AT-AT for America

[Krazy4Real]

this thread is lulz

 

[Fritzo]

No I mean I have read advertisments in the back of Mad magazine with more substance than the abortion bukkake known as Star Wars.

So you're saying you're a woman then...

 

[mmntech]

It is definitively a-t-a-t


Anyone who calls it anything else is fucking wrong for fucking ever

They never call them by name in the movies, but it's definitely A-T-A-T in the games.

No I mean I have read advertisments in the back of Mad magazine with more substance than the abortion bukkake known as Star Wars.

 

[BladeVenom]

I like the AT-ST better, gets better gas mileage. But in the United States I realize the AT-AT will be more popular.

A four legged vehicle is less likely to fall down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww I think we could actually build a working AT-AT.

I don't think we could make a reliable AT-ST. Look how slow even that little ASIMO had to walk.

 

[MoMeanMugs]

Have you ever built a "Death Star"? Maybe they needed the cold vacuum of space to cool the internal awesomeness.

Does not compute. What medium are they using for heat transfer?

 

[DrPizza]

They never call them by name in the movies, but it's definitely A-T-A-T in the games.

They DO call them by name in the movie: Imperial Walkers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWjj8EKTkWE&t=0m30s

 

[PingSpike]

A four legged vehicle is less likely to fall down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww I think we could actually build a working AT-AT.

I don't think we could make a reliable AT-ST. Look how slow even that little ASIMO had to walk.

Also, while there is little data on the AT-AT, we do know that the AT-ST is highly susceptible to Ewok attacks.

 

[sdifox]

Also, while there is little data on the AT-AT, we do know that the AT-ST is highly susceptible to Ewok attacks.

little data? did you not watch assault on Hoth?

 

[Howard]

Kinda like a really big Big Dog, eh?

 

[ussfletcher]

Also, while there is little data on the AT-AT, we do know that the AT-ST is highly susceptible to Ewok attacks.

We know it is highly susceptible to dental floss.

 

[rudeguy]

That girl is annoying. Worse than Olivia Munn.

Wait. Do people really call AT-AT as "at at"? I always just call it A-T-A-T.
So what do people call AT-ST? "at sat"? "at sit"?

this is better
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgAJTeD1vmI

 

[Newbian]

little data? did you not watch assault on Hoth?

I don't remember seeing a lot of ewoks on hoth.

 

[DaTT]

A four legged vehicle is less likely to fall down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww I think we could actually build a working AT-AT.

I don't think we could make a reliable AT-ST. Look how slow even that little ASIMO had to walk.

That thing creeps me out like big time!

 

[Crono]

The AT-AT was garbage. Like everything the Empire did, it was big, expensive, and easily taken down by a design flaw the engineers didn't account for.

I would like to see a Mech from the BattleTech/MechWarrior series, though. Maybe a Mad Cat Mark II. It's definitely possible to create a full scale, fully working one with today's technology, though it would take money.

 

[sdifox]

I don't remember seeing a lot of ewoks on hoth.

he was talking about AT AT...

 

[Ichinisan]

They never call them by name in the movies, but it's definitely A-T-A-T in the games.

I'm pretty sure I was playing a Rogue Squadron game when I first heard "at at". I think it was Mark Hamill's voice too.

 

[DrPizza]

I was watching that scene earlier today when they attacked on Hoth and I thought to myself, the Rebels are a bunch of idiots! Why are they approaching from the front for their attacks. The AT-ATs can't shoot behind them. Completely vulnerable from behind.

 

[SphinxnihpS]

I was watching that scene earlier today when they attacked on Hoth and I thought to myself, the Rebels are a bunch of idiots! Why are they approaching from the front for their attacks. The AT-ATs can't shoot behind them. Completely vulnerable from behind.

The movie makers were a bunch of idiots?

 

[Blitzvogel]

To hell with an AT-AT. We need a *cue gruff voice*......Metal Gear.

 

[Newbian]

The AT-AT was garbage. Like everything the Empire did, it was big, expensive, and easily taken down by a design flaw the engineers didn't account for.

I would like to see a Mech from the BattleTech/MechWarrior series, though. Maybe a Mad Cat Mark II. It's definitely possible to create a full scale, fully working one with today's technology, though it would take money.

Don't those things overheat at a drop of a hat?

Remember some of the cartoons and such and they always did that.

 

[guyver01]

I would like to see a Mech from the BattleTech/MechWarrior series, though. Maybe a Mad Cat Mark II. .

some dude did it as a tree house

 

[Newbian]

he was talking about AT AT...

He was commenting about little data about attacks on a AT-AT by ewoks like they did to the AT-ST and you commented about hoth so where were the ewoks in hoth?

 

[guyver01]

Japan already has a Gundam

 

[sdifox]

I was watching that scene earlier today when they attacked on Hoth and I thought to myself, the Rebels are a bunch of idiots! Why are they approaching from the front for their attacks. The AT-ATs can't shoot behind them. Completely vulnerable from behind.

Rebels were defending, not attacking :awe:

And none of their weapon was powerful enough to overcome the shields on the AT AT. Out comes the dental floss.

 

[sdifox]

He was commenting about little data about attacks on a AT-AT by ewoks like they did to the AT-ST and you commented about hoth so where were the ewoks in hoth?

he was commenting on how little combat data there was on AT AT as opposed to AT ST which were owned by ewoks.

Also, while there is little data on the AT-AT, we do know that the AT-ST is highly susceptible to Ewok attacks.