SsupernovaE
Golden Member
- Dec 12, 2006
- 1,128
- 0
- 76
That was a different gauntlet, apparently. I don't remember if it was right-handed, but if it was then it could've been the second of a pair.
The cave scene will be intact, at least in the extended edition.Agree about BW&Hulk, that was a pretty clear continuation from 1.
This girl in cave I mentioned before was supposed to be part of the Thor pool sequence but was cut. Given the comments that segment haas received, woudlnt be surprised if it gets edited for he disc release.
There was also a Loki scene at some point but that never made the final film.
Don't mind the fake QS getting killed, the Xmen one was so much better so through the magic of film he can still come over.
For people reading below, this all has spoilers
The cave scene will be intact, at least in the extended edition.
Problem is, Disney can't get the rights to the xmen or mutants. They had to create this "inhuman" category to get around it. There is also a movie called "Inhumans" probably going to come out in something like 2017-18 and they wouldn't want to cross contaminate the universes.
One other nitpick annoyance...what kind of super spy has a neon blue glowing accent all the way around their outfit. That's like the opposite of spy
Guess she's putting the "Tron" in Ultron.
I'm not 10% sure, but in the TV show (Agents of shield) there are enhanced people, but there is also a generic "powered people" label, and then they are working on the inhumans storyline.Inhuman or "Enhanced"? That's how they referenced them in the movie.
Hated it. B O R I NG. Ten year old stuff. Yawn. Embarrassing the stars/actors/characters couldn't make it solo so this... "turd" was developed.
And the masses fell for it. Again.
I'm clueless.
Felt like I spent two hours staring at some stupid kid playing his PS4.
Agree about BW&Hulk, that was a pretty clear continuation from 1.
This girl in cave I mentioned before was supposed to be part of the Thor pool sequence but was cut. Given the comments that segment haas received, woudlnt be surprised if it gets edited for he disc release.
There was also a Loki scene at some point but that never made the final film.
Don't mind the fake QS getting killed, the Xmen one was so much better so through the magic of film he can still come over.
Yeah it would have been fun to tilt the hat towards that, like when Thor disappeared at the farm for awhile, just show a little bit of Loki doing some evil plotting back at the home planet.
I agree, I liked the X-Men Quicksilver MUCH more. That one scene when he's running in a circle around the room, stopping bullets, punching guys in slow-motion, etc., was amazing. imo he warrants his own movie, I think it could be really fun!
Still want a Hawkeye movie though
I think Marvel was really hamstrung with the twins. Them being gypsies and the children of Magento being removed kind of just turned them into plot devices. It also was lame Scarlet Witch was so gimped. But, being able to alter reality would have made the movie a lot shorter. =)
I think Marvel was really hamstrung with the twins. Them being gypsies and the children of Magento being removed kind of just turned them into plot devices. It also was lame Scarlet Witch was so gimped. But, being able to alter reality would have made the movie a lot shorter. =)
I mostly meant the way he held his head and moved. I didn't really notice the mouth moving so much. It was the way the CGI carried itself, which is an odd thing to say.
In talking with some friends and reading some comments here, I'm in the camp that it would have been better split up into two movies.
One other nitpick annoyance...what kind of super spy has a neon blue glowing accent all the way around their outfit. That's like the opposite of spy
Guess she's putting the "Tron" in Ultron.
Ah, yeah... that CGI work was pretty good. It was just that odd mouth movement that looked too much like it was ripped from a PIXAR movie.
Personally I think its just because it was too human like for something that is supposed to be a robot.
Human like movement is fine because we're limited to the rotation of our singular joints. But speaking tends to use a lot of flesh manipulation and ultrons metal mouth simply doesn't seem "realistic" in how it moves while he talks.
Personally I think its just because it was too human like for something that is supposed to be a robot.
Human like movement is fine because we're limited to the mechanical rotation of our joints. But speaking tends to use a lot of flesh manipulation and Ultrons metal mouth simply doesn't seem "realistic" in how it moves while he talks.
Is this why they call you Mr Pedantic?This is what gets you guys? Not that he's apparently a super-intelligent AI who can't make a decent plan to destroy the world and who can't build his robot army out of anything but tin cans and who can't accurately predict what anyone is going to do at any point in time? You're stuck on the fact that his mouth doesn't move right?
Hated it. B O R I NG. Ten year old stuff. Yawn. Embarrassing the stars/actors/characters couldn't make it solo so this... "turd" was developed.
And the masses fell for it. Again.
I'm clueless.
Felt like I spent two hours staring at some stupid kid playing his PS4.
No, I didn't "have" to see this, but... forced at gunpoint.
I.e. we've seen all the other movies out.
And netflix at home just doesn't cut it on a Saturday night.
Oh well... If it doesn't explode or have boobs bouncing in your face on screen, it doesn't sell.
And thats sad.
And we wonder why people vote the way they do and act the way they do...
Gesh!
This is what gets you guys? Not that he's apparently a super-intelligent AI who can't make a decent plan to destroy the world and who can't build his robot army out of anything but tin cans and who can't accurately predict what anyone is going to do at any point in time? You're stuck on the fact that his mouth doesn't move right?
I thought it stuck out like a sore thumb. Ultron has a pretty nifty robotic look, but his mouth was animated like he was pulled straight from Toy Story. Also, when it comes to Marvel movies, I've gotten really used to dumb villains with dumb plans. Marvel has pretty much convinced me that they are incapable of creating an interesting and convincing villain, and yes, I am including Loki in that.
Because their interesting villains are either not allowed or not fightable by the Avengers anyway. Avengers couldn't take on Dormammu, for example. And Thanos (my favorite) is going to be bitched out and shrunken down to scrub size for the movies. There is no way Marvel follows the comic. Nobody wants to see that, especially with the resolution.
in the comics, thanos lost while wielding the all mighty infinity gauntlet because he willed it so.
yeah, that wont go over so well in movie format