***** Asus RealBench 2.41 *****

[spinejam]

Available here: http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/asus_realbench.html



My sig rig @stock: (DDR3 @1600Mhz)

Tue Nov 3 2015
19:18:53


Image Editing: 68862
Time: 124.597

Encoding: 91434
Time: 131.11

OpenCL: 119718
KSamples/sec: 3211

Heavy Multitasking: 91519
Time: 106.863


System Score: 68939



----------------------------

 

[DrMrLordX]

So are you trying to start a benchmark thread here, or are you just showing off your score?

 

[spinejam]

lmao

...just thought I'd start a new bench thread since I recently tried this software. Btw, I'm a very modest person - no need to stroke me.

 

[Deders]

Sig rig @4.6GHz.

 

[gammaray]

I just tried it
rig @stock: (DDR3 @1866Mhz) gtx770

Thu Nov 5 2015 02:45:26

Image Editing: 114113
Time: 75.188

Encoding: 86240
Time: 139.007

OpenCL: 44255
KSamples/sec: 922

Heavy Multitasking: 81862
Time: 119.469

System Score: 72766
----------------------------
Thu Nov 12 2015 16:13:22 gtx970

Image Editing: 112617
Time: 76.187

Encoding: 86190
Time: 139.087

OpenCL: 80346
KSamples/sec: 1997

Heavy Multitasking: 81564
Time: 119.905

System Score: 74110
----------------------------

core-i7 4770k, gtx770, 16ram1866, msigd65 mobo.

 

[Bushwicktrini]

Rig listed below

 

[spinejam]

Nice score Bush- ...took Eli in one of my Fantasy pools this week w/ ODBjr. --- hopefully they can light-up Jacksonville like last week!

I'll rerun this benchmark tonight w/ my overclocked settings and see where she goes!

 

[Bushwicktrini]

Nice score Bush- ...took Eli in one of my Fantasy pools this week w/ ODBjr. --- hopefully they can light-up Jacksonville like last week!

I'll rerun this benchmark tonight w/ my overclocked settings and see where she goes!

TY and history says no Eli will be normal no more 6 td games

 

[spinejam]

Sig Rig (overclocked)

Thu Nov 5 2015
22:04:08


Image Editing: 89946
Time: 95.39

Encoding: 120592
Time: 99.409

OpenCL: 126280
KSamples/sec: 3352

Heavy Multitasking: 119160
Time: 82.074


System Score: 88738



----------------------------

 

[Charlie98]

From my Sandy desktop (DESK in sig below, no GPU.)

Image Editing 103515 Time:82.886

Encoding 58792 Time:203.904

OpenCL 18007 KSamples/sec: 143

Heavy Multitasking 50845 Time:192.348

System Score
54188

 

[lyssword]

xeon v3 1275(L) @3.9

 

[Rickyyy369]

AMD 8350 - 1866 RAM

Stock

4.7Ghz

 

[VirtualLarry]

Intel Core2Quad Q9300 (stock) 2.5Ghz / 333 FSB
8GB DDR2 (4x2GB) 400Mhz 5-5-5-15-2T
XFX Radeon R7 250X 2GB DDR3
Silicon Power 240GB S60 SATA6G SSD

Image Editing
49045
Time: 174.939

Encoding
30060
Time: 398.799

OpenCL
24569
KSamples/sec: 357

Heavy Multitasking
25417
Time: 384.772

System Score
27358


=======
Edit: To add, my Skylake G4400 rig, stock 3.3Ghz, dual-core SKL, Kingston 4GB DDR4-2133 CAS 15, no GPU
=======

Image Editing
92889
Time: 92.368

Encoding
28312
Time: 423.416

OpenCL
18007
KSamples/sec: 156

Heavy Multitasking
23028
Time: 424.691

System Score
36957
=======
IMPORTANT: SKL G4400 results are running SINGLE-CHANNEL DDR4-2133.
=======

I'm a little surprised that the Q9300 came out ahead in anything, actually. This SKL G4400 rig is VERY "peppy". But it looks like a true quad-core can still win out, over a dual-core, in some things.

Edit: I will also note, that at the beginning of the "Heavy Multitasking" test, where they play a video in the background - the first few seconds of that looked really weird and macro-block-y. I put that down the SKL video drivers being still fairly new, although it could indicate an issue with the RAM or SSD in my rig, I suppose.

There were also some pauses, stalls, really, in the video during the heavy multitasking test, that I don't really remember when I benched them with my quad-core. Perhaps those are why the score was lower than the Q9300.

Edit: To add, my SKL G4400 results are with a SINGLE 4GB DDR4-2133 RAM stick, so it's running in single-channel mode. Will re-bench in my new mobos when they arrive, with dual-channel.

 

[DrMrLordX]

Here is a direct link to Asus RealBench 2.41:

http://rog.asus.com/file/?download=RealBench_v2.41.zip

And my RealBench run:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/bkj56rkj0gjfuzj/RealBench-20151107025626.png?dl=0

Image Editing
74578
Time: 115.047

Encoding
52085
Time: 230.158

OpenCL
24569
KSamples/sec: 354

Heavy Multitasking
45565
Time: 214.635

System Score
44285

 

[trungma]

Image Editing
124792
Time:68.754


Encoding
144193
Time:83.138


OpenCL
122999
KSamples/sec: 3322


Heavy Multitasking
138829
Time:70.446


System Score
108103

 

[Rickyyy369]

Image Editing
74578
Time: 115.047

Encoding
52085
Time: 230.158

Heavy Multitasking
45565
Time: 214.635

System Score
44285

I was interested to see the clock for clock improvement that Steamroller has over Piledriver, so I disabled 2 modules on my 8350 and ran the test again:

9.4% improvement in Image Editing.
8.8% improvement in encoding.
8% improvement in Heavy Multitasking.

Not bad. I'm sure we'd see similar improvements going from Steamroller > Excavator. Kind of makes me wish they'd release a 6-8 core Excavator chip as a stopgap until Zen hits, but I know that wont happen :thumbsdown:.

 

[DrMrLordX]

4m/8t xv with HDL libraries ala Carrizo @ 2.5 GHz would have been an interesting competitor to Broadwell-D. There was a lot of talk about how 3-4m configurations would not have worked out well at all for SR thanks to limitations of the 28nm SHP process, and I won't gainsay that assertion (though the latest Kaveri stepping seems to suggest that problem has recently abated). But Carrizo has some bomb-ass IPC vs. Kaveri, and it would have been cheaper/easier for AMD to roll out some low clockspeed server CPUs thanks to HDL. Er, I think anyway.

Zen has sort-of obviated the need for such a product. AMD either lacked the vision and/or the resources to produce 4m XV products as stop-gaps.

Another reason why I think AMD veered away from 4m chips using newer Construction cores is that they couldn't figure out how to solve the slow L3 cache issue of BD/PD. Or they couldn't figure out a good way to cope with the problem. A single-socket 4m chip without l3 probably could have worked out okay, and the die size would have been small compared to something like Vishera with its huge and slow L3, but for multi-socket configurations, AMD really would have needed that L3 for coherency and uh stuff. So L3-less 4m xv would have been a non-starter on mp configs.

 

[VirtualLarry]

SKL G4400 stock, no GPU, results in post #13.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37817523&postcount=13

 

[fourdegrees11]

Pretty interesting benchmark program! Sig rig


Sat Dec 19 2015
23:15:47


Image Editing: 128877
Time: 66.575

Encoding: 84914
Time: 141.177

OpenCL: 73784
KSamples/sec: 1836

Heavy Multitasking: 73285
Time: 133.45


System Score: 75458

 

[CuriousMike]

i5 4590

 

[Edgemeal]

i7-3770 @ 4012 MHz w/Radeon 6670 1GB-DDR3 @ stock

Sun Dec 20 2015
19:48:19

Image Editing: 108437
Time: 79.124

Encoding: 78278
Time: 153.145

OpenCL: 27850
KSamples/sec: 445

Heavy Multitasking: 79622
Time: 122.829

System Score: 67976
----------------------------

 

[Borealis7]

is it worth anything as a stability tester?

 

[Deders]

is it worth anything as a stability tester?

Yeah I use it as a quick guage, go for 15 mins stable, then see if it will do 8 hours, then finalise the voltages with Prime95/Linpack.

I find it gets me closer to completely stable quicker than things like Intel extreme tuning or anything else. The x264 encoding provides more of a load.

 

[Edgemeal]

Quick compare of some system scores,...
updated in post #26

 

[DrMrLordX]

Just so ya know, the "R7 ?" is the Spectre iGPU for the 7700k