- Apr 8, 2013
- 16,189
- 14,102
- 136
Are you guys following what is happening in Iraq right now? Evidently we conducted airstrikes against an Iran backed militia group there, after the group fired rockets which killed a US contractor and injured several servicemen. In response, today the militias attacked our embassy, tried to breach it and set fires. All the while it appears that Iraqi security forces sat idle.
Peter Bergen writes this foolish editorial whereby he explains that Trump's decision to conduct the airstrikes is a "sensible use of force." He's calling it the emerging "Trump doctrine." He forgets that Trump must first know what a doctrine is in order to have one. More to the point, of course the airstrikes were justified when viewed in isolation. They attacked us, so we attack them back. What's missing from the editorial is why these Iran backed militias are attacking us.
They are attacking us because the Trump admin chose to pull out of the negotiated nuclear deal and start economic warfare against Iran.
I don't think Trump actually wants to go to war with Iran. But his pandering to his Iran hating base and the dishonest right wing propaganda over the nuclear deal has put us in a position where we're already fighting the early stages of a proxy war with Iran. One which could get a lot worse. Trump may not want war, but when we're directly attacked, he has no choice but to respond with force. Which causes a cascading escalation of violence.
Trump created this bed we are all now lying on. It's going to be a nightmare for whoever sits in the oval after he's gone.
US sending additional forces to protect embassy threatened by protesters in Iraq
The United States will send approximately 750 soldiers to the Middle East immediately, Defense Secretary Mark Esper confirmed in a written statement Tuesday, after attacks broke out in Baghdad among hundreds of protesters in response to airstrikes in Iraq and Syria conducted by US forces on Sunday.
www.cnn.com
Peter Bergen writes this foolish editorial whereby he explains that Trump's decision to conduct the airstrikes is a "sensible use of force." He's calling it the emerging "Trump doctrine." He forgets that Trump must first know what a doctrine is in order to have one. More to the point, of course the airstrikes were justified when viewed in isolation. They attacked us, so we attack them back. What's missing from the editorial is why these Iran backed militias are attacking us.
They are attacking us because the Trump admin chose to pull out of the negotiated nuclear deal and start economic warfare against Iran.
I don't think Trump actually wants to go to war with Iran. But his pandering to his Iran hating base and the dishonest right wing propaganda over the nuclear deal has put us in a position where we're already fighting the early stages of a proxy war with Iran. One which could get a lot worse. Trump may not want war, but when we're directly attacked, he has no choice but to respond with force. Which causes a cascading escalation of violence.
Trump created this bed we are all now lying on. It's going to be a nightmare for whoever sits in the oval after he's gone.