ATI hires HRC PR Firm

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Originally posted by: Nelsieus
Originally posted by: Topweasel

Sor Far I reacieved both an inderect (BFG) and a direct (apoppin) apology for previous semi for the last witch hunt. Any one willing to step up and be like these very honorable men (monky Ackmed and Joker (sickbeast too but I think he is dead) I am looking at you)?

Unfourtunately, based on their (Ackmed and Joker)'s two sleezy posts above, I'm not too optimistic about them choosing credability / honor over their beloved ATI company. It's a pity, too, as it hurts munky's reputation for actually defending them (or should I say, failing to acknowledge them as even being actual trolls). :roll:

QFT!
kinda disappointed Munky actually defended them...
 

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Joker, you are such a troll + ati shill... OMG.....

I really feel sorry for munky now that he actually defended you..
 

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Originally posted by: BFG10K
Originally posted by: beggerking

once again you have no idea nor proof Fallen Angel is Rollo.
Yes we do and it was good enough for the mods despite the IP addresses not matching.

I've been around spectating the forum long before I join.
"Spectating" from another accout no doubt.

I find it interesting that the worst trolls generally seem to have the shortest registration times but claim they were here for much longer "spectating".

So who were you before you were banned?

I'm getting sick of your witch hunting for Rollo.
Why? What affiliation do you have with him? Did the AEG hire you to resurrect his career or something?

so i'm your "suspect" again? you really need some help..mentally.. why would you want to chase after Rollo and suspect everyone to be Rollo reborn?

My first account was many years which I have never logged on. so,

its alll in your head, all in your head. Rollo is gone now, so its time for you to apologize to everybody who you accused.
 

redbox

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2005
1,021
0
0
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: redbox


I was refering to Josh6079. You called hime a fanATIc with absolutly no evidence. Seriously do you all know how fast your arguments fall apart when you resort to name calling? It's debate 101 as soon as you start the name calling people start to doubt how true your argument is.

On another point how much of Josh6079 do you know? He has gone from a 6600gt to a 7800gt to 7800gt SLI and finaly an x1900xtx. Based on that past how on earth can you call that person a fanATIc? Please explain yourself in a detailed maner also. I grow tired of your sound bites.

argument fall apart when resort to name calling? read joker's post a couple posts above you.

were you actually here during the AEG outbreak? if you weren't, don't assume. many of us were victims and he was one of the accusers.

Yes I was here during the AEG thing. I don't like what joker does either, never said I did. However, lets not change the subject. I asked a direct question and you still did not answer me. Rather you brought up another totally separate person. Can you stay on topic maybe just once?
 

josh6079

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2006
3,261
0
0
You've made four SEPERATE posts. Can you not form your thoughts enough to simply say what you need to and put in in one post?

Also, what are you wanting beggerking? Topweasel wants an apology, Ackmed wants people to see that HRC isn't as bad as AEG, I'm wanting people to understand that the whole AEG/HRC thing still doesn't really matter unless it starts distorting/skewing website benchmards, etc. WTF do you want? So far all I can gather is you wanting to get your e-viagra from this thread. You are being a troll by:

1) Calling me a fanATIc without reason

2) Actually CARING if BFG is hunting for Trollo or not

3) Acusing Joker of being a shill without any confession on his part or evidence on your end.

So basically, you're doing a lot of worthless bantering while making every one of your sentences a post. Wasn't there a way to disable even seeing someone's posts? I know I heard some one talking about how to do it. I really need to use it with you since it would probably cut this thread in half on my part if I completely take you out of my view online.

EDIT: OMFG!! You made another one in the time it took me to write that post!! That's FIVE actual posts since I wrote ONE!!! You know there is an "Edit" tab right? And you still didn't say anything useful.

EDIT AGAIN (you watching beggerking?): This is one of your 5 previous posts:


Originally posted by: beggerking
Joker, you are such a troll + ati shill... OMG.....

I really feel sorry for munky now that he actually defended you..

If you notice, Joker isn't even on the page at the time you made that remark. Where in Zues's buthole did that come from? I could have understood if it directly followed one of his posts, but it didn't. You sounded like Napolean Dynamite. "God, I hate Joker, my epenis is chapped (because I've been rubbing it so much on my G70)".

You've got issues more so than someone constantly on the look out for Trollo followers.
 

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Originally posted by: redbox
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: redbox


I was refering to Josh6079. You called hime a fanATIc with absolutly no evidence. Seriously do you all know how fast your arguments fall apart when you resort to name calling? It's debate 101 as soon as you start the name calling people start to doubt how true your argument is.

On another point how much of Josh6079 do you know? He has gone from a 6600gt to a 7800gt to 7800gt SLI and finaly an x1900xtx. Based on that past how on earth can you call that person a fanATIc? Please explain yourself in a detailed maner also. I grow tired of your sound bites.

argument fall apart when resort to name calling? read joker's post a couple posts above you.

were you actually here during the AEG outbreak? if you weren't, don't assume. many of us were victims and he was one of the accusers.

Yes I was here during the AEG thing. I don't like what joker does either, never said I did. However, lets not change the subject. I asked a direct question and you still did not answer me. Rather you brought up another totally separate person. Can you stay on topic maybe just once?


you don't read do you?
he was one of the very outspoken accusers and I was one of the victim. call him a witchhunter or Atishill is no exaggeration.
 

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Originally posted by: josh6079

1) Calling me a fanATIc without reason

2) Actually CARING if BFG is hunting for Trollo or not

3) Acusing Joker of being a shill without any confession on his part or evidence on your end.

what I wanted : apology . Obviously you don't read or intentionally forget?( I believe you replied to my request for apology 2 pages ago)

1. you were very outspoken during the AEG witchhunt. don't see you apologize now.
2. if you are the one who he accuses, you'll care. This show how selfish you are.
3. that was from his post 2 pages ago, came out no where, no reasoning, nothing but personal callouts insults. And you are supporting him? wow.. please go back and read your own post a few pages ago of how you dislike the AEG witchhunt.

Josh6079:
I think that pretty much sums up what beggerking, Wreckage, yourself and a few other want. Is just for those who were harsh about AEG to be harsh about HRC. But you can't talk about AEG or HRC because everyone is arguing about eachother and what they said (or didn't say). To me, Ackmed was extremely biased for thinking that HRC wasn't as bad as AEG. People, they are both contribute to viral marketing.....that's not good.
and now you are supporting the very person(joker) who started the whole flame war.

your credibility is now in the toilet.
 

redbox

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2005
1,021
0
0
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: redbox
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: redbox


I was refering to Josh6079. You called hime a fanATIc with absolutly no evidence. Seriously do you all know how fast your arguments fall apart when you resort to name calling? It's debate 101 as soon as you start the name calling people start to doubt how true your argument is.

On another point how much of Josh6079 do you know? He has gone from a 6600gt to a 7800gt to 7800gt SLI and finaly an x1900xtx. Based on that past how on earth can you call that person a fanATIc? Please explain yourself in a detailed maner also. I grow tired of your sound bites.

argument fall apart when resort to name calling? read joker's post a couple posts above you.

were you actually here during the AEG outbreak? if you weren't, don't assume. many of us were victims and he was one of the accusers.

Yes I was here during the AEG thing. I don't like what joker does either, never said I did. However, lets not change the subject. I asked a direct question and you still did not answer me. Rather you brought up another totally separate person. Can you stay on topic maybe just once?


you don't read do you?
he was one of the very outspoken accusers and I was one of the victim. call him a witchhunter or Atishill is no exaggeration.

Read the BOLD I was only talking about Josh6079 and how you called him a fanATIc without reason, and went on to say he was very outspoken during the aeg witchhunt and you where a victim. Josh6079 WAS NOT HERE DURING THE AEG THING, HE DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF BEING AEG. I really hope this was just a misunderstanding.

Josh6079's join date is: 3/17/2006
The AEG thread got locked: 2/22/2006

Just who is this person you say victimized you?
 

josh6079

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2006
3,261
0
0
It all started between you and me here:

Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: josh6079
Originally posted by: BFG10K
Originally posted by: Topweasel
But I will call out every single user who tries to brush this off, after being so venomous about it before.

People in my eye sights are, Munky, Joker, Turtle, BFG, Appopin, and a few other that will occur to me later. Honestly though I doubt we will hear from them on this as its a lose lose, they either have Put down the same company they Idolize or they come off as a hyppocrite.
Oh you are just too funny, accusing me of being an ATi shill when ironically I've been accused of being an AEG member in the past.

I tell it like it is and that appears to cause some kind of reasoning short circuit with the trolls in both camps.

QFT.

Yeah Topweasel, you have really got to get some facts straight. I don't want to seem like BFG's Robin character, but he has always provided help on both ends and even backed himself up with corporate evidence (Nvidia driver release notes, nHancer capabilites--remember that Gstandfor--and all the like). I have yet to see him blatantly say "I love Nvidia" or "I love ATI". Put your pistol back in its holster and quit shooting "fanboy" like you've got parkinson's disease.


From what I've seen, you are Pro-ATI as well. BFG is an fanATIc and so are you.

That's when you and I started talking on this thread.

then I said this:

Wow guy, you're blowing things way out of proportion. If you are classified as a fanATIc/Nvidiot because you like a card that is an ATI/Nvidia make, so be it. Yes, I am happy with my X1900XTX. Before it was out, I was happy with my 7800GT's. You are not the first to call BFG a fanATIc, he has been called both a fanATIc and an Nvidiot.

All I thought about Topweasel's statement was that he said it without really knowing that right now, BFG has a 7800 series NVIDIA card, an X800 card, and a very common consensus to buy what is worth getting for themselves. You have just labeled me as a fanATIc. Okay. Does that automatically make you an Nvidiot in my eyes? No. If these were the days when the 78 series had no competition you probably would have said I was an Nvidiot too. I'm just saying I have yet to see BFG take a firm stance on any company. Topweasel labeled him with a group of other highly veiwed "fanATIc's" and I believe he did so wrongly. That was it.

Maybe that is what made you think I was ("am") a fanATIc in your eyes. But dam, I'm sick of looking on these Anandtech Video forums and seeing nothing but aimless "fanboy" accusations. I bought the X1900XTX because I wanted to see how it would compare. I did so because I quite honestly didn't trust anyone on the web to tell me truthfully. I sold one 7800GT to a friend, and gave one to my brother, the cards that I used to have and respected. God forbid anyone has ever gotten rid of older hardware. Sorry beggerking, it wont happen again.

Right now, a lot of people are having such heated debates because the competition between the graphics throne is like a tag team match for female mud wrestling. Nvidia is the best!, then ATI comes up with something (in this case, the X1 series), then Nvidia is the best again (probably the Quad-SLI capability--yeah, that would be nice if G80's could be x4!), then ATI will probably come up with something. It is a constant non-monopoly which is what it should be. There are no "Kings" as some would blindly say, and there really are not as many fanboys as people think there are. Kind of like diagnosing imaginative children with A.D.D. Of course they're not concentrating on what you want them to, they're 8! Once again, I'll state it clearly:

1) People who are happy with their product are NOT fanboys.

2) People who bash the opposing product, while pointing out flaws that are shared with their own products ARE a fanboys.

3) People who speculate or give opinions about what "the other side" is like, without saying or making it knowledgeable that they are speculating or opinionating ARE fanboys.

I'm not going to add to the pointing fingers group, but I will say that so far I've only seen one fanATIc and one Nvidiot fanboy in these forums. (Sorry I missed the Rollo days and I barely got a glimpse of the FallenAngel nights). The rest, is just aimless accusations that always seemed to end up in pages worth of nothing but flames.

Sorry if I've offended you Topweasel when I disagreed with you, or Gstandfor when I mentioned your name in that and even when disagreeing with your methods of using the nHancer AA+HDR circus, or CaiNaM when you were arguing with Joker, etc. Truth is, when I've needed help with things, I've never received a negative feedback of PM's from many supposed Nvidiots and fanATIc's. Some just know what they're talking about a little more than others.

So, I'll be a fanATIc if it means being happy that my X1900XTX is better than my 7800GT's SLI, and in the future I'll be an Nvidiot if G80's come in Quad and kill any other DX10 card.

From there pages went by and we didn't say anything until I said:

Originally posted by: josh6079
You've made four SEPERATE posts. Can you not form your thoughts enough to simply say what you need to and put in in one post?

Also, what are you wanting beggerking? Topweasel wants an apology, Ackmed wants people to see that HRC isn't as bad as AEG, I'm wanting people to understand that the whole AEG/HRC thing still doesn't really matter unless it starts distorting/skewing website benchmards, etc. WTF do you want? So far all I can gather is you wanting to get your e-viagra from this thread. You are being a troll by:

1) Calling me a fanATIc without reason

2) Actually CARING if BFG is hunting for Trollo or not

3) Acusing Joker of being a shill without any confession on his part or evidence on your end.

So basically, you're doing a lot of worthless bantering while making every one of your sentences a post. Wasn't there a way to disable even seeing someone's posts? I know I heard some one talking about how to do it. I really need to use it with you since it would probably cut this thread in half on my part if I completely take you out of my view online.

EDIT: OMFG!! You made another one in the time it took me to write that post!! That's FIVE actual posts since I wrote ONE!!! You know there is an "Edit" tab right? And you still didn't say anything useful.

EDIT AGAIN (you watching beggerking?): This is one of your 5 previous posts:


Originally posted by: beggerking
Joker, you are such a troll + ati shill... OMG.....

I really feel sorry for munky now that he actually defended you..

If you notice, Joker isn't even on the page at the time you made that remark. Where in Zues's buthole did that come from? I could have understood if it directly followed one of his posts, but it didn't. You sounded like Napolean Dynamite. "God, I hate Joker, my epenis is chapped (because I've been rubbing it so much on my G70)".

You've got issues more so than someone constantly on the look out for Trollo followers.

And your reply was:

what I wanted : apology . Obviously you don't read or intentionally forget?( I believe you replied to my request for apology 2 pages ago)

1. you were very outspoken during the AEG witchhunt. don't see you apologize now.
2. if you are the one who he accuses, you'll care. This show how selfish you are.
3. that was from his post 2 pages ago, came out no where, no reasoning, nothing but personal callouts insults. And you are supporting him? wow.. please go back and read your own post a few pages ago of how you dislike the AEG witchhunt.

and

and now you are supporting the very person(joker) who started the whole flame war.

your credibility is now in the toilet.

This is amusing. I wasn't even around when Rollo was here, thus wasn't even here for the AEG witchunt where I supposedly caused you so much damage. And you want me to apologize? For what? Not being there?

And when did I say I was supporting Joker? Never. The most I've done is support BFG when I thought, and I wasn't alone on this, Topweasel labeled him as a fanATIc. Once Topweasel clarified what he meant, I didn't comment any further.

Your #3 reason didn't help your justification on the matter. You said it yourself, it was from what...2 pages ago!! And you had to actually post yet another useless comment like "God Joker you're such a shill"?!? You really don't know what you're talking about and right now are just trolling.
 

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Originally posted by: redbox
Read the BOLD I was only talking about Josh6079 and how you called him a fanATIc without reason, and went on to say he was very outspoken during the aeg witchhunt and you where a victim. Josh6079 WAS NOT HERE DURING THE AEG THING, HE DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF BEING AEG. I really hope this was just a misunderstanding.

Josh6079's join date is: 3/17/2006
The AEG thread got locked: 2/22/2006

Just who is this person you say victimized you?

edit: obviously you are the same utterly biased fanATIc I recognized.


Here is my question to you . WHY:

BFG accused ME of AEG aff, you overlooked that, and wondered why I care?

I just read that post from 2 pages about Joker from 2 pages ago, I replied so it ended up here. why are you accusing me of trolling ? don't you think Joker is a shill? so do you approve/disapprove of him and his participation in the AEG thread?
 

josh6079

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2006
3,261
0
0
First off, its good that you apologized. Lesser people wouldn't have done so.

Why don't I care if BFG called you an AEG, because right now I think there is zero evidence for anyone to call anyone else a shill. Suspiction is one thing, but to acuse is another. If people are going to start calling others a shill, then however they are going about doing it is of their own concern, not mine.

I do, however, interrupt when people start throwing around fanboy or troll without any thought behind it, which is what you were doing. So to answer your obsessive question about Joker, no, I do not think he is a shill just like I don't think you are a shill. As far as his participation goes, he hasn't gotten anyone confused and began mislableing them as a fanboy or witchunter nor does he say useless things like, "beggerking you are such a fan + shill...OMG..." Does this mean I'll follow him into the pits of hell? No. It just means that I think you have derailed this thread more than him.

Even if you were reading Jokers post from 2 pages ago and accidently posted it, there is an "EDIT" tab to explain the vague and misplaced comment you left.

And if you're really that damaged from someone calling you an AEG (personally I would just laugh considering they would simply be going off a huntch) here is some advice:

ADVICE LINK
 

redbox

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2005
1,021
0
0
Originally posted by: beggerking


fine. I apologize for accuse him of participating in the AEG thread. I must have mistaken him for somebody else.

Here is my question to you . WHY:

BFG accused ME of AEG aff, you overlooked that, and wondered why I care?

I just read that post from 2 pages about Joker from 2 pages ago, I replied so it ended up here. why are you accusing me of trolling ? don't you think Joker is a shill? so do you approve/disapprove of him and his participation in the AEG thread?

I don't approve of Joker on the basis of this: 5150Joker calling for the ban of AEG members Now there are some important things to consider here.

1. Rollo confessed to being AEG.
2. It is true that most threads involving Rollo resulted in flame wars that pretty much didn't help the forum.

Now the only difference I see between this HRC thing and AEG is that people confesed with the AEG thing. I don't think banning rollo has had much effect here in video. we still get trolls and flame wars. I have witnessed it on both sides from both you beggerkind and 5150Joker. Like I have said before instead of pointing fingers at each other and trying to get this person banned, or this person to say sorry to us, or conduct a witchhunt, we should make it known to these companies that we do not appreciate being marketed at like this.

And because of this belief of mine I find it unsettling that 5150Joker has lost some of his gall. His calling of the ban was (I belive) not only because it was Rollo, whom he hated so much, but because this was a business practise that he found repulsive. If that is the case, and who am I to put words in 5150Joker's mouth, but if that is the case then why can't we have a preemptive course of action on this. Why do we have to wait untill someone is as bad as Rollo was said to be, before we do something about it? Why do something at all to the person they hire? They will just find another one. Most people on this forum if offered free or discounted video cards would jump right on that deal. You have to go to the source of the problem not just it's symptoms.

Anyway that is how I feel about it.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
What I find amusing is Beggerking trying to act like a victim here. Go back to the first 14 or so pages of this thread and what you will see is beggerking mentioning me in just about every single one of his posts. What most of these rabid nVidia supporters are upset about is the fact that I started a thread in FI to get Rollo banned (who I was friends with at the time) because I felt shills had no place here. My position since then hasn't changed nor will it ever change regardless of who it may be. In fact, beggerking, accusing people of being shills like you are doing is basis for a permanent ban according to the mods - the fact you have accused me of being a shill repeatedly in this thread in hopes of inciting inflammatory responses is proof of this fact.

The funny thing is, despite the AEG fiasco, I still talk to Rollo via PM on another forum and expressed my regret that the AEG issue caused a rift in our friendship at the time. That said, I'll reiterate once again that my position on this issue will never change, shills should be banned from these forums regardless of whether they work for nVidia or ATi. If we discover someone here being an ATi shill, I'll help in getting him/her removed from here.

Many nVidia zealots here have an axe to grind with me and other ATi fans simply because this place used to be dominated by their biased way of thinking. Now that they have equally zealous fans from the other camp countering their FUD, they take issue with it - that's simply a balance. Does advertising ATi cards in my sig make me a shill? If you have one iota of intelligence, the obvious answer should be a resounding no since a viral marketer would never expose himself like that. What it does demonstrate is that by simply posting great ATi deals in my sig, it annoyed the hell out of nVidia zealots who can't stand to see anything pro-ATi, even if it's in the best interest of consumers.

DeathReborn: After I created some modded bios files (Dell doesn't allow overclocks via the nV panel), another guy got his 7900 Go GS to around 480/1150 and ~7500 3dmark05 points so the card is only 1000 pts shy of the much more expensive 7900 go gtx found in $3500 XPS M1710 systems. So I'd say it's got a hell of a lot of potential despite being a 20 pp/7 vs card. I'm having quite a bit of fun with it - it just sucks that I have had to put in for 3 RMA's for my LCD panel due to various issues.
 

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
Originally posted by: josh6079
First off, its good that you apologized. Lesser people wouldn't have done so.

Why don't I care if BFG called you an AEG, because right now I think there is zero evidence for anyone to call anyone else a shill. Suspiction is one thing, but to acuse is another. If people are going to start calling others a shill, then however they are going about doing it is of their own concern, not mine.

I do, however, interrupt when people start throwing around fanboy or troll without any thought behind it, which is what you were doing. So to answer your obsessive question about Joker, no, I do not think he is a shill just like I don't think you are a shill. As far as his participation goes, he hasn't gotten anyone confused and began mislableing them as a fanboy or witchunter nor does he say useless things like, "beggerking you are such a fan + shill...OMG..." Does this mean I'll follow him into the pits of hell? No. It just means that I think you have derailed this thread more than him.

Even if you were reading Jokers post from 2 pages ago and accidently posted it, there is an "EDIT" tab to explain the vague and misplaced comment you left.

And if you're really that damaged from someone calling you an AEG (personally I would just laugh considering they would simply be going off a huntch) here is some advice:

ADVICE LINK

Joker is doing personal insults, accusing me of AEG along with BFG, and they've done it ever since. And you are excusing them ?

Now I know why I remember you as the utterly biased.



to redbox:
1. Rollo confessed after repeat attempts to prosecute him. He had denied many times and was finally so annoyed with all the Fanatics that he said "whatever!" IMO he isn't as bad as Joker who posted ATI hotdeals in his sig, and the degree of name calling, personal insult is way worst than Rollo.

2.it is even truer with Joker's thread. At least Rollo(sometimes) has some reasoning.
if you repeatly ask Joker to confess , after a while he will. its basic human nature/psychology, people just get fed up.

Joker finds AEG repulsive? what about his own signature ads?

to Joker:

your wordings are just offensive and complete FUD. you talk about shills yet yourself is the biggest shill here.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: josh6079
First off, its good that you apologized. Lesser people wouldn't have done so.

Why don't I care if BFG called you an AEG, because right now I think there is zero evidence for anyone to call anyone else a shill. Suspiction is one thing, but to acuse is another. If people are going to start calling others a shill, then however they are going about doing it is of their own concern, not mine.

I do, however, interrupt when people start throwing around fanboy or troll without any thought behind it, which is what you were doing. So to answer your obsessive question about Joker, no, I do not think he is a shill just like I don't think you are a shill. As far as his participation goes, he hasn't gotten anyone confused and began mislableing them as a fanboy or witchunter nor does he say useless things like, "beggerking you are such a fan + shill...OMG..." Does this mean I'll follow him into the pits of hell? No. It just means that I think you have derailed this thread more than him.

Even if you were reading Jokers post from 2 pages ago and accidently posted it, there is an "EDIT" tab to explain the vague and misplaced comment you left.

And if you're really that damaged from someone calling you an AEG (personally I would just laugh considering they would simply be going off a huntch) here is some advice:

ADVICE LINK

Joker is doing personal insults, accusing me of AEG along with BFG, and they've done it ever since. And you are excusing them ?

Now I know why I remember you as the utterly biased.



to redbox:
1. Rollo confessed after repeat attempts to prosecute him. He had denied many times and was finally so annoyed with all the Fanatics that he said "whatever!" IMO he isn't as bad as Joker who posted ATI hotdeals in his sig, and the degree of name calling, personal insult is way worst than Rollo.

2.it is even truer with Joker's thread. At least Rollo(sometimes) has some reasoning.
if you repeatly ask Joker to confess , after a while he will. its basic human nature/psychology, people just get fed up.

Joker finds AEG repulsive? what about his own signature ads?

to Joker:

your wordings are just offensive and complete FUD. you talk about shills yet yourself is the biggest shill here.



Sweet, keep digging your grave. This is all the proof mods need that beggerking is out to flamebait and admittedly trolls in a vain attempt to get some sort of "confession".
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking

Joker is worse than Rollo that he always resorts to personal attacks.
ATI HRC beta testers ( Joker , exterron?)

btw, almost all corperations conduct this kind of marketing in one form or the other.
Worse to you.

i just don't take Joker's pro-ATi FUD seriously

otoh, Rollo singled me out for abuse.

LAST TIME . . . [i know] . . . i HATE the stealth viral marketing programmes. Transparancy makes it somewhat acceptable.

gotta go . . . bookmarked


so here is your forumula

iif(user.attribute <> proATI, witchhunt+takeseriously+ban+bloodhound,null)
no, your formulae.
:thumbsdown:
++++++++++++++++++++++
Originally posted by: Nelsieus
Originally posted by: apoppin

i just have NO INFO [yet] on HOW ati plans to implement it . . . when and if i find out, i can be more vocal in my protesting.

IF it is 100% transparant - ALL posters disclose their affiliations - theni am mostly OK with it

Hmm, so in other words, let's give HRC the benefit of the doubt. Funny that you decided to take a whole different approach, though, when it came to AEG.

Also, way to compromise your standards by holding on to a shread of hope that your favored co. ATI won't let you down. I guess, though, you're trying to save yourself from the embarrasment of actually coming out and saying "Yea, I was wrong."

Let's not kid ourselves; we're witnessing nothing more than a little fanboy who's realizing how two-faced he looks right now, and going on damage control full force.

Good luck with that. :roll:

are you really as clueless as you appear?

AEG/nVidia's approach is STEALTH . . . *CONFIRMED*
. . . they hired Rollo to disrupt these forums . . . *FACT*

OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach

 

Nelsieus

Senior member
Mar 11, 2006
330
0
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking

Joker is worse than Rollo that he always resorts to personal attacks.
ATI HRC beta testers ( Joker , exterron?)

btw, almost all corperations conduct this kind of marketing in one form or the other.
Worse to you.

i just don't take Joker's pro-ATi FUD seriously

otoh, Rollo singled me out for abuse.

LAST TIME . . . [i know] . . . i HATE the stealth viral marketing programmes. Transparancy makes it somewhat acceptable.

gotta go . . . bookmarked


so here is your forumula

iif(user.attribute <> proATI, witchhunt+takeseriously+ban+bloodhound,null)
no, your formulae.
:thumbsdown:
++++++++++++++++++++++
Originally posted by: Nelsieus
Originally posted by: apoppin

i just have NO INFO [yet] on HOW ati plans to implement it . . . when and if i find out, i can be more vocal in my protesting.

IF it is 100% transparant - ALL posters disclose their affiliations - theni am mostly OK with it

Hmm, so in other words, let's give HRC the benefit of the doubt. Funny that you decided to take a whole different approach, though, when it came to AEG.
Also, way to compromise your standards by holding on to a shread of hope that your favored co. ATI won't let you down. I guess, though, you're trying to save yourself from the embarrasment of actually coming out and saying "Yea, I was wrong."

Let's not kid ourselves; we're witnessing nothing more than a little fanboy who's realizing how two-faced he looks right now, and going on damage control full force.

Good luck with that. :roll:

are you really as clueless as you appear?

AEG/nVidia's approach is STEALTH . . . *CONFIRMED*
. . . they hired Rollo to disrupt these forums . . . *FACT*

OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach

 

redbox

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2005
1,021
0
0
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
I started a thread in FI to get Rollo banned (who I was friends with at the time) because I felt shills had no place here.

I don't agree with hidden agenda's. However, I would not go as far to say that just because of your employer you shouldn't be allowed to participate in a thread. If I had a hidden intrest in ATI or Nvidia's success i.e. stock. Would you consider me a shill, would you try to ban me because of my private intrests purely because of the fact that it would alter my opinion?

In fact, beggerking, accusing people of being shills like you are doing is basis for a permanent ban according to the mods

I seem to remember alot of baseless acusation flying around during the AEG days. I didn't see the mods come in and ban eveyone that accused someone of being a shill.

Now that they have equally zealous fans from the other camp countering their FUD, they take issue with it - that's simply a balance.

I didn't think these forums where a place to balance ''an axis of evil' , rather I thought it ws to bring something of use to the forum. i.e. video card specs, overclocking news, drivers, questions. Furthermore I always beleived that it was Rollo's trolling and flaming that everyone wanted him banned for. The AEG was just the straw that broke the camels back. Now that you admit to being equaliy zealous as the other camp spreading FUD. Is it hard to understand why alot of users don't like your presence here?
 

John Reynolds

Member
Dec 6, 2005
119
0
0
Well, I think it more fair to say that Rollo chose to disrupt whatever forums he frequented. I highly doubt AEG/NVIDIA endorse or promote Rollo's posting style (especially considering he just got banned at last week by Kyle himself).
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Nelsieus
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking

Joker is worse than Rollo that he always resorts to personal attacks.
ATI HRC beta testers ( Joker , exterron?)

btw, almost all corperations conduct this kind of marketing in one form or the other.
Worse to you.

i just don't take Joker's pro-ATi FUD seriously

otoh, Rollo singled me out for abuse.

LAST TIME . . . [i know] . . . i HATE the stealth viral marketing programmes. Transparancy makes it somewhat acceptable.

gotta go . . . bookmarked


so here is your forumula

iif(user.attribute <> proATI, witchhunt+takeseriously+ban+bloodhound,null)
no, your formulae.
:thumbsdown:
++++++++++++++++++++++
Originally posted by: Nelsieus
Originally posted by: apoppin

i just have NO INFO [yet] on HOW ati plans to implement it . . . when and if i find out, i can be more vocal in my protesting.

IF it is 100% transparant - ALL posters disclose their affiliations - theni am mostly OK with it

Hmm, so in other words, let's give HRC the benefit of the doubt. Funny that you decided to take a whole different approach, though, when it came to AEG.
Also, way to compromise your standards by holding on to a shread of hope that your favored co. ATI won't let you down. I guess, though, you're trying to save yourself from the embarrasment of actually coming out and saying "Yea, I was wrong."

Let's not kid ourselves; we're witnessing nothing more than a little fanboy who's realizing how two-faced he looks right now, and going on damage control full force.

Good luck with that. :roll:

are you really as clueless as you appear?

AEG/nVidia's approach is STEALTH . . . *CONFIRMED*
. . . they hired Rollo to disrupt these forums . . . *FACT*

OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach

:roll:
_________________
Originally posted by: John Reynolds
Well, I think it more fair to say that Rollo chose to disrupt whatever forums he frequented. I highly doubt AEG/NVIDIA endorse or promote Rollo's posting style (especially considering he just got banned at [] last week by Kyle himself).
AEG evidently hired him and he remained in good standing with them [and nVidia] . . . until he got exposed.
 

redbox

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2005
1,021
0
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: beggerking

Joker is worse than Rollo that he always resorts to personal attacks.
ATI HRC beta testers ( Joker , exterron?)

btw, almost all corperations conduct this kind of marketing in one form or the other.
Worse to you.

i just don't take Joker's pro-ATi FUD seriously

otoh, Rollo singled me out for abuse.

LAST TIME . . . [i know] . . . i HATE the stealth viral marketing programmes. Transparancy makes it somewhat acceptable.

gotta go . . . bookmarked


so here is your forumula

iif(user.attribute <> proATI, witchhunt+takeseriously+ban+bloodhound,null)
no, your formulae.
:thumbsdown:
++++++++++++++++++++++
Originally posted by: Nelsieus
Originally posted by: apoppin

i just have NO INFO [yet] on HOW ati plans to implement it . . . when and if i find out, i can be more vocal in my protesting.

IF it is 100% transparant - ALL posters disclose their affiliations - theni am mostly OK with it

Hmm, so in other words, let's give HRC the benefit of the doubt. Funny that you decided to take a whole different approach, though, when it came to AEG.

Also, way to compromise your standards by holding on to a shread of hope that your favored co. ATI won't let you down. I guess, though, you're trying to save yourself from the embarrasment of actually coming out and saying "Yea, I was wrong."

Let's not kid ourselves; we're witnessing nothing more than a little fanboy who's realizing how two-faced he looks right now, and going on damage control full force.

Good luck with that. :roll:

are you really as clueless as you appear?

AEG/nVidia's approach is STEALTH . . . *CONFIRMED*
. . . they hired Rollo to disrupt these forums . . . *FACT*

OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach

ummmm "OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach" .... Ya, it seams like ATI are already EXTREMLY transparent about their viral marketing.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: redbox

ummmm "OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach" .... Ya, it seams like ATI are already EXTREMLY transparent about their viral marketing.
so what DO we KNOW about ATi's approach?

Do you when they started using HRC's Firm?

Anyone want to e-mail theConsumerist about this?

Or are you just "talking"?
:roll:
 

redbox

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2005
1,021
0
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: redbox

ummmm "OTOH, we don't know anything about ATI's approach" .... Ya, it seams like ATI are already EXTREMLY transparent about their viral marketing.
so what DO we KNOW about ATi's approach?

Do you when they started using HRC's Firm?

Anyone want to e-mail theConsumerist about this?

Or are you just "talking"?
:roll:

I was just talking about our basic lack of info on ATI's part with regard to this viral marketing. I'll look into that consumerist thing.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |