ATI A Cheater

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
funny, a bunch of claims with absolutely no evedence to back them up. granted, i didnt really expect anything more from Lars.
 

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,714
143
106
don't suprise me

companies like 3dfx and their HSR had been doing such things for awhile now
looks like ati took it one step farther and decided to not render things to their full quality in an attempt to gain performance rather than just not rendering stuff you don't see


ohh well it's their name riding on the product as long as both customer and supplier are happy i guess

 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: Soulkeeper
looks like ati took it one step farther and decided to not render things to their full quality in an attempt to gain performance rather than just not rendering stuff you don't see

were is ati doing that?
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
"For now, we don't want to comment on the optimizations found in ATi's drivers. "

Yet they spend about 3 pages on it.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
I'd chalk it up to ATI's software people not knowing how to write good drivers Like they could figure out how to cheat even if they wanted to, lol.

Let the flames begin
 

DefRef

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
4,041
1
81
Excuse me, but wasn't VIAN writing papers only a few weeks detailing how ATI was the innovator?

Interesting how in the span of a month, the tables have turned radically and suddenly ATI has to shake the label of "cheater" as the 52.16s seem to have done what the Fanchimps promised they WOULDN'T do - run faster with good quality and no cheats.

Interesting times we live in.
 

reever

Senior member
Oct 4, 2003
451
0
0
as the 52.16s seem to have done what the Fanchimps promised they WOULDN'T do - run faster with good quality and no cheats.

And it's still not fast enough to catch up to ATI, and please go read up on the new filtering method in the 50 series, they do exibit lower quality
 

Rage187

Lifer
Dec 30, 2000
14,276
4
81
^ thats because ATI is cheating to get the higher scores.



My, how the tables have turned.


SHAME on you ATI, I will never buy another one of your products, you CHEATING bastids.


lol, the shoe just went on the other foot.
 

Hipocracy at its finest...

We all know that both sides cheat. Its just that nvidia got caught and at the time, ATI did not. All focus was on nvidia "the cheaters" and ATI was the blessed little honest lamb.. Sheesh. Gull - A - Bull......

GM
 

reever

Senior member
Oct 4, 2003
451
0
0
Originally posted by: gorillaman
Hipocracy at its finest...

We all know that both sides cheat. Its just that nvidia got caught and at the time, ATI did not. All focus was on nvidia "the cheaters" and ATI was the blessed little honest lamb.. Sheesh. Gull - A - Bull......

GM

Right, I cant wait to see your next post detailing all of the cheats ATi was using that we missed
 

VIAN

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2003
6,575
1
0
In a month span, a lot was found out. I had no idea that ATI was cheating by lowering image resolution, and others. I have also understood Nvidia's case better. ATI is cheating the same way Nvidia was cheating, only that Nvidia is not as skilled as ATI is in fooling ones eye. I think that it is stupid that people are not now commenting on this as they were with Nvidia. It is cheating because they are lowering quality and not drawing the picture as its supposed to be, exactly what Nvidia did, only ATI was a little sneakier about it. I don't know if that is the cause for its such high performance, but I do know that it is still cheating, and if anything ATI is more to blame than Nvidia.
 

DefRef

Diamond Member
Nov 9, 2000
4,041
1
81
Originally posted by: reever
as the 52.16s seem to have done what the Fanchimps promised they WOULDN'T do - run faster with good quality and no cheats.

And it's still not fast enough to catch up to ATI, and please go read up on the new filtering method in the 50 series, they do exibit lower quality
Well, considering that ATI is CHEATING to gain speed, I guess nVidia's at a disadvantage and what's wrong with the filtering - all I've seen is praise.

Fanchimps take reality poorly.

 

reever

Senior member
Oct 4, 2003
451
0
0
Originally posted by: DefRef
Originally posted by: reever
as the 52.16s seem to have done what the Fanchimps promised they WOULDN'T do - run faster with good quality and no cheats.

And it's still not fast enough to catch up to ATI, and please go read up on the new filtering method in the 50 series, they do exibit lower quality
Well, considering that ATI is CHEATING to gain speed, I guess nVidia's at a disadvantage and what's wrong with the filtering - all I've seen is praise.

Fanchimps take reality poorly.

Or you take thruth poorly

http://3dcenter.de/artikel/detonator_52.14/
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTM3

I would love to see how you think ATI is cheating to gain speed as the speed and quality is still above Nvidias. And all of the "praise" you see for Nvidias filtering has went down the drain with the detonator 50 drivers
 

MichaelZ

Senior member
Oct 12, 2003
871
0
76
the hand wasn't quite seen in the cookie jar as far as ATI is concerned. one thing is for sure though. they ALL cheat. no doubt about it, whether all of them will be caught or not remains to be seen. i think gorillaman's comments aren't that far from the truth.
 

Reever, stop being so bitter my friend. I simply do not wish to do the digging. Whatever can be found will come out all on its own.
Just know this, all rumours have a little truth to them.. All rumours.. And it had to start somewhere.. It wasn't me if thats what your thinking. I personally dont care who cheats and how or why. I like both ATI and NV. Have both their hardware.
So it sounds like when people say that ATI cheats, you get personally insulted. Why? Whats your point? I'll tell you what your point is. "My ATI card, which I am married to, and have had little baby pipelines with, is my darling baby. Anyone so much as looks at my ATI card the wrong way will be killed a horrible and agonizing death. Nobody, but nobody talks about my baby that way.." Nyah, nyah, nyah nyah, nyah...

Paleeezze....

My 9700np is sitting on the shelf collecting dust. 5900 in box currently. I like it that way. I was keeping the 9700 around in case NV couldn't do something about the DX9 performance. It looks like they are on the right track so it looks like it will be staying on the shelf indefinately.

As far as image quality? I cant tell the difference at all. I guess maybe there could be a difference but I'm not one to disect every pixel on the image.

What was I talking about again? Oh yeah, dont be so bitter because there REALLY is no reason to be.
I hope for your sake you are not older than 20. Most people would be able to hear themselves and say, "My God, what am I doing? Do I really sound like that?" A small minority just cant be made to see themselves in the mirror.

GM
 

Reever, stop being so bitter my friend. I simply do not wish to do the digging. Whatever can be found will come out all on its own.
Just know this, all rumours have a little truth to them.. All rumours.. And it had to start somewhere.. It wasn't me if thats what your thinking. I personally dont care who cheats and how or why. I like both ATI and NV. Have both their hardware.
So it sounds like when people say that ATI cheats, you get personally insulted. Why? Whats your point? I'll tell you what your point is. "My ATI card, which I am married to, and have had little baby pipelines with, is my darling baby. Anyone so much as looks at my ATI card the wrong way will be killed a horrible and agonizing death. Nobody, but nobody talks about my baby that way.." Nyah, nyah, nyah nyah, nyah...

Paleeezze....

My 9700np is sitting on the shelf collecting dust. 5900 in box currently. I like it that way. I was keeping the 9700 around in case NV couldn't do something about the DX9 performance. It looks like they are on the right track so it looks like it will be staying on the shelf indefinately.

As far as image quality? I cant tell the difference at all. I guess maybe there could be a difference but I'm not one to disect every pixel on the image.

What was I talking about again? Oh yeah, dont be so bitter because there REALLY is no reason to be.
I hope for your sake you are not older than 20. Most people would be able to hear themselves and say, "My God, what am I doing? Do I really sound like that?" A small minority just cant be made to see themselves in the mirror.

GM

Oops, double post......
 

reever

Senior member
Oct 4, 2003
451
0
0
Sorry it's not bitterness, it's just that ignorance and close-mindedness offends me

it's not me getting personally offended, but it is just annoying when people make comments that have been proven to be false time and time again, but whenever the opportunity comes where it is an issue again, keep bringing it up
 

Richdog

Golden Member
Feb 10, 2003
1,658
0
0
I look forward to the day Anandtech forums holds an argument that is remotely reasonable and doesnt involve people insulting eachother like children. Maybe next year eh?:beer:
 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Originally posted by: gorillaman
My 9700np is sitting on the shelf collecting dust. 5900 in box currently. I like it that way. I was keeping the 9700 around in case NV couldn't do something about the DX9 performance. It looks like they are on the right track so it looks like it will be staying on the shelf indefinately.

This seems to be a common theme on these forums. The old I have a 5900ultra and a 9800pro, and the 5900 is in my main box. Like so what?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |