I still think it's a bad buy and poor value for budget web/email PC builds. With how bloated things in the browser keep getting each day and how every service wants its own software running to deliver stuff to your PC the real FASTER cores are appreciated. The extra GPU just increases longevity and flexibility.
Like I said this isn't 2017. When you were getting a $60 G4560 to upgrade to the next tier (4c/4t and UHD 630) you needed to triple the CPU cost to get up to i5-7400. I can see the dollar justification for the G4560. The difference between $55 200GE and $99 2200G? Not so much.
I disagree that the extra iGPU performance does't help things; modern web browsers, including the newest nightly version of Firefox, are now using video-game-like GPU rendering techniques, to reach 60FPS rendering. The usage of a GPU, for web browsing, is here to stay. (Haven't even touched on VR, AR, and the 3D Web.)
And you stress "Faster" cores. Do you think that a 3.2Ghz Zen core with SMT is somehow slow? It's not! "This is not your father's Bulldozer / Piledriver core." (A 4C/4T Zen, at a lower clock speed, can match an 8-core FX running at 4Ghz, in MT performance.)
And the 2200G, is only officially a 3.5Ghz CPU, although I believe it can turbo a single core to 3.9Ghz at times. The biggest performance benefit from a 2200G 4C/4T, is putting it on a B350/B450 board or better, and manually OCing it to 3.80Ghz or 3.90Ghz all-core, all the time.
Heck, as far as snappiness goes, a 2.7Ghz Skylake dual-core, is noticeably snappier than a six-core FX-6300, to my perception, even with similar SSDs, and less RAM. A Ryzen still beats it though.
So, if you intend to game at all on your PC, yes, I would suggest skipping the 200GE, and moving up to a 2200G. Also, if you want to overclock, on a B350 or better AM4 board, yes, move up to a 2200G or better.
But for Mom'n'Pop PCs, I really think that a 200GE, is likely all that they would need. And still better than a low-end Intel CPU, thus far. HD630 is still only so good, and 2CU Vega seems to meet or exceed that capability.
I'm eager to see if a 220GE Athlon APU, has a 6CU Vega, and/or is 4C/4T, because that would IMHO really shake things up good for AMD against Intel's low-end. It would be decisively better than their lower-end CPUs, instead of just slightly. Assuming that the price was under $70.
Edit: Zen core, 4C/4T, 4-6CU Vega, and a 3.3Ghz or better clock-speed, even locked, would likely wipe the floor with Intel's 2C/4T Pentium chips, especially with a 6CU Vega, if AMD matches or beats Intel's price on those range of CPUs.