Originally posted by: stevejst
hahaha i'm gonna start laughing if people start arguing in this thread over a "socket" or better yet "defective cache" in cpu's that aren't even out yet
I said twice in this thread that none of us/you knows what exactly Athlon FX is. Yet the AMD fanboys keep on claiming they know. Therefore my post is just to ask HOW MUCH SENSE YOU GUYS MAKE!
But I am not saying it isn't possible. With AMD everything is possible. It is possible to have three+ years talk about the processor without having one, about posting fantasy benchmarks that nobody can replicate etc.
Look at the prices of Opteron. AMD fanboys cannot afford that. All of your sigs are about Barton/T'bred, nobody tried Opteron, howz that?
There is a 242 refurbished Opteron for $350 at newegg ($100 discount) that I see there for three days already and none of the AMD fanatics seems to be ready to buy that. Barton's Celeron does make sense in that regard though I see absolutely no reason for anybody to buy such a junk if that is what you expect will happen. Not me.
the opteron is a server chip that is why it is so much more expensive than the athlon64 will be or the new athlonFX if it comes out
this is great
(why stop supporting socket 462)
makes sense to me
wait till late september then we'll all know what's really going on tho
also a few board/chipset/core mods down the line people like me with a good athlon system might adopt one
next year prices should be good
a cut down version of the barton for 462 sockets would be nice
cause the hammer has an integrated memory controller so you would think they would need a different socket like the 940 as they already are
so if it used socket 462 that would be great to position a whole platform against the celeron and be very competitive
not to mention the posibility of .09 making it cheaper and adding the posibility for 512kb and sse2 even if the first one don't