skooma
Senior member
- Apr 13, 2006
- 635
- 28
- 91
:thumbsup: x 1000Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
From myperspective it is of no consequence how the campaign is run. There shouldn't have been a witch hunt last time, there shouldn't be one now, or in the future. It is simply another excuse for those with an agenda to prosecute it.Originally posted by: geo1
I posted about this at B3D several hours before it appeared here (if I'm reading the times right).
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31020
"viral marketing" covers a very wide range of activities, not all of them offensive in my view. And, yes, I said the same thing re AEG. . .I was one of those who refused to throw "viral marketing" under the bus generically.
Transparency is the key, in my view. Will HRC/ATI be better that way? Too soon to tell. As I said at B3D, a good start with these High Road people would be in they actually show up in the community and talk about what they are doing, and what they won't do, rather than have to be dragged into the light as was the case with AEG.
Nothing corporations do from a proaganda standpoint offends me, because I expect them to do whatever they believe they can "get away with". Cynical? Yes, but that cynicism has repeatedly proven to be justified.
"Transparency" will only give the propaganda machine a positive spin option, since the vilification of the AEG agents was so well excuted. I sincerely believe there are viral marketers with a pro-ATI agenda already among us, and evey other major manu too. I find it difficult to except it is all just pom pom shaking, perhaps because that is so much more pitiable than being "on the take" in my mind.
:beer: