Avengers: Age of Ultron Trailer

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Agree about BW&Hulk, that was a pretty clear continuation from 1.

This girl in cave I mentioned before was supposed to be part of the Thor pool sequence but was cut. Given the comments that segment haas received, woudlnt be surprised if it gets edited for he disc release.

There was also a Loki scene at some point but that never made the final film.

Don't mind the fake QS getting killed, the Xmen one was so much better so through the magic of film he can still come over.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,483
8,344
126
One other nitpick annoyance...what kind of super spy has a neon blue glowing accent all the way around their outfit. That's like the opposite of spy

Guess she's putting the "Tron" in Ultron.
 

Bubbleawsome

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2013
4,834
1,204
146
For people reading below, this all has spoilers
Agree about BW&Hulk, that was a pretty clear continuation from 1.

This girl in cave I mentioned before was supposed to be part of the Thor pool sequence but was cut. Given the comments that segment haas received, woudlnt be surprised if it gets edited for he disc release.

There was also a Loki scene at some point but that never made the final film.

Don't mind the fake QS getting killed, the Xmen one was so much better so through the magic of film he can still come over.
The cave scene will be intact, at least in the extended edition.
Problem is, Disney can't get the rights to the xmen or mutants. They had to create this "inhuman" category to get around it. There is also a movie called "Inhumans" probably going to come out in something like 2017-18 and they wouldn't want to cross contaminate the universes.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,483
8,344
126
For people reading below, this all has spoilers

The cave scene will be intact, at least in the extended edition.
Problem is, Disney can't get the rights to the xmen or mutants. They had to create this "inhuman" category to get around it. There is also a movie called "Inhumans" probably going to come out in something like 2017-18 and they wouldn't want to cross contaminate the universes.

Inhuman or "Enhanced"? That's how they referenced them in the movie.
 

Bubbleawsome

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2013
4,834
1,204
146
One other nitpick annoyance...what kind of super spy has a neon blue glowing accent all the way around their outfit. That's like the opposite of spy

Guess she's putting the "Tron" in Ultron.

I thought that was electrically charged areas of her suit for tazing the ultrons. Also, even if they were just for looks she was in a combat mode, not stealth mode.
 

Bubbleawsome

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2013
4,834
1,204
146
Inhuman or "Enhanced"? That's how they referenced them in the movie.
I'm not 10% sure, but in the TV show (Agents of shield) there are enhanced people, but there is also a generic "powered people" label, and then they are working on the inhumans storyline.

Either way though, I doubt we will see an xman quicksilver anytime soon, unless fox goes under.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
I know she hated the blue glow cause she had to lug around a battery pack to keep it going.


Remember reading something on the inhuman stuff the other day, from memory they said the for the tv series they did say inhuman during the ads, but in actual show used another term. Article speculated it was one part continued legal nomenclature wrangling around "mutants" and the rest due to future movie.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,161
136
Hated it. B O R I NG. Ten year old stuff. Yawn. Embarrassing the stars/actors/characters couldn't make it solo so this... "turd" was developed.
And the masses fell for it. Again.
I'm clueless.
Felt like I spent two hours staring at some stupid kid playing his PS4.
No, I didn't "have" to see this, but... forced at gunpoint.
I.e. we've seen all the other movies out.
And netflix at home just doesn't cut it on a Saturday night.

Oh well... If it doesn't explode or have boobs bouncing in your face on screen, it doesn't sell.
And thats sad.
And we wonder why people vote the way they do and act the way they do...
Gesh!
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,705
5,458
136
Hated it. B O R I NG. Ten year old stuff. Yawn. Embarrassing the stars/actors/characters couldn't make it solo so this... "turd" was developed.
And the masses fell for it. Again.
I'm clueless.
Felt like I spent two hours staring at some stupid kid playing his PS4.

Uh...it's a superhero movie based on a comic book, what exactly were you expecting? :biggrin:

If you go into it critiquing it as a work of art destined to go into the filmmaking hall of fame, you're going to be disappointed. If you go into it with your twelve-year-old hat on, it's a lot more enjoyable.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,705
5,458
136
Agree about BW&Hulk, that was a pretty clear continuation from 1.

This girl in cave I mentioned before was supposed to be part of the Thor pool sequence but was cut. Given the comments that segment haas received, woudlnt be surprised if it gets edited for he disc release.

There was also a Loki scene at some point but that never made the final film.

Don't mind the fake QS getting killed, the Xmen one was so much better so through the magic of film he can still come over.

Yeah it would have been fun to tilt the hat towards that, like when Thor disappeared at the farm for awhile, just show a little bit of Loki doing some evil plotting back at the home planet.

I agree, I liked the X-Men Quicksilver MUCH more. That one scene when he's running in a circle around the room, stopping bullets, punching guys in slow-motion, etc., was amazing. imo he warrants his own movie, I think it could be really fun!

Still want a Hawkeye movie though
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Yeah it would have been fun to tilt the hat towards that, like when Thor disappeared at the farm for awhile, just show a little bit of Loki doing some evil plotting back at the home planet.

I agree, I liked the X-Men Quicksilver MUCH more. That one scene when he's running in a circle around the room, stopping bullets, punching guys in slow-motion, etc., was amazing. imo he warrants his own movie, I think it could be really fun!

Still want a Hawkeye movie though

I think Marvel was really hamstrung with the twins. Them being gypsies and the children of Magento being removed kind of just turned them into plot devices. It also was lame Scarlet Witch was so gimped. But, being able to alter reality would have made the movie a lot shorter. =)
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,705
5,458
136
I think Marvel was really hamstrung with the twins. Them being gypsies and the children of Magento being removed kind of just turned them into plot devices. It also was lame Scarlet Witch was so gimped. But, being able to alter reality would have made the movie a lot shorter. =)

Yeah because even as-is, she easily seems like the most powerful mutant ever...she can warp your brain, do force-fields, zap you into pieces with red fog, etc.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
I think Marvel was really hamstrung with the twins. Them being gypsies and the children of Magento being removed kind of just turned them into plot devices. It also was lame Scarlet Witch was so gimped. But, being able to alter reality would have made the movie a lot shorter. =)

Well, they gimped them both on purpose and it was also quite literally said directly to the audience when the scientist told Strucker, "They're not ready yet."

I mostly meant the way he held his head and moved. I didn't really notice the mouth moving so much. It was the way the CGI carried itself, which is an odd thing to say.

Ah, yeah... that CGI work was pretty good. It was just that odd mouth movement that looked too much like it was ripped from a PIXAR movie.

In talking with some friends and reading some comments here, I'm in the camp that it would have been better split up into two movies.

Apparently, the director's cut of the movie is actually 3 and a half hours long.

One other nitpick annoyance...what kind of super spy has a neon blue glowing accent all the way around their outfit. That's like the opposite of spy

Guess she's putting the "Tron" in Ultron.

I assumed that those were devices on her suit to amplify her movements. Her batons also had the same markings, which I assumed were probably like tasers or something.
 
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
Ah, yeah... that CGI work was pretty good. It was just that odd mouth movement that looked too much like it was ripped from a PIXAR movie.

Personally I think its just because it was too human like for something that is supposed to be a robot.

Human like movement is fine because we're limited to the mechanical rotation of our joints. But speaking tends to use a lot of flesh manipulation and Ultrons metal mouth simply doesn't seem "realistic" in how it moves while he talks.
 
Last edited:

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Personally I think its just because it was too human like for something that is supposed to be a robot.

Human like movement is fine because we're limited to the rotation of our singular joints. But speaking tends to use a lot of flesh manipulation and ultrons metal mouth simply doesn't seem "realistic" in how it moves while he talks.

Yeah, that bothered me a bit. I loved the sarcasm and otherwise human traits, but his mouth moving like that just wasn't right.
 

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
Personally I think its just because it was too human like for something that is supposed to be a robot.

Human like movement is fine because we're limited to the mechanical rotation of our joints. But speaking tends to use a lot of flesh manipulation and Ultrons metal mouth simply doesn't seem "realistic" in how it moves while he talks.

This is what gets you guys? Not that he's apparently a super-intelligent AI who can't make a decent plan to destroy the world and who can't build his robot army out of anything but tin cans and who can't accurately predict what anyone is going to do at any point in time? You're stuck on the fact that his mouth doesn't move right?
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
452
126
This is what gets you guys? Not that he's apparently a super-intelligent AI who can't make a decent plan to destroy the world and who can't build his robot army out of anything but tin cans and who can't accurately predict what anyone is going to do at any point in time? You're stuck on the fact that his mouth doesn't move right?
Is this why they call you Mr Pedantic?
 

dr150

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2003
6,570
24
81
Hated it. B O R I NG. Ten year old stuff. Yawn. Embarrassing the stars/actors/characters couldn't make it solo so this... "turd" was developed.
And the masses fell for it. Again.
I'm clueless.
Felt like I spent two hours staring at some stupid kid playing his PS4.
No, I didn't "have" to see this, but... forced at gunpoint.
I.e. we've seen all the other movies out.
And netflix at home just doesn't cut it on a Saturday night.

Oh well... If it doesn't explode or have boobs bouncing in your face on screen, it doesn't sell.
And thats sad.
And we wonder why people vote the way they do and act the way they do...
Gesh!

Absolutely correct.

Action scenes were a too-fast blur. You lose context of the scene with that speed.

Character development was cardboard. Couldn't care less when one of the characters died.

My wife also said: "Great effects, but a blur. Can't take away anything noteworthy from those 2 hours. What was the point of that?"

Given time, this movie will be forgotten.

Give the helm to someone other than Whedon for the Thanos movie. This was shyte work. :thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown:
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
This is what gets you guys? Not that he's apparently a super-intelligent AI who can't make a decent plan to destroy the world and who can't build his robot army out of anything but tin cans and who can't accurately predict what anyone is going to do at any point in time? You're stuck on the fact that his mouth doesn't move right?

I thought it stuck out like a sore thumb. Ultron has a pretty nifty robotic look, but his mouth was animated like he was pulled straight from Toy Story. Also, when it comes to Marvel movies, I've gotten really used to dumb villains with dumb plans. Marvel has pretty much convinced me that they are incapable of creating an interesting and convincing villain, and yes, I am including Loki in that.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I thought it stuck out like a sore thumb. Ultron has a pretty nifty robotic look, but his mouth was animated like he was pulled straight from Toy Story. Also, when it comes to Marvel movies, I've gotten really used to dumb villains with dumb plans. Marvel has pretty much convinced me that they are incapable of creating an interesting and convincing villain, and yes, I am including Loki in that.

Because their interesting villains are either not allowed or not fightable by the Avengers anyway. Avengers couldn't take on Dormammu, for example. And Thanos (my favorite) is going to be bitched out and shrunken down to scrub size for the movies. There is no way Marvel follows the comic. Nobody wants to see that, especially with the resolution.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,736
126
Because their interesting villains are either not allowed or not fightable by the Avengers anyway. Avengers couldn't take on Dormammu, for example. And Thanos (my favorite) is going to be bitched out and shrunken down to scrub size for the movies. There is no way Marvel follows the comic. Nobody wants to see that, especially with the resolution.

in the comics, thanos lost while wielding the all mighty infinity gauntlet because he willed it so.

yeah, that wont go over so well in movie format
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
in the comics, thanos lost while wielding the all mighty infinity gauntlet because he willed it so.

yeah, that wont go over so well in movie format

In the Infinity Gauntlet, Thanos killed all of the Avengers using one of the stones. They were cannon fodder in Adam Warlock's plan. He lost the gauntlet because he left it on his actual body when he became Eternity, and Warlock surmised it was because Thanos accepted he wasn't worthy of ultimate power and thus allowed himself to lose it. It had nothing to do with anyone actually being able to stop him. He had ultimate power. This won't go over in a movie, because the public won't want to watch a movie where the stars are killed like the nothing they are on by beings fighting on the cosmic scale. So, they are going to make him a punk ass bitch and ruin it. Thanos didn't need some moron jabroni to get the gems for him. He took them himself from people wielding their power.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |