ATI 4xxx Series Thread

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

AshPhoenix

Member
Mar 12, 2008
187
0
0
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.
 

JPB

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2005
4,064
89
91
Originally posted by: AshPhoenix
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.

So given that if true...the RV770 Pro *4850* will be as fast as a 9800GTX ?

And if the RV770XT *4870X2* would be faster than 9800GTX SLI ?

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
 

Janooo

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2005
1,067
13
81
Originally posted by: JPB
[...

RV770XT to etail for $229

Another great price


<ATI's Radeon RV770XT based cards powered with GDDR5 memory will end up with a $229 suggested etail price and it?s likely to drop quickly to under $200 mark. This is the price for 512MB card that should be the top of the mainstream / performance line of ATI RV770 generation.

Naturally, the RV770PRO card with 512MB of GDDR3 memory will end up cheaper and it will launch at under $200 suggested etail price.

RV770XT will replace Radeon 3870 512MB cards on the market while RV770PRO should replace 3850 cards of live on top of them.

We believe that ATI won?t kill its affordable Radeon 3870 and 3850 cards and will make them co-exist with RV770 based products, at least for the time being.

I know its Faud. But if true......:Q
I'd say $349 is more accurate. The chances are close to zero that a GDDR5 card will go for $229.
 

JPB

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2005
4,064
89
91
Well, you never know. That Chinese website said they had confirmation that the X2 variant would be around $479 at launch. Which would make the 4870 right around the $229 point.
 

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
145
106
www.neftastic.com
Originally posted by: nRollo
If it's true it's bad news for AMD.

AMD is not in a position to give away cards right now, and if the price is that low, the performance of these cards will reflect that as well.

They would price them higher if they could, and that is likely bad news for all who like the idea of two GPU manufacturers to choose from.

If these things offer 9800GTX level performance for $30 less, the floodgates of sales aren't going to open for AMD with people thinking "Finally. I have been waiting to get 9800GTX performance for $30 less!".

Oh no. If that is what's coming in June, they'll sell cards here and there to their fans, and that's about it. The more we see of the upcoming product launches, the more I'm reminded of "The more things change, the more they stay the same".

Hardly. If they're pricing them in line, then I would handily applaud AMD for taking the step to bring quality performance at a REASONABLE price point. Seeing as NVIDIA consistently puts out high end cards with margins in excess of 100%... I would love to see a competing product priced at a more reasonable margin.
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
18,407
4,968
136
http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tm...nt-view-37453-135.html

ATI Radeon 4800 launch details: Meet (Terry) Makedon and Trojan (Horse) PDF Print E-mail
Hardware
By Theo Valich
Wednesday, May 14, 2008 17:48
TG Daily Exclusive ? We previously published several details about AMD?s next-generation graphics card lineup and as we get closer to the launch we are getting more details about the launch date, feature set and prices. The good news: The new boards will come with ?physics processing capability? and prices that will start below $200 for a 512 MB board. The bad news: The 4800 series will launch after Nvidia?s GT200.

Yes, we know, we previously said that the 4800 series would launch in May, but as it stands right now, we won?t be seeing the first new cards until mid-June. According To AMD?s current introduction schedule, the Radeon 4800 series will launch in week 25, which puts the day of the introduction somewhere between June 15 and June 22. What is significant about this time frame is that ATI will trail Nvidia and their new high-end chip GT200.

This comes as a major surprise, because it was widely expected that ATI will debut its RV770 chip first, followed by Nvidia's summer part. But as it stands right now, Nvidia has the pole position in a new round of the graphics wars. Of course, the GT200 and RV770 are actually not entirely comparable, because of their huge price difference. But performance-wise, we're in for a possibly close race.

ATI's Radeon 4800 series will be introduced in three flavors - as 4850, 4870 and 4870 X2. The company will also offer a ?4850 256MB? (as opposed to 512 MB in other versions), but this SKU is a so-called "option" and is geared towards to the OEM/ODM/SI crowd to support them with cheaper parts for the back-to-school period and beyond.

The Radeon 4850, code-named ?Makedon,? is AMD's launch board. The name, by the way, is likely to refer to Terry "Catalyst" Makedon, group manager for software and video in the AMD (ATI) graphics division. Of course, there is a small chance that Alexander The Great (Alexandros Megas, Alexandar Makedonski) may have influenced the naming, but somehow we feel that Terry has won this time.

The 4850 board features 512 MB of GDDR3 memory and is expected to be available in volume at launch. We heard that card vendors will start printing their boxes next week, which means that the specifications are final at this time. According to our sources, the 4850 will come with single-slot cooling; CrossFireX is supported with up to four boards in a single system (if you have the appropriate board based on AMD 790FX, 790GX, Intel Skulltrail, X48) and each board will require a single 6-pin PCIe power connector.

AMD will follow up in July and launch the Radeon 4870 512 MB GDDR5 and the 4870 X2 1024 MB GDDR5 (R700). The Radeon 4870 chip is built onto a board codenamed ?Trojan? (could be named after a condom brand or a horse; we pick the latter) and comes with a dual-slot cooler, following the tradition of earlier XX70 boards. Our previous information about the memory buffer was a bit inaccurate, since the cost of Qimonda's GDDR5 memory apparently was not compatible with the targeted pricing of these cards. The 4870 includes 512MB GDDR5 memory and surpasses upcoming Nvidia cards in terms of bandwidth. However, if any ATI partner wants to build a 1024 MB GDDR5 board, ATI will not say no, we were told. But don't expect this to happen until early fall, since everybody wants to move as many units as possible.

In terms of performance, we heard some interesting claims. A 4870 should perform on par with or better than a dual-chip 3870 X2. Our sources explained to us that using a PCIe Gen1 controller 3870 X2 was a mistake, since the board was hungry for data and didn't sync well with this interface. Don?t expect the ATI team to repeat that mistake with the 4870 X2. However, we admit that we have no idea what kind of connection two RV770 GPUs will have.

Looking at features, ATI will promote DirectX 10.1, PCI Express 2.0, dynamic geometry acceleration and other functions that were introduced with the Radeon 3800 series. What surprises us is that the manufacturer is highlighting a "Game physics processing capability" in its launch materials. Since ATI didn't bid for Havok (which ended up in Intel?s lap) and Nvidia snapped up PhysX we wonder who provides a physics engine for ATI. Perhaps the company took a completely different direction and it simply expanded its GPGPU capabilities from professional FireStream cards to the desktop.

The Radeon 4800 series also includes 7.1 channel-via-HDMI support and color output also got a ?significant? boost, our sources said. We were unable to confirm HDMI 1.3 support, but we would not be surprised if that in fact is the case. The Unified Video Decoder is now in generation 2 and is called "UVD2".

Every aspect of the GPU is monitored by PowerPlay, since ATI will be very aggressive on the power side: The boards have been designed with power in mind and the 4850/4870 won't require 8+6-pin combinations (exception: The dual-GPU 4870 X2). Power supply requirements call for a 450 watt unit for a single card and a 550 watt version for two cards. Given the fact that ATI has to state this for PoS power supplies, CrossFire should do just fine with a top notch 400 watt power supply.

Let?s talk about pricing. AMD decided to remain aggressive in an effort to win back market share. Pricing is actually set to a point where Nvidia is unlikely to be able to compete (that is at least what somebody is hoping for). Pricing guidelines are not finalized at this time, but according to several sources, the Radeon 4850 will succeed the 3850 512MB and should cost about $189-$219 at launch. Our sources indicated that 4870 GDDR5 cards will cost between $249 and $279, but somehow we feel that AMD might aim go for $199 and $249 at launch.

Given the current market, these prices could stir up the market and create quite a circus. Radeon cards could be getting lots of design wins for the back-to-school market, but our sources warned us that ATI is a bit late to the party. Qualifying of systems takes time, and tens of thousands of machines take time to be manufactured and shipped to North America. For Europe, things are more lenient, since nobody works in August and schools/universities start in September or October.

All in all, ATI will have one helluwa June and July. All eyes are now on Nvidia: Will Nvidia create a decent competitor for the sub-$300 range (55nm G92 is being prepared), or will AMD/ATI will gain market share?
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: JPB
Originally posted by: AshPhoenix
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.

So given that if true...the RV770 Pro *4850* will be as fast as a 9800GTX ?

And if the RV770XT *4870X2* would be faster than 9800GTX SLI ?

:thumbsup::thumbsup:

I'll take a statement from ANYBODY over something that fuad wrote... The specs on 4850 seem a little strong to me, but the 4870 numbers are right in line with it being a little bit faster than an ultra. This could also explain why nvidia is rushing their launch, they want to steal amd's thunder (just like last time).
 

JACKDRUID

Senior member
Nov 28, 2007
729
0
0
Originally posted by: JPB

<ATI's Radeon RV770XT based cards powered with GDDR5 memory will end up with a $229 suggested etail price and it?s likely to drop quickly to under $200 mark. This is the price for 512MB card that should be the top of the mainstream / performance line of ATI RV770 generation.

Naturally, the RV770PRO card with 512MB of GDDR3 memory will end up cheaper and it will launch at under $200 suggested etail price.

RV770XT, if its 1.3times faster than 9800gtx, should be priced at least 30% higher than 9800gtx, no less than ~$329

if its actually priced at $229, it would probably be performing 1.3x faster than 9800gtx in one bench mark, and trail by 10-20% in all other benches.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: AshPhoenix
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.

As a guy with a 9800GTX in one of his rigs, I say 1.25X that level of performance for $229 is something everyone can be happy about.

:thumbsup:
 

Jax Omen

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2008
1,654
2
81
Originally posted by: nRollo
As a guy with a 9800GTX in one of his rigs, I say 1.25X that level of performance for $229 is something everyone can be happy about.

:thumbsup:

And this is why anyone who trashes the Focus Group members - for being focus group members - is just being a jerk.

Kudos on the objectivity, Rollo!




I love this new trend of lower costs instead of tremendously more power. We're still getting more power, but now we can actually ****ing afford it. Should be great for PC gaming. The lower the cost of entry in PC gaming, the more likely it will survive.
 

golem

Senior member
Oct 6, 2000
838
3
76
Originally posted by: SunnyD

Hardly. If they're pricing them in line, then I would handily applaud AMD for taking the step to bring quality performance at a REASONABLE price point. Seeing as NVIDIA consistently puts out high end cards with margins in excess of 100%... I would love to see a competing product priced at a more reasonable margin.

As a customer I would applaud them, if I was a shareholder, I'd be royally pissed.
 

dv8silencer

Member
May 7, 2008
142
0
0
Originally posted by: golem
Originally posted by: SunnyD

Hardly. If they're pricing them in line, then I would handily applaud AMD for taking the step to bring quality performance at a REASONABLE price point. Seeing as NVIDIA consistently puts out high end cards with margins in excess of 100%... I would love to see a competing product priced at a more reasonable margin.

As a customer I would applaud them, if I was a shareholder, I'd be royally pissed.

I mean, not necessarily, right? If this is what it takes for them to survive and get a better foothold in the market, then the shareholders should be happy. I'm sure they'd rather have a company that will live longer and may be more profitable in the future versus making money now and never coming back. Basically long-term vs. short-term
 

JPB

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2005
4,064
89
91
Originally posted by: nRollo
Originally posted by: AshPhoenix
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.

As a guy with a 9800GTX in one of his rigs, I say 1.25X that level of performance for $229 is something everyone can be happy about.

:thumbsup:

I agree. Now only if it comes true. I will be buying two of them
 

golem

Senior member
Oct 6, 2000
838
3
76
Originally posted by: dv8silencer
Originally posted by: golem
Originally posted by: SunnyD

Hardly. If they're pricing them in line, then I would handily applaud AMD for taking the step to bring quality performance at a REASONABLE price point. Seeing as NVIDIA consistently puts out high end cards with margins in excess of 100%... I would love to see a competing product priced at a more reasonable margin.

As a customer I would applaud them, if I was a shareholder, I'd be royally pissed.

I mean, not necessarily, right? If this is what it takes for them to survive and get a better foothold in the market, then the shareholders should be happy. I'm sure they'd rather have a company that will live longer and may be more profitable in the future versus making money now and never coming back. Basically long-term vs. short-term

That's the thing. They are just trying to survive right now and need all the cash they can get. Underpricing a product in a supply constrained situation ( I'm just assuming it's supply constrained since most mid to high end parts that are at least decent usually are at launch) means you're just giving money away. It does build goodwill, but goodwill is pointless if the company goes down the tubes because of lack of cash.

I actually do believe ATI has a lot of good will on their side due to their monthly driver updates and good cooling solutions, and underpricing would add to it, but right now, they need cash.
 

tvdang7

Platinum Member
Jun 4, 2005
2,242
5
81
is 30% faster than a 9800 gtx good? 50% would be more shocking....... owell i still want one.
 

JPB

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2005
4,064
89
91
Once these cards are launched, Of course I will be purchasing the 4870's. But I am anxious to see what the current 9800GTX and 3870 drops to in price.

In my opinion, I think 30% performance increase over the GTX is a nice gain. If the prices are true that is.

Regardless though and like I said...I will be having two in Crossfire.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
I think that we can all agree that they're not going to price them at $229 if they're 30% faster than 9800gtx unless they have to. So, either fuad is right and they'll be $229 with performance ~ 9800gtx or they'll have BETTER performance than the 9800gtx and will cost commensurately more.
 

Killrose

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 1999
6,230
8
81
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I think that we can all agree that they're not going to price them at $229 if they're 30% faster than 9800gtx unless they have to. So, either fuad is right and they'll be $229 with performance ~ 9800gtx or they'll have BETTER performance than the 9800gtx and will cost commensurately more.


Yeah, I just don't see ATi giving away a chance to make some money here. These things are going to be priced with their performance position. Hopefully they are better than a $229 card. Unless they have a 99% silicon yeild rate they might.
 

daveybrat

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jan 31, 2000
5,743
954
126
Originally posted by: nRollo
Originally posted by: AshPhoenix
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.

As a guy with a 9800GTX in one of his rigs, I say 1.25X that level of performance for $229 is something everyone can be happy about.

:thumbsup:

Rollo, you are a stand up guy. Even as a focus member, you can still see the benefit of good old fashioned competition. I've always been an Nvidia fan myself, but with these new cards coming out, i'm really excited about the new ATI cards.

I would really really hate to see a world without ATI around. We need ATI to keep Nvidia on their toes.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Assuming these performance numbers are correct, it looks like the upgrade bug will be biting me yet again. I was perfectly happy with my Opteron @ 2.56GHz, but wanted to build a new system. Right now I'm perfectly happy with my 2900Pro @ 800mhz, but I have a feeling I'll be stretching out my new Phenom/790FX systems legs even more with a 4870 if they are in the mid $200 range.

The rumor seems to be that AMD is focusing more on peformance per watt, so I'm guessing (hoping) that this means for those of us that don't mind pushing our power supplies a bit harder these should have some decent overclocking headroom. I guess we have to wait another month to find out for sure.

The one thing that seems to point in a more positive direction for this product launch from AMD is that, even though their not releasing official info they are letting some numbers get out from their partners. They were tight lipped until the end about the 2900XT, that turned out to be decent competition for the G80 GTS, but couldn't touch the G80 GTX. With Phenom it seemed that not a whole lot leaked before the launch either, and for obvious reason... the top binned Phenom is just barely able to keep up with a year old Q6600, and still can't touch it when you factor in performance per watt. Seems like with the Radeon 48xx more info is coming out as they have good product. Who knows, none of this is official information from AMD, but I am just getting that 'feel' for a lack of a better word in regards to this product launch.
 

ShadowOfMyself

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2006
4,230
2
0
I think its pretty amazing how prices on great computer components have come down lately! If the card really brings 9800 GTX + performance for 230$, thats a hell of a deal... And considering Cpus are so cheap since Core 2 Duo arrived, its amazing what kind of killer gaming rig you can get nowadays for less than 1000$... I hope Amd doesnt sink any time soon since they are the only thing in between both Nvidia and Intel and world domination/sky high prices

 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: daveybrat
Originally posted by: nRollo
Originally posted by: AshPhoenix
VR-Zone

RV770 Preliminary Performance Revealed

We have received some preliminary performance numbers from CJ for Radeon HD 4870 and 4850 vs the current GeForce 9800 series lineup. Apparently, RV770XT with GDDR5 (160W) will run 1.3X faster than RV770PRO with GDDR3 (110W). Two key factors that contribute to the 30% difference in performance between the 2 cards: a 100MHz core clock difference and a faster GDDR5 at 1.96GHz vs GDDR3 at 1GHz. Interesting, RV770PRO will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT while RV770XT will run 1.25X faster than GeForce 9800 GTX.

As a guy with a 9800GTX in one of his rigs, I say 1.25X that level of performance for $229 is something everyone can be happy about.

:thumbsup:

Rollo, you are a stand up guy. Even as a focus member, you can still see the benefit of good old fashioned competition. I've always been an Nvidia fan myself, but with these new cards coming out, i'm really excited about the new ATI cards.

I would really really hate to see a world without ATI around. We need ATI to keep Nvidia on their toes.

Thanks DaveyBrat and JaxOmen. :beer:

25% faster than a 9800GTX is a pretty damn fast card, by today's standards that would be the fastest single GPU card available.

It's hard to knock that at the price points being proposed.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Prices of HD4800 series

So basically, $349 for HD4870, $229 for HD4850 and $529-549 for the X2.

$349 MSRP at launch is still a fair price for a card across the board 25% faster than a 9800GTX- they're worth that if nV doesn't launch anything to compete with it.
 

idiotekniQues

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2007
2,572
0
71
this is all very exciting. if ati is going to go for price/performance ratio since they know they cant just out-clobber nvidia, we are in for good times in the enthusiast community.

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |