irishScott
Lifer
- Oct 10, 2006
- 21,568
- 3
- 0
The best part about all of this is that steel core ammo offers no advantage to sportsmen over lead core ammo, making the whole flap just a demonstration of gun freak paranoia.
On top of that, steel core 5.56 ammo hasn't been banned at all.
Yeh, yeh, I know- "But they wanna do it!"
So what if they did? Enthusiasts would still be able to buy all the lead core 5.56 ammo that their hearts desire.
Must be one of those "Freedumb!" things.
Aside from the fact that said ammo is extremely common, cheap, in wide use for decades and that there's zero evidence that categorizing it as "armor piercing" will have any effect on crime?
Hell, the freaking Fraternal Order of Police has said the round is not killing cops.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...ded-ar-15-round-isnt-a-threat/article/2560964
As someone who's read the ATF's proposed changes word-for-word, The "saving police officers' lives" angle is virtually their entire argument. It doesn't hold water in and of itself, as any bullet, including the soft-core variety, fired out of a rifle or AR/AK pistol will penetrate soft body armor; but when the freaking police come out and say there isn't a problem, you know they're full of shit.
The only logical assumption is some mild backdoor gun control, or the ATF not knowing what they're proposing (and even they aren't that stupid).
And frankly, accusing gun owners of "paranoia" is a broken record at this point. Every time gun control comes around, even obvious, in-your-face gun control that's called such by its authors, gun owners are told that we're "paranoid" for opposing it and "nothing important will happen". Yeah, at this point you can shove that back up your ass where it came from. Gun owners put the nation to shame when it comes to holding our representatives accountable for what they were elected to do.