Barnaby W. Füi
Elite Member
- Aug 14, 2001
- 12,343
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: jliechty
Fusetalk may be reading the size specs from the ad company's server, so I wouldn't blame Anand right away. However, I'd like to know if there's any way to get Mozilla to ignore IFRAMEs; the regular ads I can put up with, but these flash ads are just rediculous. I thought that was an IE-only thing, anyway.Originally posted by: BingBongWongFooey
<iframe src="http://view.atdmt.com/CIB/iview/nndtcati00100003cib/direct/01?click=#747703#" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" topmargin="0" leftmargin="0" width="125" height="600">
sure seems that fusetalk know's its supposed to be 600 px tall, so it cant just be that they slipped in some rogue 600px tall images.
there most definitely is a way, its just a matter of figuring it out
with mozilla's everything-is-css-and-xml approach, you should be able to do a iframe { display: none; } somewhere, i'm just not sure where, or the exact syntax of it (xul css has some idiosynchrasies from run of the mill css)
in fact i've started wondering how i can tell mozilla to not display unloaded images (i.e. not display the empty "box" with the image icon in it, it's annoying, especially a page full of them while the page is loading)
try reading up on xul and userChrome.css on google, its interesting stuff. for example here is my rather simple userChrome.css:
#status-bar { font-size: larger !important; }
#throbber-box { display: none !important; }
.toolbargrippy { display: none !important; }
the first line makes the status bar text actually readable, the second line makes the mozilla "loading" animating icon thingie go away, and the third line gets rid of the grippies on the left of toolbars.
i just dont know if css for webpage contents goes here too, or if that's somewhere else.