MyThirdEye
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2005
- 3,614
- 0
- 76
Everyone who says they're smart enough but just "don't work hard enough" -- isn't that lack of drive a synonym for lack of intelligence? If you were smart enough, you'd have the mental fortitude and discipline to force yourself to just get through it, because it's worth it in the end. Instead, you've made the decision (the wrong one, by your own admission) to forgo the difficult, boring work in lieu of more immediate gratification.
I suppose this is where you get to that ambiguous line between "intelligence" and "personality" -- which one is most influential when making a choice?
Nope. Intelligence is raw ability. Has NOTHING to do with personality, motivation, wisdom, morality, beliefs...hell, not even knowledge really. Intelligence is ONLY intelligence.
I've never felt like I wasn't smart enough. I've often felt like I didn't work hard enough. Probably too smart for my own good.
Using laziness as an excuse is just pathetic. I'm guilty of doing that myself, but I've come to realize that I just have to do it, so I am. It's pretty much worthless to say you "could" do something but don't cause you're lazy or whatever.
Bertrand Russel said:In the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.
Early on, during undergrad when I couldn't just skate by with good grades and I was too lazy to actually apply myself for the good grades.
I remember one day in one of my poly sci classes, this was during the Clinton scandal, I went to class and the professor was leading the class on a discussion about Pres. Clinton and the accusations, etc. I remember being woefully unprepared I was for the discussion as some in the class were really on top of what was going on, knew all different issues and perspectives i never thought of and knew so much of what talking heads were talking about, long before our current 24/hour news cycle and endless parades of blogs...
Now that I'm an attorney, I'm realizing that more is about being prepared, experience and being able to resolve complex ideas/issues on the fly. I do labor arbitrations against named partners from large law firms, and I find that for the most part i can keep up and do well against the big names because they are relying on their experience and I can counter with preparation. Though...I am still taught a thing or two by the guys with their names on their building's...that's probably the best thing to learn...
Jeez... I don't really know. I guess it depends on what you mean. What am I not smart enough for? A PhD from MIT in Physics/Mathematics/EE? World mathematics olympics? Idk. I didn't come from the right background for that shit to ever really be a possibility.
I'm pretty sure if I applied myself I could probably do most things. I just don't apply myself.
Just because you don't attend Harvard doesn't mean you are going to do poorly.