youngsatchmo
Member
- Nov 20, 2008
- 26
- 0
- 0
This post needs to be updated now that the Corei7 is out. That should be the recommended CPU for high-end systems.
Originally posted by: GhandiInstinct
Can someone please explain why SLI/Crossfire is recommended for LCD's 24" and up? I have a 46" HDTV that I game with, what's the reason I need two ATI cards rather than one? I'd like to game at 1080P settings btw.
Would a 4870x2 suffice better?
Originally posted by: DoubleHelix747
Absolutely awesome thread! Saved me tons of posting ;-)
For those wanting to (1) keep costs down (2) indulge only in moderate gaming and video editing, and (3) having home theater/HD multimedia focus, could you also please recommend a motherboard with on-board video? Or is this asking too much?
Despite both ATI and NVIDIA being much faster than Intel, the overall gameplay experience delivered by their integrated graphics solutions is still piss poor. Even on older games. Try running Oblivion, a 2.5-year old title, on even AMD's 780G and you'll find that you have to run it at the lowest visual quality settings, at the lowest resolutions (800 x 600, max) to get playable frame rates. At those settings, the game looks absolutely horrible.
Originally posted by: crimson117
Originally posted by: DoubleHelix747
Absolutely awesome thread! Saved me tons of posting ;-)
For those wanting to (1) keep costs down (2) indulge only in moderate gaming and video editing, and (3) having home theater/HD multimedia focus, could you also please recommend a motherboard with on-board video? Or is this asking too much?
By moderate gaming, what do you mean? For casual website games any integrated graphics motherboard will do.
But for anything 3D that you install to your computer, you're really better off just getting a $50 dedicated graphics card. None of the motherboard graphics can hold a candle to even a budget graphics card.
Anand wrote:
Despite both ATI and NVIDIA being much faster than Intel, the overall gameplay experience delivered by their integrated graphics solutions is still piss poor. Even on older games. Try running Oblivion, a 2.5-year old title, on even AMD's 780G and you'll find that you have to run it at the lowest visual quality settings, at the lowest resolutions (800 x 600, max) to get playable frame rates. At those settings, the game looks absolutely horrible.
If you still want integrated motherboard graphics for some reason, the nVidia 9400 intel motherboards or the AMD 790GX with sideport are the best performing for gaming and for HD playback.
Originally posted by: Special K
Any particular recommendations for sound cards?
Originally posted by: Horsepower
Great thread to help my decisions, but, of course it's now January 2009.
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: Special K
Any particular recommendations for sound cards?
Yea onboard
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: Special K
Any particular recommendations for sound cards?
Yea onboard
Really? Are the onboard sound cards as good as the standalone ones nowdays?
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: Special K
Any particular recommendations for sound cards?
Yea onboard
Really? Are the onboard sound cards as good as the standalone ones nowdays?
No but they are still really good. I don't think it's worth spending $80 to pair it up to $100 speakers. Onboard still sounds great. Only reason to buy a soundcard today is if you need those extra connections or if you really do have great quality speakers to notice the difference. This is all assuming you have a fairly recent motherboard.