Question about the AMD T-Birds...I'm sure this has been asked, but bear with me...I've been an Intel-er all my life...
This question came into my mind I was trying to engineer a post on the cheapest dual athlon arrangement while browsing around on PriceWatch, and then it struck me...
TBird 1.4s come in two flavors: The 266FSB versions and 200FSB versions.
Now, the 200FSB versions cost significantly MORE than the 266FSB versions, presumably to 'deter' o/c-ers. However, the problem lies therein. Since T-Birds are NOT mult-locked, what difference does it make? 200FSB 1.4s are just 7x200, while 266FSB 1.4s are ?x266 (Arg...doesn't come out rite on the calculator...) But I could buy a 266FSB and pump the mult all the way up to 7, and attain a clock similar to that of a 200FSB 1.4 running at 266.
AMD lists them as the same price (130) yet on Pricewatch there's this $13 USD difference...
Help.
This question came into my mind I was trying to engineer a post on the cheapest dual athlon arrangement while browsing around on PriceWatch, and then it struck me...
TBird 1.4s come in two flavors: The 266FSB versions and 200FSB versions.
Now, the 200FSB versions cost significantly MORE than the 266FSB versions, presumably to 'deter' o/c-ers. However, the problem lies therein. Since T-Birds are NOT mult-locked, what difference does it make? 200FSB 1.4s are just 7x200, while 266FSB 1.4s are ?x266 (Arg...doesn't come out rite on the calculator...) But I could buy a 266FSB and pump the mult all the way up to 7, and attain a clock similar to that of a 200FSB 1.4 running at 266.
AMD lists them as the same price (130) yet on Pricewatch there's this $13 USD difference...
Help.