably).

I'm thinking it's very possible to do this.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |