IronWing
No Lifer
- Jul 20, 2001
- 70,194
- 28,883
- 136
Buckle up, it's going to be a rough ride!
Buckle up, it's going to be a rough ride!
Yeah, I have no idea why anyone puts up with that either.If it took me 1 hour to drive 18 miles. I would work from home or find another job.
Yeah, I have no idea why anyone puts up with that either.
The heat from the flames should provide a rising column of air. That should be enough.
No, I'm lucky and probably have it better than most people. If you live in or near a big city, traffic is just something you learn to deal with. My commute is pretty flexible for the most part. I only work about an hour or two few days a week. Today I came home at 10:30 am.If it took me 1 hour to drive 18 miles. I would work from home or find another job.
No, I'm lucky and probably have it better than most people. If you live in or near a big city, traffic is just something you learn to deal with. My commute is pretty flexible for the most part. I only work about an hour or two few days a week. Today I came home at 10:30 am.
I'm sure if you give a person an option of A) working 40 hours a week with zero commute time or B) working about 6 hours a week but having to spend another 6 hours in commute with total time spent of 12 hours, everyone would choose option B. And as a bonus, option B salary is multiple times of option A.Lucky would be commuting in the direction everyone isn't, or not commuting at all. My last two jobs have had me driving west while the eastbound side is a parking lot, then when I'd come home the situation would be reversed, and that was nice. No one that averages 18mph on the highway is lucky when it comes to their commute, 18mph is for bicycles.
This morning was the first day I drove to downtown for work since the bridge collapse. Took me one and half hours to drive 18 miles. Before it was about an hour. So my morning commute is taking me extra 30 minutes. Better than I expected.
I'm sure if you give a person an option of A) working 40 hours a week with zero commute time or B) working about 6 hours a week but having to spend another 6 hours in commute with total time spent of 12 hours, everyone would choose option B. And as a bonus, option B salary is multiple times of option A.
I paid my dues and did 60-100 hours a week for about 10 years. No way I would voluntarily go back to working even 40 hours a week now. Yesterday, I did my 1 hour of work. Today, I'm chilling at home in my pajamas eating breakfast and drinking coffee. After breakfast, I'll probably go for a walk in the park with my wife and plan what I want to cook for lunch and dinner. Work is getting done. I pay others to do it.Not in the slightest, I'd rather have enough work to do to warrant actually working 40 hours than sit in traffic for 6 hours a week. If I only had 6 hours of work to do a week in a given job I'd just find another job.
I paid my dues and did 60-100 hours a week for about 10 years. No way I would voluntarily go back to working even 40 hours a week now. Yesterday, I did my 1 hour of work. Today, I'm chilling at home in my pajamas eating breakfast and drinking coffee. After breakfast, I'll probably go for a walk in the park with my wife and plan what I want to cook for lunch and dinner. Work is getting done. I pay others to do it.
Not in the slightest, I'd rather have enough work to do to warrant actually working 40 hours than sit in traffic for 6 hours a week. If I only had 6 hours of work to do a week in a given job I'd just find another job.
Having said that, if you're working 60-100 hours a week without being exceptionally well compensated you might be doing it wrong
Next: The zombie apocalypse as depicted in The Walking Dead.
I think they just film live traffic in Atlanta for the highway scenes in TWD.