Running Mobo: 4coredual-vsta with E2180 at 290FSB on 1:1 2T on windows 8 rock stable and fast for such a set up.
Bios 2.39a from pctreiber also
Windows 8 32bit made this system incredibly fast compared to XP and more stable.
Give you some more specs info soon when I get more time.
Enhanced Halt State (C1E) is the standard (optimal) way Dual / Quad cores operate :However, is it recommended to enable both, or is it a case that I should enable one but not the other?
Nice indeed. May I ask your DRAM Frequency / Flexibility Option as set in the BIOS ?I'm using 4 gigs of Kingston HyperX DDR2-6400 (800), CL4. I use 3-3-3-9 and 1t timings.
Enhanced Halt State (C1E) is the standard (optimal) way Dual / Quad cores operate :
Oscillating between x6 and your default or set CPU ratio, depending on the CPU load.
SpeedStep has more to do with energy savings IMHO (adequate for laptops and such).
Don't quote me on that, but I think some desktop computers made by Dell (and possibly other manufacturers) use SpeedStep as default, having in mind C1E cannot be switched manually. Meaning, if you have both at your disposal, you should be fine with C1E (and Thermal Throttling if you're interested in this obscure "overheating security feature").
Nice indeed. May I ask your DRAM Frequency / Flexibility Option as set in the BIOS ?
Not directly, but the registered version of AIDA64 (the follow-up to Everest) will provide you plenty of readings in terms of hardware detection.Is there a tool where I can dump my bios settings into a text file?
Then keep it that way. Some measurements show a very marginal speed increase with Microsoft's 64-bit OSes, except for programs specifically made for 64-bit computing (i.e. technical or scientific). In fact, most processes and common programs run perfectly fine in 32-bit, which means the WOW64 subsystem routines may even slightly degrade overall performance.I'm real pleased with my setup.
It's a limitation inherent to the 32-bit architecture, not an issue....4GB issue, although I appreciate that the Via chipset on these boards is limited to just 4GB ram.
Like what ? Benchmarking ?started to do a little test
By shortening the 2 pins on CLRCMOS1 for a few seconds you mean ?cleared CMOS of course, so stock settings
Thnx Bond,
And of course i did this. Also did i try 3 different power supplies. It didn't change a thing. Also 3 different agp cards. All of which I know from that they are working.
I did all that Hlafordleas said of course. Also letting it sit without abtterya dn power overnight+reset cmos. However, so far nothing.
But the strangest thing happened 1 hour ago:
I tried with different memory modules on different slots in different settings: ddr or ddr2, single or duos.
I ve the mobo on a wooden board, to eliminate every possible short.
Now I took 1 ddr stick on slot one. I booted, while keeping pressure on the board to counteract for a little natural bent-ness (nice word huh ) of the board, trying to let it be as flat/straight as visually possible. To test for cracks in the circuit.
I told about the clicks on the speaker: That happened again, but then 5 seconds later, it started to beep. At least 3 long beeps, I think it kept beeping. And they were definitely LONG BEEPS.
I manageed to reproduce that one more boot with both DDR sticks in.
Long beeps, but it didn't show anything, after that I wasn't able to reproduce this again, also not with DDR2.
Now the really weird thing. I of course immediately searched for the beep code for the Ami bios. And guess what, there is no 3 long beeps (or more) - code.
And yes before you guys ask I've got enough experience with building pc's over the years to recognise a long beep or a short.
Ideas?
@Micun,
Obviously those of us still in the thread love these boards, with -SATA 2.0 being the best, among other reasons because it can take better processors.
But these boards are now long in the tooth and, especially, not all that much different from your 775i65G board (I have one, where my E4500 now resides). The use of SATA over IDE drives, access to PCIe cards (that are PCIe 1.1 compatible), and the poss. of using 4GB mem (less once in Windows) are all the upgrade you'd get.
I'd say go with a used or cheap board that can handle Ivy Bridge gen chips. But if you do buy, yes, you can get fairly decent performance out of the 4x slot. The better the card, tho, the more the hit.
Are you saying it is not worth it? e7500 over e4600 overclocked. Is Sapphire HD 4830 will work full with this board or not?
I am only saying that you can find a more powerful motherboard and cpu combination at a very similar price that is more future-proof. Still, the total amount you quoted is low, so no real big loss, and as you see on this site, there is still a good source for info if and when you buy.
Your choice. Check ASRock for officially supported cpus on the -SATA 2.0, plus the latest pc-treiber bios to see if any other proc support was added. You can definitely go for the 8xxx series Core2s.
Yes, sounds like a loose soldering prob. This might be able to be fixed by sticking the board in the oven. Here's the first thing I found googling; you are sure to find more. The method can and does work.
Not too sure either, but it might be that your BIOS itself went berserk after the CPU upgrade.Or any other suggestions. Who knows what 3 or more long beeps mean on an AMI bios?
The 2+1gb implies you won't benefit from Dual Channel, since it requires 2 identical modules.Intel Core2Duo E7500 2,93GHz
3gb DDR2 667 RAM CL5
Expect a performance hit of about 5% . As Hlafordlaes said, the bigger the card, the more it will disappoint, at least during benchmarks. The HD 4830 is among the most powerful it can deal with.will this card work slower on this motherboard 4x pcie?
Are you saying it is not worth it? e7500 over e4600 overclocked. Is Sapphire HD 4830 will work full with this board or not?